For all you AI'ers... I have noticed that Qwen does not have very strict nudity checks or any real checks at all going on. I'm sure you all know how annoying these are. Most have a secondary AI model that will examine all your images for 'policy violations' before displaying the result. Super annoying after you waited all that time for an image and it returns nothing.

Qwen is very capable image generator but not half as good as Nano Banana for producing WAM. But if you take an image from Nano and ask Qwen to remove an article of clothing it does it. Sometimes if you specify key words like 'panties' or 'breasts' then they will tell you that violates their policy even before trying to generate an image so you have to be careful with that. But it is fine removing shirts or whatever. It replaces the shirt with whatever it thinks is appropriate. Sometimes it gives just a 'ken doll' set of privates where there is no detail whatsoever in the key region. Or if the girl has been wammed, then it will just put mess there.

Either way good stuff to know. I suspect the Chinese had copied the Google flash image create model which had this effect as a 'bug' until Google fixed theirs.

Also.. useful site called LM Arena allows you to test out multiple AI models without creating an account which is nice.

That's good to know, thanks.

Qwen used to have (IMO) the best video generator of all, and then after an update they completely broke it. I tried it again recently and it was still broken, even if you choose earlier models.

QWEN still is the best open source image generator. The mistake you're making is assuming they're going to train on porn and fetishes and also allow you to generate said images. The same can be applied to nanobanana and the new nanobanana model that will release very soon.

That said, if you can run locally it does very well.

I think for now it is more fun to create AI images than to actually believe/expect them to look real. Nothing quite yet replaces the real thing.

I'm surprised how many topless/nude results I've gotten on Gemini. The thing is... I wasn't asking for toplessness/nudity. I guess that the wording of my prompt allowed the results to be seen a certain way.

And how many nude or topless pictures are of any decent quality. 2 years ago, you could prompt and work around Dalle-3 and produce the same level of nudity. Every "nude" pic I've seen from gemini, looks no better than a mannequin or barbie. What is even the point at that level.. Unless you like dolls of course..

There were nipples in my end result. I was surprised how many times it happened.