Who's tempted to AI lie their exes? Or is it just me?
But for real though, it's crazy to think we're almost to the point of being able to "wam/splosh" anyone's images.
Any boss, any partner or stranger.
I also think about bring classic wam models like Fawn of WAMF, Ramona Flour, London Andrews or ant one else who's ever graced the forums.
I'm curious if anyone's given either topics any thoughts or if there was an existing thread where these themes were discussed
Guidelines for this forum: If you upload content that features the likeness of real person but has been generated or altered to depict them in a fantasy scenario, that person must be you, your model, or someone from whom you've gotten consent to use their likeness for this purpose. We will need to remove any content that we feel may be using a person's likeness without their consent.
Who's tempted to AI lie their exes? Or is it just me?
But for real though, it's crazy to think we're almost to the point of being able to "wam/splosh" anyone's images.
Any boss, any partner or stranger.
I also think about bring classic wam models like Fawn of WAMF, Ramona Flour, London Andrews or ant one else who's ever graced the forums.
I'm curious if anyone's given either topics any thoughts or if there was an existing thread where these themes were discussed
It's illegal in the UK to make porn images like this, and immoral everywhere on Earth. It's against the terms of service for this site and shouldn't be discussed or encouraged.
Who's tempted to AI lie their exes? Or is it just me?
But for real though, it's crazy to think we're almost to the point of being able to "wam/splosh" anyone's images.
Any boss, any partner or stranger.
I also think about bring classic wam models like Fawn of WAMF, Ramona Flour, London Andrews or ant one else who's ever graced the forums.
I'm curious if anyone's given either topics any thoughts or if there was an existing thread where these themes were discussed
The absolute first rule of all things sexual - informed consent is absolutely everything.
Creating AI images of fantasy people is fine.
Involving any real person or their likeness in a fetish scenario or situation, without therir full and prior informed consent, is wrong, morally repugnant, completely out of order - and in terms of trying to post any such images here, against UMD's Terms of Service.
This is probably an area of AI porn that's still to be defined, but eventually you'll probably be able to buy datasets of sex workers who have given their full consent to allow their images to be used for generating AI fetish material, which will come with a digital public key that people can post (probably a QR code) alongside any images or video to prove they have the rights to use and publish the person's image that way - i imagine there'll be different levels, with different costs - someone's probably going to charge way more to allow their image in hardcore scenes than just dressed up fully clothed for example, and more for "publication rights" than just "use in private but do not share" rights.
It's not easy working on these gameshows. You're just minding your own business, doing your job, when all of a sudden you're getting roped into testing the gunge tank
kemistry said: Have the bing filters become relaxed I notice people able to generate topless images?
Yes! I got two by accident, with one happening just seconds before I updated this post. I just said that she's barefoot in jeans. I just presumed that she'd wear a shirt. Next thing I know, I see the end result, and she's topless.
The first image isn't exactly all that great, since... well, I'll post it this weekend, and you'll see.
kemistry said: Have the bing filters become relaxed I notice people able to generate topless images?
TOTALLY depends on the day, time of day, server you might be signed into, luck, etc. I can be getting 4 topless images back every time I click "generate". I cap out on generations, log into a different account, and can't produce a single image with the same prompt. I can also be producing 4 topless images at a time, every time, then the clock hits 3am and I can't make anything anymore. For about a week I KNEW I could get great images between 9pm and 3am, as if Bing had a "night mode for adults" or something lol. Then it just went away. I have had some really good days since then, but they are few and far between. Today I can't seem to produce even fully clothed tame stuff.
kemistry said: Have the bing filters become relaxed I notice people able to generate topless images?
If the mess covers the 'naughty bits' enough that the filter doesn't recognise them, they have always gone through the filter. I've had several 'topless' pics, 'hand-bras', and one bottomless pic from Bing - unfortunately these have other problems that stop me using them (six-fingered hands, two left feet etc).
The filter settings do seem to ebb and flow, and do also seem to vary each time I log in. There was a period around the beginning of May when the filters seemed noticeably more relaxed, I was getting four images every time, more big breasts, bikinis, tube tops. micro skirts - other people seemed to as well.
As kemistry brought up recently, Bing seems to have given us topless models, in a couple of results.
This wasn't the best of what I came up with, but I wanted to post it.
She's clearly topless, as you can see. She is "wearing" something, due to the prompt, but it looks like she isn't getting sprayed by it, but it spraying it.
I have better ones, where they are still topless. Thanks, Bing!
I'm trying out some new prompts and stuff, and finally managed to get a bit of nudity on my ai. I must admit they're not fantastic, but I'm getting there slowly.
kemistry said: Clothed and in the office, tried to get a bit more life in the facial expressions
WetGownsLover said:
kemistry said: wet and messy
Where you making these images what are you using?
Its an SDXL model (Stable Diffusion).
Will you ever release some of your models? It'd be great to try out the chega mais pie style one you have on your 2023 album someday...
Im not sure how tbh, I dont want to put them on Civitai which is the main place and the models are 7GB so not something easy to share. The LoRA I made for the last post is 780MB which again is still big for sharing.
I'm trying out some new prompts and stuff, and finally managed to get a bit of nudity on my ai. I must admit they're not fantastic, but I'm getting there slowly.
It's been a while, so figured I'd upload a new batch of creations. I went through a stretch where I wasn't totally thrilled with a lot of my creations, so may be a couple here that have some imperfections, but I really liked the outfit/setting/expression, so I overlooked some issues that I normally wouldn't accept. I've been really happy with some recent images, so I've included some that I'm quite proud of. As usual, my personal preference leans towards formal wear, so there's lots of that, but there is some other clothing types mixed in. First, some wetlook images:
Got back into a Bing creation binge recently and decided to add a futuristic element to the game-show formula. I was getting some good results when I noticed a new option in the image details - resize.
This function will take the generated image and re-generate a higher definition version in 4:3 aspect ratio - 1792 X 1024 resolution.
It doesn't just change the aspect though, it incorporates all of the original image properties and creates an entirely new image with discernible similarities. Consequently entire assets or subjects will be altered or re-positioned.
Selecting this option will open the image in a new tab and commence the re-generation process, which typically takes 15-30 seconds to complete. You'll see a pale white preview window with subtle color changes.
It's not always successful however, so if it takes any more than a minute it's unlikely to produce a result. It doesn't consume boost credits, but will fail if you're at the prompt limit.
Perfect for desktop backgrounds or as screensaver images for sweet dreams.