I done a few mud ai pics. But wanted to see if I could tweak and include rain. My first result were an either or, bit finally I have managed to create some.
I carry on tweaking. May even look are running through Krea, as I seen dome good result from that (on here)
I've been doing some more experiments with first person perspective. I've managed to get dishing out mess kind of okay, but I've not cracked "I'm about to have mess poured on me" yet.
This was a two step process WetGownsLover. In Bing image creator I just prompted for American secretaries wearing button down shirts and business skirts. It almost inherently makes their shirts white and usually blurs out any 'pertinent information' around the boob area. To make sure that you can see their legs you specify "wearing high heels". To make sure they are properly wet you have to include a lot of 'water-related' clues like swimming pool, heavy rain, etc.
The second step is to use the Krea.AI image enhancer tool. The faces Bing creates are always sort of generic almost cartoon-ish. Krea makes them more lifelike. Also prompting Krea to show their breasts/ nipples through transparent clothing does not set off any alarms since Krea has no problem making fully nude female figures.
I have made some really hot pictures using Krea. Unfortunately to post anything sexual to UMD I would have to go through their verification process which really doesn't make any sense if I'm just doing this as a hobby.
Perhaps I should open a UMD store then that would allow me to post the really good stuff.
You really should open that store. I'd love to see some results that weren't censored. With the video generators getting more powerful you could turn this into a nice side hustle as time goes by. I guess what I'm saying is "Take my money!"
the real GoOfBaLL said: ...Also prompting Krea to show their breasts/ nipples through transparent clothing does not set off any alarms since Krea has no problem making fully nude female figures.
How do you do that? I've tried on Krea without success.
gotcha13 said: I generated some playful egg fight pics that did not quite fit "Playful Pie Fights" thread, so I am posting them here.
Messy hair and some additional mess are included.
The background looks like it's from Friends or similar era sitcom. Was that intended?
Fully intended. I have many (at least hundreds) of pics with a sitcom theme. I tried generic "female characters from sitcoms" but that did not work as well as specific sitcoms and I am careful to say "characters from" that sitcom rather than "actresses from" the sitcom, and I do not specify actress names.
I have included a few sitcom themed pics here that I generated on March 3, 2024
I also post several Baking Show Contest pie fights on the "Playful Pie Fights" thread.
Uh... weird. Bing just spit out two images at a different aspect ratio. The thumbnails also have a little "widescreen" looking icon on them. I was going to screenshot it, but Bing wont let me.
Edited to add a 3rd image I just got back. It also has the widescreen logo on the thumbnail.
Been playing around with bing, very fun. Does anyone else have issues with "surprise" getting the dog? I assume its too similar to that other kind of expression, and gets swatted
I've got some results with surprised expression, however it was more significant than I intended, so I used 'slight surprise' more often since. The power of the expression has varied though.
Johndoe906 said: Been playing around with bing, very fun. Does anyone else have issues with "surprise" getting the dog? I assume its too similar to that other kind of expression, and gets swatted
It won't be the word surprise on its own. It could be that the resulting image looks too orgasmic, or it could be something else about it.
Try a combination of words and experiment to get what you want. Startled, disbelief, bemused, maybe curious, maybe shocked, aghast, maybe outraged, agog, discombobulated... you get the idea.