Bobographer said: I've always been censored, since my preference require more skin to be shown. Most AI creation sites won't let you do this.
But I discovered one that lets you create AI images and videos with no restrictions.
It's www.flyne.ai and well worth the cost for a basic membership. You can also purchase credits if you run low or run out.
Here are a few R rated images I've recently created. . .
That's not strictly true. Flyne.ai and others just resell api access to commercial models and have specific finetunes of open models like Qwen, Flux and Krea.ai. The problem is, you will hit the same guardrails as accessing the commercial models directly and you're still reliant on the finetunes being trained to do good wam and/or nudity. Usually this is one or the other.
That's not strictly true. Flyne.ai and others just resell api access to commercial models and have specific finetunes of open models like Qwen, Flux and Krea.ai. The problem is, you will hit the same guardrails as accessing the commercial models directly and you're still reliant on the finetunes being trained to do good wam and/or nudity. Usually this is one or the other.
You're right. For video I'm using VEO 3.1 which seems to accept and create just about anything. For images I use Nano Banana 2 which also doesn't seem to have any restrictions. Through Flyne, you can choose many models of AI generation, so I should have mentioned that. Thanks for making it more clear.
That's not strictly true. Flyne.ai and others just resell api access to commercial models and have specific finetunes of open models like Qwen, Flux and Krea.ai. The problem is, you will hit the same guardrails as accessing the commercial models directly and you're still reliant on the finetunes being trained to do good wam and/or nudity. Usually this is one or the other.
You're right. For video I'm using VEO 3.1 which seems to accept and create just about anything. For images I use Nano Banana 2 which also doesn't seem to have any restrictions. Through Flyne, you can choose many models of AI generation, so I should have mentioned that. Thanks for making it more clear.
I've got an inherent dislike of the many aggregators of AI models that have popped up which seem to offer credit systems to models. Most of them throttle requests and change terms and conditions quite often. They also implement their own restrictions on top of models. If flyne is different, that's great. but the pricing doesn't look great
$19.99 for 10,000 Credits
NB Pro - 50 Credits per image Veo3.1 - 1500 Credits per video
200 Images a month or.. 6 Videos?
I do have to ask though, are you sure that the images you linked are from nanobanana and not Qwen or some other open model that they use. I've never seen NB accept explicit nudity from any source. the guardrails are more relaxed than GPT but both Veo 3.1 and NB are still block any nudity
I do have to ask though, are you sure that the images you linked are from nanobanana and not Qwen or some other open model that they use. I've never seen NB accept explicit nudity from any source. the guardrails are more relaxed than GPT but both Veo 3.1 and NB are still block any nudity
Yes, I just double-checked the models I've been using to generate content. What I do with Flynn is use the lowest price tier, then boost my credits as needed. I don't normally do a lot of this stuff, so I don't need a plan that provides a high volume of output.
I do have to ask though, are you sure that the images you linked are from nanobanana and not Qwen or some other open model that they use. I've never seen NB accept explicit nudity from any source. the guardrails are more relaxed than GPT but both Veo 3.1 and NB are still block any nudity
Yes, I just double-checked the models I've been using to generate content. What I do with Flynn is use the lowest price tier, then boost my credits as needed. I don't normally do a lot of this stuff, so I don't need a plan that provides a high volume of output.
This is going to make me sound like an arse and I'm not trying to be awkward, just highlighting that some of these providers aren't necessarily transparent. I'm 99.9% certain the 8 images are not nanobanana. I can't check for the google synthID which is present on all NB2 and pro images as they reject the image on safety grounds but NB pro doesn't allow nudity in any of their delivery mechanisms whether thats Flow, gemini or api. I can't check EXIF data as it's been stripped out but if you you inspect that or look at file detail in notpad it may tell you the model used.