Someone suggest using https://gemini.google.com to generate wetlook images. (They also mentioned something about slideshow or continuity, but I didn't pay much attention.) So I thought I'd try it out. The 8 images below are my first attempts. But with the 9th one, something began to happen - as you'll see in the comment below when I get uploaded....

So starting with the 9th images, I kept the number of ladies to 3 and kept the hair color order unchanged. Just by tweaking the prompts, unintended continuity began to emerge.

Of course, that wasn't enough for intentional quality continuity. So I worked a bit harder on the next set, which will appear in a comment below this one.

So this time I kept the 3 ladies, their hair color order unchanged and the clothes color pegged to the hair color. It's still not perfect continuity, but not bad for less than 10 minutes work. It probably could be improved by specifying the style of the blouses and the lengths of the hair.

I have no idea what this will do for pies, slime, and other messes!

A lovely progression.
Great outfits.

Gemini is really great for wetlook pictures and got even better with the latest versions and its filters got more allowing than so many other engines.

I've had a ton of luck with Google's Imagen 3 (ImageFX) and Imagen 4 (Whisk), so much so that I've pretty much stopped using any other generators. I don't really do NSFW stuff, but some of what I do make is clearly sexual in nature. I've been surprised to find that a lot of words that would get immediate blocks on other generators seem completely unrestricted by Google's generators. Stuff that I used to have to trick Bing or other generators into making can be done directly with Imagen. Unfortunately it still struggles with action shot-style images, but I can usually get it to do what I want with some prompt tweaking. Except jumping, falling, and diving into water. It's weird that AI struggles with such simple concepts that are so widely photographed and readily available online.

It's crazy how far image generation has come in such a short time!

Yes, the more I've used ImageFX, the more I'm impressed. And I know what you mean about "jumping, falling, and diving into water." That was one of the first things I attempted over a year ago when I started creating wetlook images. The results were mostly disappointing. I used ImageFX this week with so-so results. After I try again with ideaogram 3.0 this weekend, I'll post what I've managed to get so far - better than a year ago, but still disappointing.