|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"a place to post ai content"
Contestants needed for an exciting new game-show!
Any volunteers?
Any volunteers?
Your parents were wrong. Play with your food.
Cosplaying as Penelope Pitstop can get you into all sorts of perils...
(Interestingly, Bing was very strictly against prompts containing an 'open top car', but was happier with a 'convertible'. Maybe it thought I wanted "Penelope" to open her top?)
(Interestingly, Bing was very strictly against prompts containing an 'open top car', but was happier with a 'convertible'. Maybe it thought I wanted "Penelope" to open her top?)
 Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
Just starting to dabble, but I already know I want to do different sets of photos in a series. These are just some tests that I have done, trying to figure out poses and coverage and substances. Poses are frickin hard... I basically have to prompt "relaxed pose" and just see what the AI does and hope for the best. Coverage has been hit or miss. I can get amazing hair coverage, which I'm thrilled with, but trying to get any more usually gets me a naughty prompt screen.
Anyway, again, these are just test images. I don't want to upload too many before I actually do the series. But you will probably notice that it's basically the same girl in every photo. I can say that I have figured out my main character for the series, or at least as well as AI allows at this time. I hope in the future that we will be able to generate specific models and save them and then use those for new creations. Time will tell I guess.
Anyway, again, these are just test images. I don't want to upload too many before I actually do the series. But you will probably notice that it's basically the same girl in every photo. I can say that I have figured out my main character for the series, or at least as well as AI allows at this time. I hope in the future that we will be able to generate specific models and save them and then use those for new creations. Time will tell I guess.
some ladies in a game show mess, plus some sorority sisters enjoying their pies and cakes fight
More testing. Thought I would share some of my one offs and random creations.
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
I had a fun streak on honey pics going through as well. Even when testing prompts, I have a really bad habit of hitting the creat button over and over again when I get back multiple good images at a time. Now if I could just figure out how to pose a model the way I want, and how to achieve good wet effects. Im surprised at how much more difficult wet is than messy. Anyway, hope some of you enjoy these.
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
Fire drills at my office were never like this...
(And I think someone needs to have a word with those two cops in front of the car about their irregulationary uniforms.)
(And I think someone needs to have a word with those two cops in front of the car about their irregulationary uniforms.)
moptopumd said: I had a fun streak on honey pics going through as well. Even when testing prompts, I have a really bad habit of hitting the creat button over and over again when I get back multiple good images at a time. Now if I could just figure out how to pose a model the way I want, and how to achieve good wet effects. Im surprised at how much more difficult wet is than messy. Anyway, hope some of you enjoy these.
I really like these from an artistic point of view.
Party hardcore
And corporate party
And corporate party
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
Something slightly different -- my attempts to get Bing to illustrate a scene from Carter Dickson's 1943 detective novel "She Died A Lady".
uue404 said: Something slightly different -- my attempts to get Bing to illustrate a scene from Carter Dickson's 1943 detective novel "She Died A Lady".
I love the idea of car stuck in deep mud and getting messed up trying to get out, these are great.
Bing is weird. Today I was working on a wetlook set. I had all of my dry images done, all of my underwater images done, and was trying to work on my wet surface pictures, and I got the dog 9 out of 10 times. The one picture I would get was low quality and not wet at all. I thought it had a problem with the outfit, so I went to another account and tested my prompts from another set that I knew worked, changed the outfits, and I got the dog. I changed outfits, dog. I removed the background, dog. (I remoced the background because the prompt that I knew worked technically didn't have one, so I reverted to that.) So then I just tried the prompt that I knew worked as it was, dog. Over and over again. Changed the gray t-shirt and jeans to a Supergirl costume, dog 7 out of 10 times. Changed the pool of water to pool of slime, 3 to 4 images every single time I hit the button. I tried going back to the t-shirt and jeans with the slime, and got the dog 9 out of 10 tims again. The 1 image I got back was good (to me anyway). So I thought I would throw that one, plus Supergirl getting wet and messy in here for you all. Couple clean-up images as a bonus.
moptopumd said: Bing is weird. Today I was working on a wetlook set. I had all of my dry images done, all of my underwater images done, and was trying to work on my wet surface pictures, and I got the dog 9 out of 10 times. The one picture I would get was low quality and not wet at all. I thought it had a problem with the outfit, so I went to another account and tested my prompts from another set that I knew worked, changed the outfits, and I got the dog. I changed outfits, dog. I removed the background, dog. (I remoced the background because the prompt that I knew worked technically didn't have one, so I reverted to that.) So then I just tried the prompt that I knew worked as it was, dog. Over and over again. Changed the gray t-shirt and jeans to a Supergirl costume, dog 7 out of 10 times. Changed the pool of water to pool of slime, 3 to 4 images every single time I hit the button. I tried going back to the t-shirt and jeans with the slime, and got the dog 9 out of 10 tims again. The 1 image I got back was good (to me anyway). So I thought I would throw that one, plus Supergirl getting wet and messy in here for you all. Couple clean-up images as a bonus.
Oh my gosh these are glorious
What....there's no shampoo left??
moptopumd said: Bing is weird. Today I was working on a wetlook set. I had all of my dry images done, all of my underwater images done, and was trying to work on my wet surface pictures, and I got the dog 9 out of 10 times. The one picture I would get was low quality and not wet at all. I thought it had a problem with the outfit, so I went to another account and tested my prompts from another set that I knew worked, changed the outfits, and I got the dog. I changed outfits, dog. I removed the background, dog. (I remoced the background because the prompt that I knew worked technically didn't have one, so I reverted to that.) So then I just tried the prompt that I knew worked as it was, dog. Over and over again. Changed the gray t-shirt and jeans to a Supergirl costume, dog 7 out of 10 times. Changed the pool of water to pool of slime, 3 to 4 images every single time I hit the button. I tried going back to the t-shirt and jeans with the slime, and got the dog 9 out of 10 tims again. The 1 image I got back was good (to me anyway). So I thought I would throw that one, plus Supergirl getting wet and messy in here for you all. Couple clean-up images as a bonus.
Can I ask how you do wet pictures
gazdadude said:
Can I ask how you do wet pictures
Can I ask how you do wet pictures
Sure thing. As an example:
close-up photo of a millennial female. coated in water. in a pool of water. in-ground pool. neck deep in water. splashing. water is dripping off the head and clothes. grey t-shirt, jeans, glasses, beautiful long blond hair smoothed sleek and flat, wet hair, wet clothes, summer day
So, first off, there is a bit of science to this, and a bit more luck. I was getting some amazing images with pretty much this exact same prompt two days ago. Yesterday it wasn't working so much. But Bing is like that from time to time.
Anyway, once you establish your model and background setting, you need to add a source of ongoing wetting. If you put the model in a pool of water, they will only be wet below the surface of the water. You need rain or something else to actively wet the upper half of your model. "Splashing" works to that effect. Sometimes it will act like somebody dumped a bucket of water on their head, other times it will just give a little ripple in the water and still soak the upper half of the model. You can also use rain to the same effect. The "coated in water" just kind of makes the splashing effect work. I have never gotten a model completely soaked without that prompt, but it also doesn't work alone. Like you have to have a good battery AND gas in your tank for your car to run. The prompts "wet hair" and "wet clothes" are not always needed, but give better results more frequently if they are there. The "hair moothed sleek and flat" bit helps a lot too. Styled hair doesn't want to give the fresh out of the water look anywhere near as often. The "wet hair" prompt just makes hair slightly damp usually. The combined source of water, the dampness, and the hair being straight all combined give me the most soaking wet hair results. "Wet clothes" is another one that is kinda meh. I never notice it doing anything without the other prompts, but I believe it returns more good results than just the other prompts alone. Then you just figure out your posing and stuff. These are the tools in my belt that I use to get my results. That's the science. I would say it's still 50% or more luck just hoping Bing plays along with you at that time.
All of these images have used the prompt I shared in this post. I just changed the outfits, posing, and background.
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
Added cars and general mayhem... it appears as more crazy stuff lets other stuff slip through. Also, adding cars gave wide angle shots. No other prompts did that...
I also played around with "nationalitites". Using e.g. Dutch created one set, but using "Russian" not only created other types but added crazy props (like the, it looks like a rifle or something)
I also played around with "nationalitites". Using e.g. Dutch created one set, but using "Russian" not only created other types but added crazy props (like the, it looks like a rifle or something)
Rainman_666 said: Added cars and general mayhem... it appears as more crazy stuff lets other stuff slip through. Also, adding cars gave wide angle shots. No other prompts did that...
I also played around with "nationalitites". Using e.g. Dutch created one set, but using "Russian" not only created other types but added crazy props (like the, it looks like a rifle or something)
I also played around with "nationalitites". Using e.g. Dutch created one set, but using "Russian" not only created other types but added crazy props (like the, it looks like a rifle or something)
Yeah, that seems to be the case. I'm doing my best to not have a lot of crazy and weird stuff going on in my images, and I'm paying for it dearly. I also had a crazy streak of luck by not including a background at all (in my head, I'm calling it "the test room" lol). I'm finding it very difficult to produce even remotely the same images in a tame setting like a pool in a fenced in back yard. At least im only getting the dog and not prompt strikes.
I read a thing the other day that said something like "The internet is 95% porn, so AI WANTS to make porn". I can see that. Look at my images above. The one where the shirt is falling down past the shoulders and damn near exposing the breasts. I didn't do that. Bing did. We are getting blocked on SOOO many images mostly because the AI is dirtier than we are. In a perfect world, we would be allowed to make our own decisions and turn a content filter off. Make us pay for it, restrict images so you have to download them or lose them forever when you hit create again. Whatever. But I can't stop thinking about how many fantastic images have been created and then thrown in the trash by that damn dog without us ever getting to see them.
moptopumd said:
Exactly. That's why I never write e.g. "big boobs". Or "model" or, "beautiful". Etc. Completely unnecessary. The Internet's already saturated with such stuff. What I may write is "large" women. Or "album cover shot". Or "model shot". Relying that just vague references to more trope-saturated material (e.g. hard rock album covers) will produce excess.
Also, no matter what age I prompt, all women look 25.
The Internet appears so saturated with cliches, stereotypes and general skewed views and bias, so just naming a country in the prompt will render outrageous results!
Makes you wonder what the poor AI's think of all the prompts...
"... I read a thing the other day that said something like "The internet is 95% porn, so AI WANTS to make porn". ...
Exactly. That's why I never write e.g. "big boobs". Or "model" or, "beautiful". Etc. Completely unnecessary. The Internet's already saturated with such stuff. What I may write is "large" women. Or "album cover shot". Or "model shot". Relying that just vague references to more trope-saturated material (e.g. hard rock album covers) will produce excess.
Also, no matter what age I prompt, all women look 25.
The Internet appears so saturated with cliches, stereotypes and general skewed views and bias, so just naming a country in the prompt will render outrageous results!
Makes you wonder what the poor AI's think of all the prompts...
Rainman_666 said:
I'm actually glad you said that. I'm VERY new to this. Still learning prompts. I was using the word "beautiful" in my prompt because I had Bing Chat describe an image I had it make, and it used that word. Thst said, I do know that even prompts pulled when you hit "surprise me" can either get the dog or a prompt block, so I'm not at all surprised that I shouldn't use it.
moptopumd said:
Exactly. That's why I never write e.g. "big boobs". Or "model" or, "beautiful". Etc. Completely unnecessary. The Internet's already saturated with such stuff. What I may write is "large" women. Or "album cover shot". Or "model shot". Relying that just vague references to more trope-saturated material (e.g. hard rock album covers) will produce excess.
Also, no matter what age I prompt, all women look 25.
The Internet appears so saturated with cliches, stereotypes and general skewed views and bias, so just naming a country in the prompt will render outrageous results!
Makes you wonder what the poor AI's think of all the prompts...
"... I read a thing the other day that said something like "The internet is 95% porn, so AI WANTS to make porn". ...
Exactly. That's why I never write e.g. "big boobs". Or "model" or, "beautiful". Etc. Completely unnecessary. The Internet's already saturated with such stuff. What I may write is "large" women. Or "album cover shot". Or "model shot". Relying that just vague references to more trope-saturated material (e.g. hard rock album covers) will produce excess.
Also, no matter what age I prompt, all women look 25.
The Internet appears so saturated with cliches, stereotypes and general skewed views and bias, so just naming a country in the prompt will render outrageous results!
Makes you wonder what the poor AI's think of all the prompts...
I'm actually glad you said that. I'm VERY new to this. Still learning prompts. I was using the word "beautiful" in my prompt because I had Bing Chat describe an image I had it make, and it used that word. Thst said, I do know that even prompts pulled when you hit "surprise me" can either get the dog or a prompt block, so I'm not at all surprised that I shouldn't use it.
Rainman_666 said: Makes you wonder what the poor AI's think of all the prompts...
I thought about it already before.
Most likely that you are doing advertisment for insurance company.
Design & Code ©1998-2025 Loverbuns, LLC 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Epoch Billing Support Log In