It's a shame they keep referring to WAM at the start of the article as 'wet and messy sex'. But other than that it's fab!
JnC x
I agree but I think the sex related angle is what sells
As compromise I made sure to include mentions of the fun and silliness and that it may only be foreplay or not even that... just fun (think the JUST fun bit got chopped but the rest is there)
I think it was realy good, it's quite hard explaining to new partners what wam is and something I personally find quite hard to talk about outside of sites like this, anything that can bring more attention to wam is great imo
Great article Candy and fairly in-depth and genuine. A lot of journalists put their spin on things and articles often come out with a completely different spin on things. We've done a few over the years, not wam related, but shy away from them now because of the alternative spin.
FailingRegis said: 70% cross dressers?! That's gotta be just a British thing? Otherwise I'd be surprised it's not much more in evidence on the UMD.
You haven't noticed there are thousands of CD/TV on here?... some very occasional, some want a domme to 'force' them to do it, some who do it all the time
dougiezerts said: Nice article. And great photos of you messed up! You say your mum has actually tried it?
yeah - about 8 years ago after I told her what I did she said she wanted a go. I said fine but I want nothing to do with it, lol ... I gave her the email addy for miss t / sploshagirl and the splosh website and she did a couple of sessions there. She liked it but couldn't continue due to poor health
That's a fairly good article especially considering it's just intended to be read by people on the train in the morning or at lunchtime at work. Nice work, Candy!
This is really, really great - genuinely insightful and I think it presents WAM honestly and in as non-weird, fun and inclusive a way as possible. Round of applause!
I too was surprised at the 70% crossdressing figure. But when I think of the number of gay guys who prefer to wear a suit, football kit or wrestling singlet for wam sessions, it makes sense - that's our own version of crossdressing (dressing as the erotic target) I guess.
Also hadn't thought about the honey thing (not that I've ever used it) and impressed that 52% of readers would give it a go (it was the same stat when I clicked).
tatabanyan said: This is really, really great - genuinely insightful and I think it presents WAM honestly and in as non-weird, fun and inclusive a way as possible. Round of applause!
I too was surprised at the 70% crossdressing figure. But when I think of the number of gay guys who prefer to wear a suit, football kit or wrestling singlet for wam sessions, it makes sense - that's our own version of crossdressing (dressing as the erotic target) I guess.
it may be more correlated with those wammers who 1) will indulge in a paid session and 2) specifically a session with me
as it's well known to be something I like and I share a love of tights and tights filling with many CD's, so that figure could be (unintentionally) biased - but yeah of the wammers who visit me, that's a pretty accurate number for how many cross dress.
I'm really pleased with the article and yay for the survey with over 50% fancying a go
DungeonMasterOne said: Wow, fantastic article, damn well done that Candy!
Cool that you don't use honey too, Felicity persuaded me to drop if from our substance list a few years back for similar reasons.
Thank you
Oh nice! Really glad others are doing this too. There's really no point in us wammers using honey when subbing with syrup won't hurt us in any way (but it won't do the bees any good)
Love you, too
xx
VIP Coupons