|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"Dms85 Games Forum Court"
Those veterans amongst you may remember that I use to operate a forum court where members could make petitions where they felt another game forum member had been over enthusiastic.
Both sides would be heard and then judgement would be served. The most harshest of crimes would often lead to the guilty party being sent to the no reply zone.
Ive decide to resurrect the game as it was popular, fun, and because it adds an alternative dynamic.
To be eligible you must
1) Both parties to have posted in one of the games forums in the last seven days
2) dm your submission to me
I'll then contact the accused and set up the public trial.
Both sides will be available to set up a plea and make one statement of defence.
Where clear evidence shows guilt, I, as the Prince of Slops will give a verdict and hand down the sentence. If you're found guilty you will receive a messy sentence fitting of your crime. If you are innocent the complainant will receive a punishment for wasting court time.
Where the evidence is not clear, a vote from the peers will be cast to determine whether there is any guilt.
All sentences will be adhered to personal limits as indicated on profiles.
Both sides would be heard and then judgement would be served. The most harshest of crimes would often lead to the guilty party being sent to the no reply zone.
Ive decide to resurrect the game as it was popular, fun, and because it adds an alternative dynamic.
To be eligible you must
1) Both parties to have posted in one of the games forums in the last seven days
2) dm your submission to me
I'll then contact the accused and set up the public trial.
Both sides will be available to set up a plea and make one statement of defence.
Where clear evidence shows guilt, I, as the Prince of Slops will give a verdict and hand down the sentence. If you're found guilty you will receive a messy sentence fitting of your crime. If you are innocent the complainant will receive a punishment for wasting court time.
Where the evidence is not clear, a vote from the peers will be cast to determine whether there is any guilt.
All sentences will be adhered to personal limits as indicated on profiles.
Case number 001 Propper Slopper V MIU2
MIU2, a case has been brought against you by Propper Slopper today, 17th December 2024.
The charge against you is that on the 16th and 17th December 2024, you have continually and knowingly made a commitment to complete forfeits in specified attire but have done so falsely and have no intention of seeing the forfeit through. In addition, you are accused of overly protesting with Propper Slopper on the issue and deemed to be acting outside of good faith and well intentions as per the customs of our dear forum.
You have until 10pm GMT to submit your plea of guilty or not guilty. If you do not make a plea by that time this court will assume you are making a plea of not guilty and the case against will be heard by this Court.
MIU2, a case has been brought against you by Propper Slopper today, 17th December 2024.
The charge against you is that on the 16th and 17th December 2024, you have continually and knowingly made a commitment to complete forfeits in specified attire but have done so falsely and have no intention of seeing the forfeit through. In addition, you are accused of overly protesting with Propper Slopper on the issue and deemed to be acting outside of good faith and well intentions as per the customs of our dear forum.
You have until 10pm GMT to submit your plea of guilty or not guilty. If you do not make a plea by that time this court will assume you are making a plea of not guilty and the case against will be heard by this Court.
Thank you MIU2
Propper Slopper, you have until 10pm this evening submit your case in full including any evidence.
MIU2. Once Propper Slopper has submitted his case in full, including any evidence, you will be able to respond.
You will then both have the opportunity to make a closing statement before this Court considers a verdict.
Propper Slopper, you have until 10pm this evening submit your case in full including any evidence.
MIU2. Once Propper Slopper has submitted his case in full, including any evidence, you will be able to respond.
You will then both have the opportunity to make a closing statement before this Court considers a verdict.
Proper Slopper said:
Thank you your honour.
The defendant stands accused of misrepresentation and wanton disregard for WAM games forum etiquette and social convention. Exhibit A clearly shows MIU2 accepting his punishment as that being to compete the Survivor 47 Messy Wedgie Wheel forfeit. A punishment handed down after begging me to set him a messy dare.
Further to that it was later stipulated that MIU2 was required to perform said forfeit in frilly knickers. Something he now denies knowledge of. Yet Exhibit B clearly shows MIU2 accepted this battleships game, lost to DMS85 and was subsequently required to wear the requisite attire.
In closing I put forth to the court that MIU2 be forced to complete the forfeit as agreed in the selected attire as agreed without further argument.
Thank you.
Dms85 said: Thank you MIU2
Propper Slopper, you have until 10pm this evening submit your case in full including any evidence.
MIU2. Once Propper Slopper has submitted his case in full, including any evidence, you will be able to respond.
You will then both have the opportunity to make a closing statement before this Court considers a verdict.
Propper Slopper, you have until 10pm this evening submit your case in full including any evidence.
MIU2. Once Propper Slopper has submitted his case in full, including any evidence, you will be able to respond.
You will then both have the opportunity to make a closing statement before this Court considers a verdict.
Thank you your honour.
The defendant stands accused of misrepresentation and wanton disregard for WAM games forum etiquette and social convention. Exhibit A clearly shows MIU2 accepting his punishment as that being to compete the Survivor 47 Messy Wedgie Wheel forfeit. A punishment handed down after begging me to set him a messy dare.
Further to that it was later stipulated that MIU2 was required to perform said forfeit in frilly knickers. Something he now denies knowledge of. Yet Exhibit B clearly shows MIU2 accepted this battleships game, lost to DMS85 and was subsequently required to wear the requisite attire.
In closing I put forth to the court that MIU2 be forced to complete the forfeit as agreed in the selected attire as agreed without further argument.
Thank you.
I dispute this. It clearly shows that I can wear any underwear of my choice. I also have 7 days to carry it out so I am still in time. I made proper slopper aware that I can't do it yet so I did an undies sauce filling off my own back. He is changing the rules as he goes.
I also didn't play a battleship game with Dms85 as it clearly shows on the forum that he got the rules wrong. His honour judge Dms85 can vouch for that as well. I will not be wearing frilly knickers as I am being bullied into this
 Love you, too |
MUI2, can you please confirm that your statement is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Please be aware that should evidence be presented that contradicts this will mean that you may also be found guilty of perverting the course of justice and contempt of this court.
Your honour I would like to point out that there is no evidence of me playing battleships however there is evidence in the attached photo to show that I was excluded from battleships because proper slopper was making up rules and dragging me into a forum I wasn't part of. This evidence comes from you as the judge.
I am innocent in all this and should be free to go
I am innocent in all this and should be free to go
|
Love you, too |
Hearing outcome Case 001 Propper Slopper V MIU2
Consideration has been given for the arguments made by the plaintiff, and the defendant. This is a complex scenario with several dimensions which need to be considered in determining whether MIU2 is guilty. These are
1) The sub contract agreed between both parties including the agreement to perform certain tasks
2) Whether commitments in other games are a critical determining factor in the sub contract agreement
3) whether there are grounds that MIU2 is engaging with games in good faith.
I am satisfied by the evidence submitted by Propper Slopper that MIU2 has knowingly and willingly accepted that he is a sub to Propper Slopper. Although the details of the agreement are not clear, there are no limits specified on MUI2 account therefore it is reasonable to assume that requests made by Propper Slopper have been done so in good faith.
However, MIU2 has provided sufficient evidence that in regard to the agreement specifically relating to the messie wedgie game, he has not breached terms agreed per their chat, namely, that it will be completed in 7 days and in underwear of his choice.
The question is what bearing the battleship game affects the outcome. MUI2, your defence related to the 'If you don't reply' can not be accepted by the court. I can see no justification as to how that post has any determining factor. Propper Slopper has not referred to that battleship game as the game in question, instead he has referred to a private game between you and I. In your defence statement you stated that the game had not taken place, and when pressed on the matter you stated that you were telling the truth. However, you know that this is not the case as per the attached. You instigated the game and set out the terms. Propper Slopper in this regard has only been carrying out the actions based in your own design. You have knowingly and willingly distorted the truth to the court in an attempt to get the outcome you wanted.
That said, it is clear that the contract in this regard is between you and I as the players of the battle game and as the outcome has been carried out, I can't say that this agreement has been breached. Although the commitment to wearing the knickers is implied, it's application and in which forfeit was not specified.
Finally, considering the matter as to whether you have been engaging with the games in good faith, although agreements have not been breached, I am satisfied by the evidence presented by Propper Slopper, in that you make a point of saying 'nobody else knows about it - I can get away with it' you have not acted with good faith. It is clear you made a commitment which you then later regretted and have attempted to deceive in order to hide your guilt.
In summary, I pass down the following verdict
Has MIU2 breached the terms of the agreement relating to the Messie Wedgie Game? Not guilty
Breaching the agreement relating to the knickers? Not guilty
Acting outside of good faith and disregarding our customs? Guilty
Lying to the court on 2 occasions? Guilty
Although MIU2 has been found not guilty on two accounts, I am satisfied that Propper Slopper made his complaint with good faith and will not receive a punishment, especially as two guilty verdicts have been given.
MUI2, any last words before sentencing?
Consideration has been given for the arguments made by the plaintiff, and the defendant. This is a complex scenario with several dimensions which need to be considered in determining whether MIU2 is guilty. These are
1) The sub contract agreed between both parties including the agreement to perform certain tasks
2) Whether commitments in other games are a critical determining factor in the sub contract agreement
3) whether there are grounds that MIU2 is engaging with games in good faith.
I am satisfied by the evidence submitted by Propper Slopper that MIU2 has knowingly and willingly accepted that he is a sub to Propper Slopper. Although the details of the agreement are not clear, there are no limits specified on MUI2 account therefore it is reasonable to assume that requests made by Propper Slopper have been done so in good faith.
However, MIU2 has provided sufficient evidence that in regard to the agreement specifically relating to the messie wedgie game, he has not breached terms agreed per their chat, namely, that it will be completed in 7 days and in underwear of his choice.
The question is what bearing the battleship game affects the outcome. MUI2, your defence related to the 'If you don't reply' can not be accepted by the court. I can see no justification as to how that post has any determining factor. Propper Slopper has not referred to that battleship game as the game in question, instead he has referred to a private game between you and I. In your defence statement you stated that the game had not taken place, and when pressed on the matter you stated that you were telling the truth. However, you know that this is not the case as per the attached. You instigated the game and set out the terms. Propper Slopper in this regard has only been carrying out the actions based in your own design. You have knowingly and willingly distorted the truth to the court in an attempt to get the outcome you wanted.
That said, it is clear that the contract in this regard is between you and I as the players of the battle game and as the outcome has been carried out, I can't say that this agreement has been breached. Although the commitment to wearing the knickers is implied, it's application and in which forfeit was not specified.
Finally, considering the matter as to whether you have been engaging with the games in good faith, although agreements have not been breached, I am satisfied by the evidence presented by Propper Slopper, in that you make a point of saying 'nobody else knows about it - I can get away with it' you have not acted with good faith. It is clear you made a commitment which you then later regretted and have attempted to deceive in order to hide your guilt.
In summary, I pass down the following verdict
Has MIU2 breached the terms of the agreement relating to the Messie Wedgie Game? Not guilty
Breaching the agreement relating to the knickers? Not guilty
Acting outside of good faith and disregarding our customs? Guilty
Lying to the court on 2 occasions? Guilty
Although MIU2 has been found not guilty on two accounts, I am satisfied that Propper Slopper made his complaint with good faith and will not receive a punishment, especially as two guilty verdicts have been given.
MUI2, any last words before sentencing?
|
Love you, too |
Your honour this is wrong. I am not guilty for all charges. I don't deserve to be sentenced for anything. proper slopper has been out to get me from the start. Threatening to make me wear knickers and to be his slop bitch. The stress of it all has made me act in a strange way but I am not guilty
Your reluctance to take responsibility at this stage is disappointing but not at all surprising given the offences you are guilty of and this will be taken into account when sentencing.
MIU2, you have been found guilty of engaging with games lacking good faith and lying to the court on two accounts. You are hearby sentenced with 'you must play the bucket game with the following conditions, no specified items, time period of 24 hours, recatches allowed after one hour' your outfit will be determined by a public vote with the options specified by your dom, Propper Slopper.
Case closed.
MIU2, you have been found guilty of engaging with games lacking good faith and lying to the court on two accounts. You are hearby sentenced with 'you must play the bucket game with the following conditions, no specified items, time period of 24 hours, recatches allowed after one hour' your outfit will be determined by a public vote with the options specified by your dom, Propper Slopper.
Case closed.
Case Number 002 Kinkpigmcr v Daningunge
DanInGunge, a case has been brought against you by KinkPigMCR that on this day, 18th December 2024, you posted in the Bucket Game in violation of the rules of said game. KinkPigMCR is seeking severe punishment for you due to this violation.
You have until 10pm GMT to submit a plea of guilty or not guilty. If no plea is submitted by this time, this court will assume a plea of not guilty and the case will be heard.
DanInGunge, a case has been brought against you by KinkPigMCR that on this day, 18th December 2024, you posted in the Bucket Game in violation of the rules of said game. KinkPigMCR is seeking severe punishment for you due to this violation.
You have until 10pm GMT to submit a plea of guilty or not guilty. If no plea is submitted by this time, this court will assume a plea of not guilty and the case will be heard.
Although a plea has not been made by Daningunge, as he has not been on line since his summons, the court will adjourn till 8am GMT at the latest to allow Daningunge to make a plea.
Although timeframes are important, a fair opportunity is more important and allowances must be made for people that may live in different time zones.
Should a plea not be received by 8am GMT, then a plea of not guilty will be assumed.
I would recommend that the plaintiff uses this time to review the robustness of his case against the defendant to ensure that the severity of punishment he is seeking is proportionate to the charges and not a waist of this courts time.
Court adjourned to 8am GMT.
Although timeframes are important, a fair opportunity is more important and allowances must be made for people that may live in different time zones.
Should a plea not be received by 8am GMT, then a plea of not guilty will be assumed.
I would recommend that the plaintiff uses this time to review the robustness of his case against the defendant to ensure that the severity of punishment he is seeking is proportionate to the charges and not a waist of this courts time.
Court adjourned to 8am GMT.
I plead not guilty
The rules of the Bucket Game are simple:
1. Set an interval
2. Provide a list of ingredients
Dan in gunge neither set an interval, nor provided a list.
Further, the fun of the game is that the target is in until he has not been caught within the interval set, Dan tried to set himself a time he was the target.
The integrity of games is critical to the functioning of this website. If we just use every game as a simple "tell me what to gunge myself with" the fun of the games is lost
1. Set an interval
2. Provide a list of ingredients
Dan in gunge neither set an interval, nor provided a list.
Further, the fun of the game is that the target is in until he has not been caught within the interval set, Dan tried to set himself a time he was the target.
The integrity of games is critical to the functioning of this website. If we just use every game as a simple "tell me what to gunge myself with" the fun of the games is lost
|
Love you, too |
|
Love you, too |
I was in a rush and forgot the rules your honour.
Thank you DanInGunge
I can't see the value of dragging this out further. If the plaintiff can respond to the statement from the defendant and outline the punishment they are seeking.
DanInGunge, is there anything else you wish to state you may also submit this to the court.
Both sides have until 4:30pm GMT. I will then consider a verdict. Please be aware I reserve the right to consider counsel from others on this matter should I feel necessary.
I can't see the value of dragging this out further. If the plaintiff can respond to the statement from the defendant and outline the punishment they are seeking.
DanInGunge, is there anything else you wish to state you may also submit this to the court.
Both sides have until 4:30pm GMT. I will then consider a verdict. Please be aware I reserve the right to consider counsel from others on this matter should I feel necessary.
Design & Code ©1998-2025 Loverbuns, LLC 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Epoch Billing Support Log In