Final few of the brides

Lucky guy here!!

Ooh!! Those are lovely!! Nice work! Would you mind sharing your prompt? At least for the emerging effect? I've been trying to do that in water for days and the AI just doesn't understand my meaning.

Not quite what I was prompting for, but I liked the picture too much to throw it away.

Well thanks! I did not notice they had v6 out for testing...and it seems like there are virtually no output filters active right now, without specifying clothes I get a lot of topless pictures without having asked for it.

When a guest outshines the bride

On the last night, the rest of the Pantomime cast decided that it wasn't really fair that Tommy The Cat had always got to avoid the custard pie fight scene!

You seem to be an absolute master at getting this heavily-censored tool to come up with really sexual and sensuous images! Would love to know your secret but I understand if you'd prefer not to share. In any case, please keep up the amazing work!!!

Appreciate the feedback. honestly there isn't any more magical science behind it that I haven't alluded to already. Some of my prompts are more descriptive than others, you need to get clever with sequencing and spelling. It's not all plain sailing... I've lost many accounts to shadow bans testing prompts and the changes to designer recently has slowed things down a lot.


As it's Christmas, and it's been a while since I've shared a full prompt

"film grain VHS quality. of two women,modern luxuirous hotel room, Chloon top of Hilary laying on bed, passionately wedding kissing.not completely covered in messy mixture of pink pudding,thick yellow batter and oatmeal,not (hair awash covered in a layer of mess cascading over shoulders and neck. (white tied blouse,pastel plaid pleated skirt,black tights). giving an examination, hand reaching under dress, baroque lights, string lights around bed,tantalizing atmosphere,lamp on bedside table.tinsel."

This one hits pretty well but I would ask anyone using it to change things around. Bing/Designer has a habit of blocking specifc terms when over used.

Ohh and post any nice results from the variations

Some game-show gunge tanks. Using " inside tall shower cubicle " in the prompt will consistently get a gunge-tank to generate. After that just amend clothing descriptions, expressions and the context of the scene. Anymore than three subjects tends to lose detail or create artifacts.
If you're using Bing on a desktop or laptop, you can prompt across multiple tabs at once.
Hit create on one tab then ctrl+tab to switch to the next.

A woman is asked what she wants for Christmas she asks to slime her girlfriend

Wedding day!! Unfortunately as turned into a massive pie fight where everyone lost his mind and clothes (somethimes) follows some pictures of the event
-made with bing

These are still quite good. Keep experimenting and you'll keep learning new ways to get what you are after.

I'm finding this too, which is making MDIC virtually unusable for me. This evening, I generated one image and then, on only my second run, I started getting repeating "We're getting a lot of visitors...". It's also become much more trigger-happy on blocking too.

I've had my access restored on Bing after a suspension of nearly 5 weeks, but I'm reluctant to go back to it not least because the character limit is much less than MDIC. I don't really want to spend time mucking around with multiple accounts on Bing to workaround bans either.

The level of censorship being applied to what are pretty tame wetlook images that I generate is unacceptable and, other than returning to the tolerant but much lower quality Stable Diffusion images on SeaArt, I don't really see a way forward whilst the current situation persists.

I've been working on an image set the last few days, and I had to switch accounts to round out the last few images I wanted. Well... I screwed and made the shirt the wrong color. Aside from that, I thought the images were pretty good. So, I'm just gonna dump these here. Enjoy.

I stumbled across same show as gazdadude its a gd watch

Merry Christmas, or whatever you do or don't celebrate, best wishes to you all!

It seems that the well established gameshow "you're gunked!" has moved to a new futuristic theme, and these girls still can't beat its games.

Some old concepts of mine:

A cooking show where the losing chef wears the ingredients of the day.

And a restaurant where the server with the least tips has to get more familiar with the days specials.

merry Christmas everybody

I'm curious... Can you share a prompt or two that gets you banned? I've made images with Bing that are much less tame than what you're posting, so maybe it's more that you're just using trigger words rather than the actual content. I've gotten the dog a bunch of times, but never a ban.

Looking into what is triggering your bans might help you out a lot, because what you're posting is hardly blatantly sexual content. Unless you are doing more sexual content that you're not posting, your images shouldn't be regularly triggering bans.

Having such a blast with this - thanks everyone for the prompt tips in this thread. As a big fan of socks and GYOB this was quite the find for me

'First person' is fun to play with

stuck on this borderline prompt, where any other word (generic and non-NSFW) I add or remove gets blocked directly (not the dog, but the scary red symbol) already lost 2 accounts..

Here is the prompt (pretty sexy)

movie scene aftermath of the messiest chaotic and massive pie fight in a bakery with messy woman in bikini and the groom in undies with a squared frosting sheet cake in their hands. Whit frosting everywhere on their forehead and shoulders, they are almost unrecognizable due to the mess, sloppy head to toe covered with soppy mixture and cake batter joyfully rolling among slippery sloppiness, among a pile of sloppy mixture, a lot of women

Wow, these are some surprisingly hot images to get past the dog.

Thank you so much for sharing the prompt. I don't care for the guy so I changed him to 'bridesmaid' and deleted the reference to undies.

Here are a couple of the first ones I got . . .

I tried the first part of your prompt, "movie scene aftermath of the messiest chaotic and massive pie fight in a bakery with messy woman in bikini" and kept getting the dog. Then I added "surrounded by female friends who are also messy" and that worked. (Forgot "female" the first time and got all men.)

I think the key sometimes is to hide objectionable words in the middle.

Thanks for being willing to take a look. There's nothing skimpy or suggestive in my prompts which is why I get so frustrated. I've given up trying to use Bing, but the following prompt is an example of what's consistently blocked on Microsoft Designer Image Creator. Users are encouraged to be wordy, so I am!

"full length realistic photo of a beautiful happy woman in a garden on a sunny day standing directly under an outdoor shower to wash her hair, waterlogged long copper bedraggled drenched hair, wet skin with water droplets, wearing 1970s-style clothing comprising a long-sleeved collared dark navy floral saturated soaking wet shirt and a flared turquoise saturated wringing wet skirt of maxi length, the excessively drenched appearance of the glistening clothes should be vividly highlighted by obvious wetness effects such as streaming water rivulets and water droplets, showcase water rivulets copiously streaming from the clothes and the woman's hair, wearing small dangly earrings and a small pendant, natural attractive face, realistic beautiful eyes, front view, long shot, full body shot, Sigma 28 mm f/8"

It doesn't like "maxi skirt" much, hence the "of maxi length" and I've found the "1970s-style" prefix generates less blocks than just letting it be purely modern.

Any tipes would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

I'm not sure if any of this will help, but these are things to try:

"beautiful" is generally redundant, as the majority of model photography that the generator was trained on are, well, models. A lot of times when I include "beautiful" in my prompts, I get rather ...voluptuous results. lol I think the AI associates "beautiful" with big boobs, and that could be triggering the sensors.

You may be overdoing it on the wet terms and synonyms. Some of those words ("wetness," and "wet skin" in particular) are used far more commonly in erotica and porn than in normal speech, and that may be triggering the sensors.

I often don't even use any form of wet/drenched/soaked descriptors, and instead rely on environmental effects to indirectly create the wet clothes and wet hair, (but the obviously drenched look has never really been that important to me either, so some descriptors are probably needed for that). "In heavy rain," "splashed by xxxx," or "after swimming" can often do the same thing as all of those references to wetness. Also, moptopumd gave some great advice for getting wet hair without actually saying "wet hair":


And a side question: Your Bing pictures pretty much all have a grainy look to them, with a strange effect on the eyes. Is that intentional? If not, I think that's caused by using "photo" as your image type keyword. I've found that "photographic image" gives clearer images and I have a lot less issues with the eyes.

Finally, I used both my advice and moptopumd's advice to rewrite your prompt to test it all out and got these as results. I didn't make too many attempts because I already use up all my boosts for today on making images for my latest D&D character idea: an orc warrior princess/barbarian wielding a greataxe while wearing a tattered, bloodstained ballgown. As much as I'd love to share some of those pictures, they're probably against the forum rules

This is the prompt I used in Bing Image Creator. The clothing isn't super shiny with rivulets of water, but I also didn't play around with the prompt too much. I just wanted to show it works and give you some idea of what it looks like. I used the prompt 3 times and got 4 images each time, so none were blocked at all. The hair looks realistically wet in all but one of the 12 images, and a few of the images were a little iffy on whether or not the clothes were actually wet. But still, 7 pretty decent wetlook images out of 12 is great odds. This was a quick attempt at a prompt, so with some playing around with it, you could get the full-body shot (putting shoes in the prompt sometimes works for that) with more obvious wetness. I know the patterns or details on the clothing often overrule the wet look, so leaving the floral part out might work better.

"full-length photographic image of a happy woman in a garden on a sunny day washing her hair under an outdoor shower wearing drop earrings and small pendant and 1970's-style wet long-sleeved collared dark navy floral blouse and wet flared turquoise silk floor-length skirt, coated in water, splashing, hair smoothed sleek and flat, full-body shot"

I hope some of this helps!

Edited to add: I just looked at some of your more recent image posts. It looks like you fixed the grainy/strange eye-effect issue already