superb, sophisticated SLOP.

Dressed inappropriately for the job. Building inspector at a muddy construction site on a rainy day.

It's mutagen! The game show host really should've known better than to buy that discount slime from a shady figure in a dark alley, and to ignore the "biohazard" label on the barrel.


So anyway, I adore the comic book style art in the Messygirl comics and tried for a few more pictures of their epic game show sliming and their shower off/makeout session afterwards, and it's surprising Bing allowed the more sensual images and even made suggestions. Todd even got a "Gunger" t-shirt in the one picture, and I never once referred to slime in the prompt as gunge. Clearly the two are linked in Bing's algorithms.

The first image is from "The Price of Admission," a spin-off of Kiwimayotte's "The Rose of Deceit" series. Rufus the security guard is Kiwimayotte's original character and was used in my story with permission. Here, early in the story he has received his comeuppance for boorish behavior at work and was mopped with filth, and now he's stuck guarding his post for the rest of his shift. Cheyenne (my OC) is shocked to see his condition, though she really shouldn't feel too bad for him, as the guy had it coming.

Future images for this story are proving more difficult. Either I'm wording it wrong or Bing has something against dunk tanks, even if the couple about to go in are fully clothed.

More Honey ...

These are as sweet as.... beautiful pictures, I have to say, I really appreciate your signature, it pretty much sums up how I feel about WAM - It's not WAM if the hair stays clean

Liked how these messy gameshow pictures turned out.

Some muddy ones...

Liked this one - the girl in black escaped the gunge but couldn't resist getting close enough that she was caught by the splatter.

And a little mess also

Everybody loves a party with a theme! Hope those costumes weren't rented though, might not be getting their deposits back...

Some wet ones

I'm a bit late getting in on this, but I'm amazed at how good some the pictures are. I'll post some of mine soon.

I've been dabbling with a few AI image generators, although I'm fashionably late to the party as usual. I almost gave up with Bing; I've had all the problems that are documented elsewhere on this post. Anyway I have managed to get a few decent pictures worth posting, so here goes:-

Third attempt:

Well at least they appear in the preview this time.

Sooo

Who's tempted to AI lie their exes? Or is it just me?



But for real though, it's crazy to think we're almost to the point of being able to "wam/splosh" anyone's images.

Any boss, any partner or stranger.

I also think about bring classic wam models like Fawn of WAMF, Ramona Flour, London Andrews or ant one else who's ever graced the forums.

I'm curious if anyone's given either topics any thoughts or if there was an existing thread where these themes were discussed

Guidelines for this forum: If you upload content that features the likeness of real person but has been generated or altered to depict them in a fantasy scenario, that person must be you, your model, or someone from whom you've gotten consent to use their likeness for this purpose. We will need to remove any content that we feel may be using a person's likeness without their consent.

Also in UK at least that's illegal to do.

Its also already possible...

It's illegal in the UK to make porn images like this, and immoral everywhere on Earth. It's against the terms of service for this site and shouldn't be discussed or encouraged.

The absolute first rule of all things sexual - informed consent is absolutely everything.

Creating AI images of fantasy people is fine.

Involving any real person or their likeness in a fetish scenario or situation, without therir full and prior informed consent, is wrong, morally repugnant, completely out of order - and in terms of trying to post any such images here, against UMD's Terms of Service.

This is probably an area of AI porn that's still to be defined, but eventually you'll probably be able to buy datasets of sex workers who have given their full consent to allow their images to be used for generating AI fetish material, which will come with a digital public key that people can post (probably a QR code) alongside any images or video to prove they have the rights to use and publish the person's image that way - i imagine there'll be different levels, with different costs - someone's probably going to charge way more to allow their image in hardcore scenes than just dressed up fully clothed for example, and more for "publication rights" than just "use in private but do not share" rights.

It's not easy working on these gameshows. You're just minding your own business, doing your job, when all of a sudden you're getting roped into testing the gunge tank

Have the bing filters become relaxed I notice people able to generate topless images?

Potentially- the images do seem a bit hornier than last week!

Yes! I got two by accident, with one happening just seconds before I updated this post. I just said that she's barefoot in jeans. I just presumed that she'd wear a shirt. Next thing I know, I see the end result, and she's topless.

The first image isn't exactly all that great, since... well, I'll post it this weekend, and you'll see.

TOTALLY depends on the day, time of day, server you might be signed into, luck, etc. I can be getting 4 topless images back every time I click "generate". I cap out on generations, log into a different account, and can't produce a single image with the same prompt. I can also be producing 4 topless images at a time, every time, then the clock hits 3am and I can't make anything anymore. For about a week I KNEW I could get great images between 9pm and 3am, as if Bing had a "night mode for adults" or something lol. Then it just went away. I have had some really good days since then, but they are few and far between. Today I can't seem to produce even fully clothed tame stuff.

If the mess covers the 'naughty bits' enough that the filter doesn't recognise them, they have always gone through the filter. I've had several 'topless' pics, 'hand-bras', and one bottomless pic from Bing - unfortunately these have other problems that stop me using them (six-fingered hands, two left feet etc).

The filter settings do seem to ebb and flow, and do also seem to vary each time I log in. There was a period around the beginning of May when the filters seemed noticeably more relaxed, I was getting four images every time, more big breasts, bikinis, tube tops. micro skirts - other people seemed to as well.

As kemistry brought up recently, Bing seems to have given us topless models, in a couple of results.

This wasn't the best of what I came up with, but I wanted to post it.

She's clearly topless, as you can see. She is "wearing" something, due to the prompt, but it looks like she isn't getting sprayed by it, but it spraying it.

I have better ones, where they are still topless. Thanks, Bing!

In tribute to Splat the Brat, I give you a very sloppy audience gunging!

Thanks for the tribute, love the picture

Sorry to get off the topic of gunge:

I tried to recreate a viral image of some years ago but couldn't quite get to what I was aiming for.

The flip side to my recent male-mess image (https://umd.net/groups/i/a-place-to-post-male-ai-wam#postid_1012965):

I made a lot of new ones today, and -- though I want to post this in the "spray it" thread -- I had to share it in this thread.

It's the look of shock, as she's about to get blasted. That moment just before impact. The amount is SO much; she's surprised as to how much there is!

I didn't add this look of surprise to the prompt; it just turned out that way.

I hope you like it.