|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"Found this in my stash!"
Love you, too
Hi,
Just thought you'd like to see this cutting from a vintage copy of Razzle I came across. I am guessing this from the end of the 80s. Before the Internet and Splosh Magazine this publication was one of the gotos for this type of stuff. Pretty tame by today's standards, but we had to make do back then!
Just thought you'd like to see this cutting from a vintage copy of Razzle I came across. I am guessing this from the end of the 80s. Before the Internet and Splosh Magazine this publication was one of the gotos for this type of stuff. Pretty tame by today's standards, but we had to make do back then!
Nice find in your stash. It's always good when you stumble across an old wam pic.
Cream crackers, appeared as just snippets, there was also a shower one which showed girls, well in a shower or just getting wet. Over time they became proper photo spreads, the infamous Razzle Romps.
Cream crackers, appeared as just snippets, there was also a shower one which showed girls, well in a shower or just getting wet. Over time they became proper photo spreads, the infamous Razzle Romps.
I've got a pie, and I know how the throw it.
LeRex said: Nice find in your stash. It's always good when you stumble across an old wam pic.
Cream crackers, appeared as just snippets, there was also a shower one which showed girls, well in a shower or just getting wet. Over time they became proper photo spreads, the infamous Razzle Romps.
Cream crackers, appeared as just snippets, there was also a shower one which showed girls, well in a shower or just getting wet. Over time they became proper photo spreads, the infamous Razzle Romps.
I have another edition of said publication with one such of these 'romps'. I will try and get it scanned and put up if I can. I think it is probably from the same era. 4 girls getting completely covered in paint. There was also another I had with a girl pouring rice pudding all over herself, but that seems to be missing. She was called 'Amber' I remember that much and getting very excited over it!
I am really starting to appreciate these old shots and vintage WAM. It is amazing to know that these 'girls' are probably grandmothers by now! How times flies...
T x
FYI the Razzle and Fiesta UK girlie mags were owned by Paul Raymond (the UK Hugh Hefner) and one of his main writers and content providers was none other than Bill Shipton, who worked for Raymond for several years.
Many of the wet and messy photosets in those magazines were instigated by Bill Shipton ....
.... who later created his own magazine called "Splosh" in 1989.
It is no accident that wam media articles and photosets were often seen in the Fiesta and Razzle magazines in the 70's and early 80s, because the godfather of WAM, Bill Shipton, was often behind it,
Many of the wet and messy photosets in those magazines were instigated by Bill Shipton ....
.... who later created his own magazine called "Splosh" in 1989.
It is no accident that wam media articles and photosets were often seen in the Fiesta and Razzle magazines in the 70's and early 80s, because the godfather of WAM, Bill Shipton, was often behind it,
Do unto others, then run
Dessert_Trolley said:
I have another edition of said publication with one such of these 'romps'. I will try and get it scanned and put up if I can. I think it is probably from the same era. 4 girls getting completely covered in paint. There was also another I had with a girl pouring rice pudding all over herself, but that seems to be missing. She was called 'Amber' I remember that much and getting very excited over it!
I am really starting to appreciate these old shots and vintage WAM. It is amazing to know that these 'girls' are probably grandmothers by now! How times flies...
T x
LeRex said: Nice find in your stash. It's always good when you stumble across an old wam pic.
Cream crackers, appeared as just snippets, there was also a shower one which showed girls, well in a shower or just getting wet. Over time they became proper photo spreads, the infamous Razzle Romps.
Cream crackers, appeared as just snippets, there was also a shower one which showed girls, well in a shower or just getting wet. Over time they became proper photo spreads, the infamous Razzle Romps.
I have another edition of said publication with one such of these 'romps'. I will try and get it scanned and put up if I can. I think it is probably from the same era. 4 girls getting completely covered in paint. There was also another I had with a girl pouring rice pudding all over herself, but that seems to be missing. She was called 'Amber' I remember that much and getting very excited over it!
I am really starting to appreciate these old shots and vintage WAM. It is amazing to know that these 'girls' are probably grandmothers by now! How times flies...
T x
Loved the shower scenes. I remember an issue that had several girls getting wet, probably in the 'romp style', really very sexy, even on the cover, but sadly can't find it anywhere. Razzle in NL was short lived anyway if I'm not mistaken.
wamtec said: FYI the Razzle and Fiesta UK girlie mags were owned by Paul Raymond (the UK Hugh Hefner) and one of his main writers and content providers was none other than Bill Shipton, who worked for Raymond for several years.
Many of the wet and messy photosets in those magazines were instigated by Bill Shipton ....
.... who later created his own magazine called "Splosh" in 1989.
It is no accident that wam media articles and photosets were often seen in the Fiesta and Razzle magazines in the 70's and early 80s, because the godfather of WAM, Bill Shipton, was often behind it,
Many of the wet and messy photosets in those magazines were instigated by Bill Shipton ....
.... who later created his own magazine called "Splosh" in 1989.
It is no accident that wam media articles and photosets were often seen in the Fiesta and Razzle magazines in the 70's and early 80s, because the godfather of WAM, Bill Shipton, was often behind it,
Yes, I sort of vaguely remember this being the case, but thanks for confirming the facts. RIP Bill. I think everyone here owes him a lot!
If my custard soaked memory serves me correct, the working relationship with Bill and Paul (Raymond) wasn't smooth, as Paul had very different ideas of how his magazines should look and wasn't keen on the messy sets, and that people didn't want to see it (how wrong he was). This obviously was part reason I would assume why Bill produced his own magazines, and thank goodness he did.
Obviously around this time WAM was seen as a very odd kink, why would people like tipping the contents of the kitchen cupboard and fridge over themselves? Due to this it was an ideal topic to feature on late night, obscure TV shows, but it was all great publicity for Bill. (He was even caricatured a number of times in Viz (the adult comic).
Yes, Bill you are sadly missed, and we owe you so much. Stand in line people and doff your cap, to a truly great man .
Obviously around this time WAM was seen as a very odd kink, why would people like tipping the contents of the kitchen cupboard and fridge over themselves? Due to this it was an ideal topic to feature on late night, obscure TV shows, but it was all great publicity for Bill. (He was even caricatured a number of times in Viz (the adult comic).
Yes, Bill you are sadly missed, and we owe you so much. Stand in line people and doff your cap, to a truly great man .
I've got a pie, and I know how the throw it.
LeRex said: Paul had very different ideas of how his magazines should look and wasn't keen on the messy sets, and that people didn't want to see it (how wrong he was). This obviously was part reason I would assume why Bill produced his own magazines, and thank goodness he did.
You are right, but Raymond was not wrong. Raymond was a multi millionaire adult magazine mogul and he was a business man who wanted to sell hundreds of thousands of magazines, so he wanted to have media that would sell well. In those days there were only a hundred or so wam fans so why would Raymond want to produce media that could not sell many magazines....
....so that is why Bill started his own magazine instead....and just compare the circulations. Bill could only sell a few hundred Splosh magazines whereas Raymond could sell hundreds of thousands of his magazines....so Raymond was right. He wanted to sell magazines to make him Rich. Whereas Bill created his magazine knowing he would never get rich and only sell a few magazines, and so Bill created his magazine as a labor of love, but it was not a profitable enterprise.
Do unto others, then run
Sadly missed is Bill.
I think he passed away 2013, 22th July.
I think he passed away 2013, 22th July.
Always give 100%. Unless you're donating blood.
matt2matt2002 said: Sadly missed is Bill.
I think he passed away 2013, 22th July.
I think he passed away 2013, 22th July.
Bill Shipton passed away (suddenly) on the 5th July 2013. He was 57.
A great loss to many, and a huge whole created in the WAM community.
So it'll be 12 years this year since his passing. In tribute, I think we should pie ourselves with a dozen pies, and salute the great man.
I've got a pie, and I know how the throw it.
Bill Shipton passed away (suddenly) on the 5th July 2013. He was 57.
A great loss to many, and a huge whole created in the WAM community.
A great loss to many, and a huge whole created in the WAM community.
That's worrying, I'll be 57 in a few days time. That is no age to die at. Now you got me panicking I should be doing more messy stuff before I keel over...
Anyone else here worried about not leading an 'action packed' life?
Design & Code ©1998-2025 Loverbuns, LLC 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Epoch Billing Support Log In