AI so far cannot replace the impact ON ME from something like the screengrab here. The fact that its a real live woman makes it special.

This is from Slapstick Stuff's latest. Is there a name for that sort of skirt? I'd like to see what Bing AI does with it. I'm sure "school girl" will trip all sorts of warnings and penalties.

I agree.
There is a place for both AI images and the real thing.

BUT, there is nothing quite as good as a REAL clean and pretty woman ending filthy (IMHO).

For me, the interaction is key. Seeing women I don't know getting messy can be hot. But communicating with her, perhaps challenging each other, tell and fulfil whishes, etc. makes the whole experience so much better.

And for me, AI comes closer to interacting WAM than real women. Just because there are no real cute women who are willing to get personal, except when I pay hundreds of dollars for a custom.

So I really love reap humans getting messy, but AI is more available for me and so, gives me more satisfaction.

I have to be honest I feel the AI wam picture images I have seen are simply outstanding and if the tech advances to moving scenes then I really look forward to it . I seen the wam fetish media go from paper publications to VHS tape to DVD and digital . It also has to be said that Wam fetish is resource heavy requiring either food or other messy substances and water and heat for the clean up plus clothes and the travel for the model , with AI generated download scenes that would be a thing of the past .
Yes we have established producers ,and there will always be a need for real wam . and thankfully there are models still willing to do the scenes . But I have also seen a lot of producers come and go and not in a good way which gives the impression they are in it to make a quick buck, and were never into the fetish .

The skirt the model is wearing is called a Pleated mini skirt .

Does it make a difference if you don't know it's AI?

Personally, I really prefer seeing real pictures because my eyes are drawn to the generation errors in AI images and it can distract me from seeing the full pictures. But some look so realistic that I can genuinely appreciate the full picture. It is a bit frustrating to make an image where the model is just completely amazing in some way or another, but then realizing that you'll never see another picture of that person.


I totally agree here, but maybe for a different reason. I love the interaction, but in my real life, I've only had that genuine shared WAM-related interaction with one person and sadly, that relationship was doomed from the start.

What I love most about AI is that it caters entirely to what I want, because, well, it tries to do exactly what I asked it to. (Ok, that didn't come out quite right, but I think you get the idea.) AI is customizable. On a site like this, the real content is focused around the creator's personal desires or the desires of their most vocal audience members, and limited by their budget, the models' agree-ability, and whatever other limitations a shoot might have.

With AI like ChatGPT, I can let my imagination run wild and I basically have another writer whose only goal is to write MY story. I can add to, rewrite, or ignore what it says without hurting any feelings, and it's getting better and better at keeping events and characters straight. I can guide the story in any direction I want and the AI will follow, no matter how ridiculous it gets. And I don't have to worry about it suddenly taking a hard left turn into hardcore erotica when I'm enjoying the story. It's basically roleplay without the embarrassment of sharing my ideas with another person.

With image generators, I can get what I really want, and what I want is so niche that it rarely appears on this site or anywhere else online. While I appreciate nudity and skimpy clothing, what I want to see is elegantly-dressed women doing things few women would ever even imagine doing while dressed up. I loved the eromaxx/tainster stuff, but without all the sex and pretend anger. And image generators can do exactly what I want.

Obviously, it's not a real person, but the interaction can make it feel closer to the real thing than content that was made for a very different audience than me.


That's something that's kind of bothered me a bit too, along with producers who suddenly quit the scene and take all their content with them, or ones who... well... did bad things and the community chases them out.

For me, there's a time for both real and AI images. In my own images I try to achieve as much realism as possible rather than focussing on extremely special motives.

I'm more into wetlook and I started experimenting with AI simply because no producer made the kind of images I prefer to see, actually they're all focussing on pretty much exactly the same type of (too younf and overly skinny) women.

Agreed. As is obvious, I like women in drop-dead sexy formal dresses, lotsa cleavage, long gloves. Such outfits are probably expensive and the models don't have more than one or two in their closets. You can buy long gloves here in the US for a few dollars a pair but they may not be that cheap in the countries where much of our commercial wetlook is produced.

I'm finding the combination of looking at AI and real very stimulating, even at these early stages of AI.

Yeah, I think that could definitely be part a problem in your case.

And the other thing is - the more special your wishes, the harder it gets. I believe yours will fit many, but there are hardly enough people who share my preference for more clothed(!) curvy women in WAM and Wetlook to be interesting for producers.

I think there's certainly a place for AI, even at its current state of development. It can create images of scenarios that would be prohibitively expensive or labour-intensive to do in reality -- such as historical or science-fictional costumes.

Also, I can be sure with AI-generated images that I haven't contributed to a situation where a human model's been pushed into doing something she really rather wouldn't.