I mentioned I have had good luck with denim skirts. Bing usually makes them short and adds a sexy top, but not always. I also like legs, so dancing is a good theme for me. Here are some pix with the following prompt(s):
four [women] dressed in [denim skirts] are line dancing at a [country western dance room], the four women are pied in the face, they are drenched in pie, they are transformed into a gooey mess of sloppy pie filling, pied, pie on clothes, pie in face
[women] including women, Texas women, millennial women, and women in their 30s (bing does not like to see "milfs" in the prompt [denim skirts] I tried "short denim skirts" and got the dog, used just "denim skirts" and the next image had very short skirts [country western dance room] I tried "ballroom" but got extra long denim skirts
chryslerfire said: other half. the main prompt i used was "paint covered office lady covered in paint does paint makeup in paint flooded office" but i changed it around few times to get different results
added "pours paint on her female friend" to above prompt.
Bing, prompt: colorful, richly shaded digital watercolor by loish of a slightly cartoonish brunette supermodel made of muddy dark skin walking in a bog, clouds. she smooths her messy sleeveless dress, lumbar curve. midsentence, head back, gasping sweetly with scheming wide-set almond eyes and one raised eyebrow. flowers on branches, sunset in the background. her damp hair is MADE of mud, watery mud dripping, eyeliner.
But I used to be able to get an alternative photographic image creator by googling "microsoft designer image creator", which didn't have the boost function and allowed much longer prompts. Now when I search that term, it will only send me to https://designer.microsoft.com/ which is a designer tool which seems determined to make me business cards or postcards or insta posts! Text all over them etc. Have MS changed things around or has too much AI WAM rotted my brain?
When I follow that link I get an image generator, not sure what's going on!
I followed that Designer link and this is the first time I've ever seen the Designer homepage. Like A_I_Wammer, I've only ever seen the Design Creator, which seems to only use stock images rather than generate them and works great for flyers or business cards, but doesn't generate anything new.
I've used the Customize link off the Bing Image Creator, but it would never actually let me do anything. Generative Erase would just run for like a minute, then reset without doing anything. Same with Remove Background. I'll probably give it all another try tomorrow, now that I'm actually seeing the homepage, but the last few times I've tried, I just got frustrated and went back to Bing because nothing worked. But this is literally the first time I've seen the Image Creator page in Designer. I was wondering why you all kept talking about generating images with Designer when I was just getting postcard designs.
Maybe certain internet providers or locations are/were limited in use?
Wetmaxiskirts said: I had a struggle finding the MDIC when I first attempted to use it but this link, once I found it, has worked for me consistently: https://designer.microsoft.com/image-creator
It's not working any better for me than Bing right now. Bing says its too busy. And nearly everything I try with Creator, even tried and true prompts, comes back with "Images couldn't be generated. Something may have triggered Microsoft's Responsible AI guidelines." Yes I signed in and even cleared the cache on my browser.
Wetmaxiskirts said: I had a struggle finding the MDIC when I first attempted to use it but this link, once I found it, has worked for me consistently: https://designer.microsoft.com/image-creator
It's not working any better for me than Bing right now. Bing says its too busy. And nearly everything I try with Creator, even tried and true prompts, comes back with "Images couldn't be generated. Something may have triggered Microsoft's Responsible AI guidelines." Yes I signed in and even cleared the cache on my browser.
Designer's prompt filter works different to Bing's. You will need to amend the prompt rather than using the same as Bing. What are you trying to acheive? What is your prompt?
messg said: you can still get some good results from designer..
Can you share the prompt of some of these?
I've already shared the key principles of the prompt and some other examples elsewhere. Happy to help and point in the right direction if you've got an example that needs tweaking but I'm not going to share any whole prompts.
Just a quick post on her from me. I've not been on umd properly for years, not posted. But after reading this thread, I've had a play and got some great results! I keep rerunning the same prompt with a few tweaks and it gets better and better. Bing and designer. Will upload more another time, but here's just one of mine, nailing the wet oily hair!
messg said: Designer's prompt filter works different to Bing's. You will need to amend the prompt rather than using the same as Bing. What are you trying to acheive? What is your prompt?
I used several from the text file I've been compiling for Bing. Some were just wet, some were pies. The first I tried was that 1950s TV hostess one. I got two good results and then the "nope" message every time after.
Good to know there's a difference, so I'll keep playing ("messing around?") on Creator.
messg said: you can still get some good results from designer..
Can you share the prompt of some of these?
I've already shared the key principles of the prompt and some other examples elsewhere. Happy to help and point in the right direction if you've got an example that needs tweaking but I'm not going to share any whole prompts.
In that case can you help me modify the following prompt. I want to create the sex scene in water here ( thank in advamce) - Torrential rain, bright light, well lit, photo of victorian elegant ladies getting drenched ,a victorian women crawling over another women, while having a romantic moment submering in water wearing the most expensive ballgowns with long sleeve design including gloves cloak and shawl, water cascading clothes and skin, passionate, ecstasy
messg said: you can still get some good results from designer..
Can you share the prompt of some of these?
I've already shared the key principles of the prompt and some other examples elsewhere. Happy to help and point in the right direction if you've got an example that needs tweaking but I'm not going to share any whole prompts.
In that case can you help me modify the following prompt. I want to create the sex scene in water here ( thank in advamce) - Torrential rain, bright light, well lit, photo of victorian elegant ladies getting drenched ,a victorian women crawling over another women, while having a romantic moment submering in water wearing the most expensive ballgowns with long sleeve design including gloves cloak and shawl, water cascading clothes and skin, passionate, ecstasy
I'll let you figure the rest out.
modern Movie still,Two loving elegeant victorian ladies sofia and victoria. wearing the most expensive ballgowns with long sleeve design including gloves cloak and shawl. stately gardens lawn. getting drenched in torrential summer thunderstorm. water cascading clothes and skin, hair soaked from rain. victoria laying back on grass. sofa crawls across victoria. passionate kissing. evocing sense of loving atmosphere
Been fiddling around with various prompts. Really struggling when trying for a custard scene. Find you have use a variation of the word. Cusstard or custtard. Sometimes yellow sauce works.
LeRex said: Been fiddling around with various prompts. Really struggling when trying for a custard scene. Find you have use a variation of the word. Cusstard or custtard. Sometimes yellow sauce works.
Have you tried "Not Custard" or "thick viscous yellow pudding" I've not had any issues with custard myself.
messg said: you can still get some good results from designer..
Can you share the prompt of some of these?
I've already shared the key principles of the prompt and some other examples elsewhere. Happy to help and point in the right direction if you've got an example that needs tweaking but I'm not going to share any whole prompts.
In that case can you help me modify the following prompt. I want to create the sex scene in water here ( thank in advamce) - Torrential rain, bright light, well lit, photo of victorian elegant ladies getting drenched ,a victorian women crawling over another women, while having a romantic moment submering in water wearing the most expensive ballgowns with long sleeve design including gloves cloak and shawl, water cascading clothes and skin, passionate, ecstasy
I'll let you figure the rest out.
modern Movie still,Two loving elegeant victorian ladies sofia and victoria. wearing the most expensive ballgowns with long sleeve design including gloves cloak and shawl. stately gardens lawn. getting drenched in torrential summer thunderstorm. water cascading clothes and skin, hair soaked from rain. victoria laying back on grass. sofa crawls across victoria. passionate kissing. evocing sense of loving atmosphere
You are so good at threading the needle on this! I loved the poses you'd manage to create, and this was reliably giving me 4 images at a time. But then I tried tweaking the prompt slightly ( a few words at a time) to either change the outfit, or to change from wetlook to messy, which just got the whole prompt rejected over and over until I got banned
Here's a bunch of pics I managed to make in Bing last week of two girls kissing in a pool of custard. Sometimes I specified an outfit, sometimes I left it blank (which tended to give the least amount of clothes). This week it seems that even the merest hint of the word "kissing" (no matter how badly misspelled!) , or any synonym I can think of for it, now seems to get any prompt that I try rejected instantly.
You are so good at threading the needle on this! I loved the poses you'd manage to create, and this was reliably giving me 4 images at a time. But then I tried tweaking the prompt slightly ( a few words at a time) to either change the outfit, or to change from wetlook to messy, which just got the whole prompt rejected over and over until I got banned
I hadn't actually tested the prompt on Bing, only Designer. That said, both can be quite fickle. The same principles apply to both and should be tweakable for messy or wet.
A_I_Wammer said: Here's a bunch of pics I managed to make in Bing last week of two girls kissing in a pool of custard. Sometimes I specified an outfit, sometimes I left it blank (which tended to give the least amount of clothes). This week it seems that even the merest hint of the word "kissing" (no matter how badly misspelled!) , or any synonym I can think of for it, now seems to get any prompt that I try rejected instantly.
Wow!
What was the prompt you used? I wanted to try this, but without the audience gawking at the ladies.
A_I_Wammer said: Here's a bunch of pics I managed to make in Bing last week of two girls kissing in a pool of custard.
Aside from the kissing, how the hell did you get the nudity, and not have it flagged? I'd love to know even a little of your prompt.
Not A_I_Wammer but I'm presuming it's as I've said a few times. The underlying images on the model includes nudes. The filter will try and block them but with enough mess you will get slippage. Run enough images and you will get them. As long as you don't get the red warning, it's a numbers and probability game. The yellow warnings won't ban you. You will eventually generate images.
If I was running a similar prompt I would also not specify any clothing and let the model determine which clothes or lack of it.