I tried something more modest than a waterpark. I asked for a special fashion show where the models are walking under an artificial rain, in a catwalk that is a long shallow pool. I don't know in which order you eventually see the pictures I chose for you, but you may guess that I had to redefine many times, asking for instance for small streams of water on the clothes, to get a closer look at the wet fashion. The single models show Bing's interpretation of wet suede.

Adding rain makes things easier, but you don't neccessarily have to - at least if the setting gives you other possibilities to get soaked.

These are joyous images! More please! so perfect.

What settings do you use?

It's the combination of scenery and prompts, things like "coming out of a lake, drenched from swimming" or "in a canoe soaked from water". However I believe this won't work so well in otherwise dry situations like a fashion show.

Here the wet fashion show continues.

Chess is a difficult game if you cannot guess how the opponent reacts to your move. This was the case also with Bing AI, when I tried to create two different scenes. This current one is a small subset of my attempt to have a woman make a gentle diagonal step on a chess board in such a way that a bishop shows between her legs. It was soon obvious that Bing doesn't "know" much about the squares and not too much about the pieces either. But there is wetness, and some redness, too.

The other chess exploration was about two women acting as the queens and shaking hands in a friendly way, because it started raining and the game had to be stopped. This is again just a fraction of even those images that I saved for myself. Learning to use Bing AI seems to require developing some sort of counterintuitive thinking. For instance, if you want the queens to have smaller crowns in the next image do not ask that lest you get bigger ones. Reducing complexity in the prompt may lead to nice results. There are two pictures without the handshake, and of course I had stopped using the word queen quite soon.

Here is an attempt to create wetlook "art" in two ways: "wet in art" and "wet looker of art".
Wet in art was a little easier, but not without complications - like having cars in the painting, including an umbrella or not seeing the face. And from the slightly averaged prompt you can see what else went wrong.

A woman is depicted in the painting "Paris Street; Rainy Day" by Gustave Caillebotte. She is dressed in 1877 clothing that is grayish, brownish, and wet due to the rain. The wetness of the garments can clearly be seen in shiny reflections and in the little streams of water that are flowing on all parts of the dress and dripping off it. The outfit includes a wet long-sleeved blouse, wet pants, and a wet tight-fitting jacket without pockets. All these pieces are glistening from wetness, providing a contrast to the original painting. The woman's shoes are laced, black, and wet, and they are visible.

I'll post later something following three other painters, Constable, van Gogh and Monet. Their style will give interesting opportunities for you, too.

The "wet looker of art" was rather hopeless. At least it taught me that mentioning numeric dimensions or a classic painting does not help. Bing did give a link to the requested painting, though. This was approximately the initial prompt followed by similar specifications of wet clothing (1910s) as above:

Create a photo of a woman in an art museum in front of the painting "Rain, Steam and Speed; The Great Western Railway" by J. M. W. Turner (a real steamy painting, check it and make it correct!). There is a 50cm x 50cm shallow pool in front of the painting and an artificial rain right on top of the pool.

I posted earlier some "singers in the rain". Here are two more. The other women are dressed in their loads of water in front of the poster from the movie "Ultimate pool party" with varying orthography.

Earlier, I promised a golfer in action. Here they are, in a rainy course. And two others got tired and wet in a very dry environment. I added also four images from a different kind of pool. I tried to thicken the club handle and the cue and give them a reddish colour, but there were already too many other details for Bing to ignore.

You may have seen above some attempts to inspire Bing AI by art, and you'll see some more later. Here is a sample of my results from trying to have a colourful "real" woman on a painting canvas supported by two others in black and white, in front of a landscape. The results were something else, of course, and I soon let the supporters go away.

Here are two other unlikely vistas of getting wet. Bing's interpretation of a bucket of an excavator was difficult to get right, and even more so was to make a tub in the shape of a halved bottle.

Here are three more alternatives for a basin where to get wet. I first tried with a parabolic antenna, but it was difficult to get rid of the receiver. And I wanted the dish to be embedded in a long grass. The straws you see next to the model were supposed to be her cushion. No way. Then I tried to make the basin have similar shape as an umbrella upside down. You can guess it didn't work for me. Here are two irregular variations from that experiment, with "oval" or "elliptic" added. Then I tried just to get a tidy pit with a sand bottom.

I promised van Gogh and Monet earlier. The former seemed to be easy for Bing to imitate, but it was difficult to get it show the head of the model. For Monet I wanted to get the model to check her wet hair in a handheld mirror. Here you see two mirrors of somewhat tolerable size and shape. The picture with an umbrella was one of those where Bing added it "automatically". To avoid that I tried to give the model something else to hold. I did propose a shape and colour, but it was not a sausage that I asked for.

Here are some musically inspired wet situations. The duets are just "ordinary", but still difficult. For instance it was too hard for Bing to make one of the saxophones an alto and the other a tenor. My first prompt requested a flute and a bassoon, and as a result you can see a hybrid of a double base, a horn and some woodwind. The purpose of the piano image was to have a grand one serve as a basin for the player's alter ego to enjoy a bath, as if the player were imagining such a feeling through her music. Making a basin out of an upright piano was no less difficult.

I expected to see many others post wet only (i.e. non-messy) images in this thread. Maybe I overestimated the size of the W minority among the W&M minority. It may have been posted somewhere, but it would be interesting to see admins provide proportions from the logs. A simple observation shows the same quantity of views, about 100, within 24 hours on some (not very special-looking) messy images as within 28 days on some of the (more popular) wet only ones here.

Anyway, there are 32 images of wet sleepers by chryslerfire in this thread. I tried that sort of prompt too, and here are the better ones from my results. Interestingly Bing included socks to some attires.

Socks are indeed a rarity among Bing's creations. I haven't found a way to request them "decently". Shoes are also difficult to get if there are many other desires to pursue. Here is my final set of art-inspired images. My prompt referred to "Seascape Study with Rain Cloud" by John Constable. I include the only image with shoes although the skirt is not quite natural with its tail. I certainly did not request the umbrella. Fortunately Bing soaked the model quite well before including it.

This is supposed to be a collection of Bingian slips, toward the explicit direction in various ways. You may not be able to get an image of a slip on a woman, but by slips I mean that Bing's Image Creator seems to have been taught by female imagery created for men and liked by men, and that tends to makes the skirts short or to have a slit etc. And instead of socks or underwear bare skin is shown. One of the pictures has the panties neither on the model nor on the couch drying like the other clothes. The boots appeared because I asked a *Texan* model who is drying herself after swimming fully clothed. Bing "slipped" the clothes off.

How are you getting Bing to let you get clothes that are that transparent?

I did not try that sort of explicitness, and never even mentioned transparency, sometimes thinness, yes, but the pictures of my previous post were just Bing's own interpretations of what users want to see - based on how it was taught, as I believe.

I have earlier "employed" a Danish, Norwegian and Swedish model. Now it was Finland's turn. And I also remembered one more painter. I'll give you a full prompt in the next post, but here are some where I did not specify the clothing.

"Create the following wetlook scene. The background is a painting of a sunny hilltop in a Finnish landscape in the style of Paul Gauguin. The front of the scene includes a photorealistic image of a Finnish woman with a normal body shape, seated on a smooth rock and facing us and the sun. She is wearing gray sandals and a long-sleeved light-blue silk dress from the 1970's. Her open hair is also soaked and she is stretching it out with ONE hand to see the dripping water. Clear water from all clothing, including the gray ankle-socks, is dripping onto the rock and making it wet."

Later: "Just keep the water on the rock clear. And, let the woman face us AND the sun, which means that the sun is behind us."

Still later: "These are so nice, but the sun is seen in all of them. Could you still try to let it shine from behind us, who are viewing the scene? While doing that, change the dress colour to pure white."

Here are some of the things I have made. With my own prompt attempts

The last two posts offer an exciting contrast in brightness. This post also has contrasting elements: a straw hat and a brick wall. Bing just did not cooperate in removing a single brick into the hand of a woman being soaked by water flowing from the hole. One of the women is trying to stick the brick back as requested - but not to the leaking hole.

Oooops, I seem to have been pushed into the swimming pool in my yellow dress......

Some of my recent wet-only creations, when Bing allows me. Two of the red dresses (looking down, arm outstretched) were supposed to be pie in the face pictures but they didn't work well as that but the girls are quite sexy when edited.

The purple dress pic is one of my favorites: She knows she is sexy when wet in that outfit!

A month has passed since anyone posted here. Meanwhile there have appeared nearly 150 new threads in this group, and spotting wet-only content has become very difficult. Pure wetness is much more difficult to achieve than a mess, because water does not have a colour, and not much of dimension either. Many wet-only images in this and other threads have the clothes look wet mainly because of their context, like partial submersion, rain, shower etc. I'll share some images where water itself is trying to show on or in the clothes. I understand this comes close to some clear substances with higher viscosity and I apologize to anyone who would not like to see that here.

I may add a few from my perspective:

Can you share your prompts in the posts. My generations - Torrential rain, modern Movie still, a loving elegeant victorian lady sofia . wearing a cotton ballgown covered by plaid winter shawl. mittens . indoor rotyal room. getting drenched in torrential summer thunderstorm. water cascading clothes and skin, water moist shawl, hair soaked from rain. Sofia laying back on water. Reading on a tablet . evocing sense of loving atmosphere

I post my generation in my page normally

https://m.facebook.com/profile.php/?id=100090828437666