LeRex said: Do others just use 1 particular generator, or are multiple programs/apps used?
I now mostly use Flux and don't do anything further.
But when I used Bing, I always ran the images through Krea afterwards, with a prompt to boost visibility of body features. Here is a 'straight-from-Bing' and 'enhanced-with-Krea' comparison. Krea also does amazing things with faces, without even being prompted to.
Continuing my bath style pics from before, here are some more. In general. I'm pleased, but I am getting random artifacts in some, the odd extra limb etc. Slowly getting there.
LeRex said: Continuing my bath style pics from before, here are some more. In general. I'm pleased, but I am getting random artifacts in some, the odd extra limb etc. Slowly getting there.
Is that with the base dev model or are you training a lora for them?
I've been having a lot of fun with Flux, but I can't find a good pie in the face LORA. Something simple with just whipped cream. I tried to train one off of youtube video screenshots but the quality was terrible. Good coverage and rendering, but everything was blurry. If anyone has suggestions for either training data, LORAs or prompting I'd appreciate it.
For now, some simple pie tease photos created using Flux of a messy mistress and her submissive WAM girl.
I tried to make a whipped cream on faces Flux LORA by clipping screenshots of online videos. It's blurry as heck, as you'd expect, but the results seem ok given a large enough sample size. I wish I had higher quality training data
Another round, mostly wet, a few messy. I've been working with ideogram this week, so quite a few of these originate from there, though there are a few from other sources. I really like the wetlook capabilities of ideogram, but I seem to have mixed success getting the results I want. Some inputs work great, others, not so much. I'm still not great at mess with ideogram, more often than not it looks too artificial for my liking.
0b1000101 said: I tried to make a whipped cream on faces Flux LORA by clipping screenshots of online videos. It's blurry as heck, as you'd expect, but the results seem ok given a large enough sample size. I wish I had higher quality training data
They're not bad at all. Flux does a really good job even with 512x512 images. The key is trying to get a frame of video without blurring. You may have an easier time downloading the video and using some video software that makes it easier to run frame by frame so you can pick the clearest. I would also say, it's much better if your image set is as varied as possible. 20 frames from the same scene isn't going to give as good as result as 20 from different scenes. Different poses, woman, clothing etc is going to net you better results.
Once you've got you screen grabs, you need to normalise the sizing. you really want to crop the screenshots to 512 or 1024 depending on the resolution of the image. If resizing to 1024 gives a blurry image, drop it down to 512. It's also a good opportunity to re-frame too.
With captioning, Flux is very flexibly and people are still trying to understand the best way of captioning. I've had great results with highly description natural language. Anything between 100-200 tokens to fully describe the scene. That said, I've also had great results from 3 word captions too.
I'm seriously impressed with fastflux.ai Seems to actually follow instructions and understand most things. It's not as heavily customisable post+hoc as your midjourneys etc, but it's much easier to use and pretty consistent (and uncensored AND blazingly quick!)
I'm still not great at mess with ideogram, more often than not it looks too artificial for my liking.
These are pretty good! Honestly, I'd say that even the not so great ideogram results are still much better and more realistic than the best one from Bing. Lately I've been also playing around with ideogram a lot and will upload some results, although they usually don't tend to get much attention round her.
Here's a few more from my custard splat set. Using Flux and Krea, with a few on a training lora, but still getting use to doing the training bit. It's all very trail and error, but getting there.
Just a few silly pics I made with a slightly tweaked LORA. I'm working on a new one now trained at 512x512 and hoping that increases the quality. I tried to upscale my training images with krea.ai but they looked so different I didn't like it. Anyway, bring these ladies to life and add some captions!
Nancy seems to end up with all the mucky jobs. I don't think she minds, though. And she always stays cheerful and professional when dealing with dissatisfied clients.
Ok, I took my earlier "WAM girl" concept of a submissive with her mistress and made a party of it. The neighborhood wives are invited to witness this WAM girl get pied and slimed for their viewing pleasure.
It contains two animated gif slimings (the last two images), and some full-facial coverage pieings (not animated). I'm trying to figure out how to mix them more, but still working on the prompting and training data. Still no joy on animating actual pieings - they end up looking grotesque and way uncanny valley, but maybe my prompting is lacking.
0b1000101 said: Ok, I took my earlier "WAM girl" concept of a submissive with her mistress and made a party of it. The neighborhood wives are invited to witness this WAM girl get pied and slimed for their viewing pleasure.
It contains two animated gif slimings (the last two images), and some full-facial coverage pieings (not animated). I'm trying to figure out how to mix them more, but still working on the prompting and training data. Still no joy on animating actual pieings - they end up looking grotesque and way uncanny valley, but maybe my prompting is lacking.
Anyway, add some captions!
Which website or app do you use to generate these images? Is it paid or free?