|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"Another Use for AI"
Love you, too
No pictures because you never know where the anti-AI vigilantes are prowling, and technically, this may violate the rules here.
Like you can probably figure out from my postings, I'm turned on when WAM happens to women dressed elegantly wearing long gloves. I buy a lot of wetlook from several of the producers here but rarely see anything with long gloves. I asked one of them once if he could do some, and the result was short knit gloves, almost mittens.
I've used some of the AI generators to "read" a picture I like and add gloves to some of the photos I've purchased. It doesn't always work but often enough that I am happy.
Simularly, I had a picture set of a girl wearing a nice, tight, wet little black party dress and SNEAKERS. I used AI to change the shoes to high heels.
I'm not posting the pictures here and their for my own enjoyment.
Like you can probably figure out from my postings, I'm turned on when WAM happens to women dressed elegantly wearing long gloves. I buy a lot of wetlook from several of the producers here but rarely see anything with long gloves. I asked one of them once if he could do some, and the result was short knit gloves, almost mittens.
I've used some of the AI generators to "read" a picture I like and add gloves to some of the photos I've purchased. It doesn't always work but often enough that I am happy.
Simularly, I had a picture set of a girl wearing a nice, tight, wet little black party dress and SNEAKERS. I used AI to change the shoes to high heels.
I'm not posting the pictures here and their for my own enjoyment.
Google's Nano Banana is actually extremely good at making these sort of tweaks to existing images. I've been using Google AI studio for similar things and so far the results and impressive. Unfortunately, the AI model is quite stupid and you may have to start over multiple times if it misunderstands you request.
Mortar said: Google's Nano Banana is actually extremely good at making these sort of tweaks to existing images. I've been using Google AI studio for similar things and so far the results and impressive. Unfortunately, the AI model is quite stupid and you may have to start over multiple times if it misunderstands you request.
I found out, a couple of weeks ago, that images can be altered on Google's Nano Banana (that sounds like a Donkey Kong thing)
I had a remarkable time altering images of two ladies (let's call them... "Ocean" and "Rainey") Sadly, I cannot post said images of Ocean and Rainey, since both are celebrities, and celebrity A.I. images are not allowed on this site. Which is too bad, since I completely OBLITERATED Ocean and Rainey (especially the latter)
I will say that Nano Banana will sometimes cause the lady to smile, or laugh, or wink, when you never added those elements in the prompt. Those little touches can make the results better, to be honest.
But Nano Banana can also not figure out certain concepts in the prompt, so you have to lay it out word-for-word, letter-for-letter for the system to figure it out... but those are on rare occasions (for me, anyway)
I even wanna be me! -- Zoe
Saturation Hall, Langstonedale
Lord of the Pies
deadpool said: ...since both are celebrities, and celebrity A.I. images are not allowed on this site.
It's not just celebrities. No synthetic photorealistic images (whether done by AI, Photoshop, or juat a very skilled human artist) of any real people can be posted here unless the person posting has full consent and a signed model release from the real people involved. Makes no difference if they are Taylor Swift or some random girl from the local mall - it's fundamentally wrong to put real people into fetish situations that they did not consent to. It's also unnecessary, given the stunning range of entirely ficticious people that AI can now generate.
For further detail, the "Synthetic Content" section of the ToS is well worth a read:
https://umd.net/termsofservice/#deep_fakes
Saturation Hall - Forth! The Gungemaidens!
DungeonMasterOne said:
It's not just celebrities. No synthetic photorealistic images (whether done by AI, Photoshop, or juat a very skilled human artist) of any real people can be posted here unless the person posting has full consent and a signed model release from the real people involved. Makes no difference if they are Taylor Swift or some random girl from the local mall - it's fundamentally wrong to put real people into fetish situations that they did not consent to. It's also unnecessary, given the stunning range of entirely ficticious people that AI can now generate.
For further detail, the "Synthetic Content" section of the ToS is well worth a read:
https://umd.net/termsofservice/#deep_fakes
deadpool said: ...since both are celebrities, and celebrity A.I. images are not allowed on this site.
It's not just celebrities. No synthetic photorealistic images (whether done by AI, Photoshop, or juat a very skilled human artist) of any real people can be posted here unless the person posting has full consent and a signed model release from the real people involved. Makes no difference if they are Taylor Swift or some random girl from the local mall - it's fundamentally wrong to put real people into fetish situations that they did not consent to. It's also unnecessary, given the stunning range of entirely ficticious people that AI can now generate.
For further detail, the "Synthetic Content" section of the ToS is well worth a read:
https://umd.net/termsofservice/#deep_fakes
Yeah, I have been ficticiously generated by A.I. for years now.
deadpool said:
I found out, a couple of weeks ago, that images can be altered on Google's Nano Banana (that sounds like a Donkey Kong thing)
I had a remarkable time altering images of two ladies (let's call them... "Ocean" and "Rainey") Sadly, I cannot post said images of Ocean and Rainey, since both are celebrities, and celebrity A.I. images are not allowed on this site. Which is too bad, since I completely OBLITERATED Ocean and Rainey (especially the latter)
I will say that Nano Banana will sometimes cause the lady to smile, or laugh, or wink, when you never added those elements in the prompt. Those little touches can make the results better, to be honest.
But Nano Banana can also not figure out certain concepts in the prompt, so you have to lay it out word-for-word, letter-for-letter for the system to figure it out... but those are on rare occasions (for me, anyway)
Mortar said: Google's Nano Banana is actually extremely good at making these sort of tweaks to existing images. I've been using Google AI studio for similar things and so far the results and impressive. Unfortunately, the AI model is quite stupid and you may have to start over multiple times if it misunderstands you request.
I found out, a couple of weeks ago, that images can be altered on Google's Nano Banana (that sounds like a Donkey Kong thing)
I had a remarkable time altering images of two ladies (let's call them... "Ocean" and "Rainey") Sadly, I cannot post said images of Ocean and Rainey, since both are celebrities, and celebrity A.I. images are not allowed on this site. Which is too bad, since I completely OBLITERATED Ocean and Rainey (especially the latter)
I will say that Nano Banana will sometimes cause the lady to smile, or laugh, or wink, when you never added those elements in the prompt. Those little touches can make the results better, to be honest.
But Nano Banana can also not figure out certain concepts in the prompt, so you have to lay it out word-for-word, letter-for-letter for the system to figure it out... but those are on rare occasions (for me, anyway)
Wtf man, seriously, you have some of the most powerful tools available to you and decide that you want to violate an existing celebrity or some random girl from social media.
This is exactly the reason platforms are becoming more and more locked down and guardrails increasing.
Design & Code ©1998-2025 Loverbuns, LLC 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Epoch Billing Support Log In