|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"What feature is the most important to include in a female WAM video?"
Love you, too
I mean, of course the whole production is cumulative, and there are deal breakers too, but I voted for pies in the face. That's pretty foundational, although coverage from slime or chocolate or some other substance is fine. But it's got to be the face, not just the hair. And it has to obscure the face, so a mostly transparent English gunge won't substitute for me but a smooth MadLoversCosplay slime or a shiny chocolate Man and the Wife covering works fine.
Now, at some point, the pies need to be of a certain gooey or smooth consistency. I love being able to see the outline of the face beneath the pie, a la the best of Slapstickstuff (especially pre cakes but also now too) and PiedPinups. A model disappearing under pie is great as the scene progresses, but not immediately.
Not every second of the scene needs to be that way, but those are my hooks. If someone is doing a scene with exclusively super crumbly gritty crusts that basically disintegrate into powder when they hit, no thanks.
And of course, this is all contingent on my being interested in or attracted to the model. I've got turn offs like the rest of us. So in addition, the answer to "What feature is the most important to include in a female WAM video?" is also "the female."
And, lastly, the quality of the producer and shoot. I don't need the video to be Oscar worthy, but a certain baseline competence, or growth over time, is expected. And on the producer front, I don't want to feel skeevy while I watch the video. Yes it's fetish work, but I see some producers who create videos that are inoffensive PG who have a disquieting atmosphere or energy that makes me want to go shower immediately, and I see other videos that are extremely explicit that feel comfortable and not unsettling at all, so yeah, that matters too.
Tl;dr:
1a. Pies w/ facial coverage
1b. The right kind of pies
2. The right woman (or NOT the wrong woman)
3. The right atmosphere (or NOT the wrong atmosphere)
Now, at some point, the pies need to be of a certain gooey or smooth consistency. I love being able to see the outline of the face beneath the pie, a la the best of Slapstickstuff (especially pre cakes but also now too) and PiedPinups. A model disappearing under pie is great as the scene progresses, but not immediately.
Not every second of the scene needs to be that way, but those are my hooks. If someone is doing a scene with exclusively super crumbly gritty crusts that basically disintegrate into powder when they hit, no thanks.
And of course, this is all contingent on my being interested in or attracted to the model. I've got turn offs like the rest of us. So in addition, the answer to "What feature is the most important to include in a female WAM video?" is also "the female."
And, lastly, the quality of the producer and shoot. I don't need the video to be Oscar worthy, but a certain baseline competence, or growth over time, is expected. And on the producer front, I don't want to feel skeevy while I watch the video. Yes it's fetish work, but I see some producers who create videos that are inoffensive PG who have a disquieting atmosphere or energy that makes me want to go shower immediately, and I see other videos that are extremely explicit that feel comfortable and not unsettling at all, so yeah, that matters too.
Tl;dr:
1a. Pies w/ facial coverage
1b. The right kind of pies
2. The right woman (or NOT the wrong woman)
3. The right atmosphere (or NOT the wrong atmosphere)
For me I like to see the build up, from clean to pied to completely messed up. As such it is interesting to see the way that the vote has gone.
The model, substance and clothed are important too.
So for example Honeysuckle wearing a smart business suit covered in custard would tick all three
But another model wearing something else covered in say mud would be less up my alley.
I think the first pie in any scene is the best bit. The idea of walking up to someone dressed in smart or sexy clothing and sticking a pie in their face is something I definitely find exciting
The model, substance and clothed are important too.
So for example Honeysuckle wearing a smart business suit covered in custard would tick all three
But another model wearing something else covered in say mud would be less up my alley.
I think the first pie in any scene is the best bit. The idea of walking up to someone dressed in smart or sexy clothing and sticking a pie in their face is something I definitely find exciting
Mud & wellies. If you've got those two, you're onto a winner with me. Getting stuck and struggling to get free is a bonus.
Elegant clothes, especially expensive silk and satin blouses, and nice blazers, are my passion, especially when worn by very attractive ladies with beautiful makeup and hair, perfect lipstick, and hopefully wearing tons of perfume.
I love to witness how this "perfect, sensual overall experience" suffers from their clothes being slowly stained and ruined, or when the clothes are ripped or cut.
In all, my fetish is clearly focused on the clothes and the beauty of the wearer, not on the substance or the coverage. A little stubborn stain on the perfect blouse of an elegant lady gives me much more than full messy coverage of a girl wearing a simple cotton top.
So, unfortunately, my category does not exist in your poll.
I love to witness how this "perfect, sensual overall experience" suffers from their clothes being slowly stained and ruined, or when the clothes are ripped or cut.
In all, my fetish is clearly focused on the clothes and the beauty of the wearer, not on the substance or the coverage. A little stubborn stain on the perfect blouse of an elegant lady gives me much more than full messy coverage of a girl wearing a simple cotton top.
So, unfortunately, my category does not exist in your poll.
When the model genuinely enjoys herself.
That's not innuendo either. Get your mind out the gutter.
I mean having a natural smile and enthusiastically enjoying the fun and sensations of messy play.
The opposite is also true for me; if she doesn't look happy it's a real mood killer no matter how sexy or erotic the scene otherwise would be.
That's not innuendo either. Get your mind out the gutter.
I mean having a natural smile and enthusiastically enjoying the fun and sensations of messy play.
The opposite is also true for me; if she doesn't look happy it's a real mood killer no matter how sexy or erotic the scene otherwise would be.
I love ruining and messing up my luxury goods, delicate clothes, dresses, bags, heels or pantyhose, I don't care how big those Chanel, Dior, Wolford, Jimmy Choo, Roger Vivier heels, clothes and bags are expensive.for me, these expensive clothes are bought with my hard-working salary. I feel happy when I wear them. It reflects my personality and my values, but when they are not careful, being stained will make me very depressed, heartbroken and uncomfortable, because it means that my money says goodbye to me again. at the same time, I also feel that my personality has been insulted, so when I back my home after that, I must be messy them full.
I mean, I like the most real feeling, rather than pretending to be messy in the movie, and those clothes that look fake and expensive, because in that scene the actors will not resonate with those props.
I mean, I like the most real feeling, rather than pretending to be messy in the movie, and those clothes that look fake and expensive, because in that scene the actors will not resonate with those props.
Most of these, but the most important thing is actually that the person has a convincingly genuine reaction. They need to be either squirming in disgust or laughing their head off. Nothing is more of a turn off than just sitting there looking bored and disengaged with the messing.
I voted for 'completely covered in mess all over', but in my eyes, to have achieved that, it needs several of the other options to be included too -
- clothes filling (because a scene should always start clothed
)
- proper, full-on hair coverage (this shouldn't just be a covering, it needs deep shampooing
)
- full nudity (ideally achieved by involuntary loss of clothes, such as chance or (for example) sheer volume of mess causing the inevitable sliding of knickers, tights, etc )
And, 'completely covered' should mean just that. Not a thin covering of gunge; this is about features obscured!
Unsurprisingly, this is how most visits to the SploshNGo salon often end up
- clothes filling (because a scene should always start clothed
) - proper, full-on hair coverage (this shouldn't just be a covering, it needs deep shampooing
) - full nudity (ideally achieved by involuntary loss of clothes, such as chance or (for example) sheer volume of mess causing the inevitable sliding of knickers, tights, etc
) And, 'completely covered' should mean just that. Not a thin covering of gunge; this is about features obscured!
Unsurprisingly, this is how most visits to the SploshNGo salon often end up
Make a mess, create memories!
Saturation Hall, Langstonedale
Lord of the Pies
Thanks again to all those who've voted and/or replied, there's one day left on this poll for anyone who wants to get a last minute vote in.
I should probaby say, I deliberately avoided naming specific substances or specific outfit types, as I was more interested in "techniques" and "results" than specific personal favourites. Trying to get a broader handle on the outline shape of what people like, if that makes sense?
Meanwhile, to answer the posts made since I last posted:
No problem - I know tastes change with time and as someone who's been here since the start, I figured what I assume is "the default taste" may have moved on, hence this poll.
Interesting about prefering tit-for-tat to one gets completely messed then another. I'm with you on that, I prefer to see two or more people gradually reducing each other to messy ruin bit by bit and all together. Also from a practical POV, this far north, if one person gets totally messed and then has to mess someone else up from clean, that messy person is going to be wet and cold for an extended period, no matter how many heaters we have running. All doing each other together so they all get wet and messy at similar rates is definitely easier on the girls.
I do know from previous conversations that some people like "one stays clean" where one or more people are completely messed up by someone who stays clean and dry, which to me is do-able as long as the "stayed clean" girl then gets completely messed in a second scene, in exatly the same outfit. But my own taste is definitely tit-for-tat messings.
Fair points. We've been really lucky with Maude's legendary face-plants in her mud scenes, she originally did them entirely un-asked-for, and I know people really enjoy them. At the same time though, if someone is happy to get covered in mud but prefers to keep her face clean, I'm cool with that, especially if she's fine with hair coverage. We've a few scenes with Honeysuckle where she gives herself a full hair shampoo and gets utterly covered in mud except her face - I quite like the resulting look, clean face and clear features, while everything else is drenched in it.
I can remember when in any survey like this "Pies in the face" would be that absolute runaway winner by a country mile, so it's been interesting to see the difference here, and that "Total coverage" now outruns "Pies" as the No1 priority. But I do get that pies are still a massive part of it for a lot of people.
In this poll I guess I was kind of assuming "viewer like the models" was a given, it is a valid point though. And yeah, decent lighting and a model or models who at least look comfortable with what they are doing, and being on camera, is definitely a requirement.
Can't argue with that! And yes, the first messings are definitely the things that do it for me too, though in my case more "the first pour into a clean outfit" rather than a pie in the face. But for me the first moments of a pour inside someone's clothes, when you can see the gloop pouring in but nothing is actually showing through yet, is magical, as is the point where the stains and wetness first start to show through from the inside, and you just know how squelchy that must feel. 
LOL - we certainly have plenty of mud and wellies scenes!
I'm guessing you've seen our one of Maria in wellies and waterproof boilersuit getting totally stuck in the mudbanks? She actually got so stuck after jumping straight into a deep but that we stopped the cameras and asked if she wanted a hand out, but she said no, she was happy to struggle in the mud, so we resumed filming and struggle she did, ending up utterly drenched in mud in the process before she finally got free. https://saturationhall.umd.net/download_info/maria-gets-very-stuck
Interesting take on it, thanks for sharing. I do know the right outfit can make a scene, or the wrong one ruin it, personally I can't stand those short suit skirts that barely cover any of the legs when sitting down, I want a skirt to be at least knee-length so there's a decent amount of material to see getting messy.
But I'd not considered that a small mess on the right outfit would be preferred over a bigger mess on a less right outfit. Cool point.
With you completely on that. Model not enjoying == total mood killer for me too.
I'm guessing this will be more how someone feels who's wamming for themselves, as opposed to a produced video, as finding people willing to destroy their own high-end gear and accessories that acually cost serious money is going to be rare unless the person is totally into the fetish themselves, and is fairly wealthy and so can afford to use expensive outfits to wam in.
Must admit I've never really undersood doing wam with handbags, something that used to bug me in Allwam videos as the handbags would end up blocking the view of the girls' skirts or trousers getting messy. Might make that the subject of a future poll.
Yep, agree with that.
I definitly missed a trick when i didn't include "full head coverage" along with pies in the face, given how many people have mentioned this.
I've always thought hair messing should involve full shampooing, not just top coverage, for the same reasons you say. Our scenes don't usually involve nuduty, but with you on the rest.
I should probaby say, I deliberately avoided naming specific substances or specific outfit types, as I was more interested in "techniques" and "results" than specific personal favourites. Trying to get a broader handle on the outline shape of what people like, if that makes sense?
Meanwhile, to answer the posts made since I last posted:
messydreams said: Thanks for asking!
For me, multiple pretty girls (2-5) getting each other messy, including their clothes, face, body, ex.
But it's a huge turn off for me of its one girl gets fully messed, head to toe... then on to the next girl for the total messing, and then on to the next. I prefer tit for tat action, giving and receiving, the girls delivering the mess to each other and their reactions. They can all end up fully messed head to toe, clothes filled, panties filled... and then stripped naked. Just let it be interactive and not just one girl totally covered and then on to the next girl for hear complete messing, I personally don't find that realistic, entertaining or exciting.
I also appreciate a little build up at the start of the video, some story, some showing off, setting the stage for the mess, not just the mess starts right away the first seconds of the video.
Of course I know producing all of this is a lot of work and no easy task, so thanks to the producers who do it!
For me, multiple pretty girls (2-5) getting each other messy, including their clothes, face, body, ex.
But it's a huge turn off for me of its one girl gets fully messed, head to toe... then on to the next girl for the total messing, and then on to the next. I prefer tit for tat action, giving and receiving, the girls delivering the mess to each other and their reactions. They can all end up fully messed head to toe, clothes filled, panties filled... and then stripped naked. Just let it be interactive and not just one girl totally covered and then on to the next girl for hear complete messing, I personally don't find that realistic, entertaining or exciting.
I also appreciate a little build up at the start of the video, some story, some showing off, setting the stage for the mess, not just the mess starts right away the first seconds of the video.
Of course I know producing all of this is a lot of work and no easy task, so thanks to the producers who do it!
No problem - I know tastes change with time and as someone who's been here since the start, I figured what I assume is "the default taste" may have moved on, hence this poll.
Interesting about prefering tit-for-tat to one gets completely messed then another. I'm with you on that, I prefer to see two or more people gradually reducing each other to messy ruin bit by bit and all together. Also from a practical POV, this far north, if one person gets totally messed and then has to mess someone else up from clean, that messy person is going to be wet and cold for an extended period, no matter how many heaters we have running. All doing each other together so they all get wet and messy at similar rates is definitely easier on the girls.
I do know from previous conversations that some people like "one stays clean" where one or more people are completely messed up by someone who stays clean and dry, which to me is do-able as long as the "stayed clean" girl then gets completely messed in a second scene, in exatly the same outfit. But my own taste is definitely tit-for-tat messings.
chris_gee said: I also voted for full nudity, closely followed by total coverage, and being tied up. Of current releases, for pies/gunge, the Judge Jenny scenes tick pretty much every box. Nude, tied, and utterly obliterated.
For mud, The Mud Slave scene from Messygirl with Cadence Lux is top tier for me. Nude, tied, pushed in, face first, right from the start. I hope it becomes a series.
Nothing puts me off a scene, particularly a mud scene, quite like them still being dressed and still having clean faces at the end. It feels very 'half a job' to me, although I appreciate it will tick all the boxes for a lot of other people.
For mud, The Mud Slave scene from Messygirl with Cadence Lux is top tier for me. Nude, tied, pushed in, face first, right from the start. I hope it becomes a series.
Nothing puts me off a scene, particularly a mud scene, quite like them still being dressed and still having clean faces at the end. It feels very 'half a job' to me, although I appreciate it will tick all the boxes for a lot of other people.
Fair points. We've been really lucky with Maude's legendary face-plants in her mud scenes, she originally did them entirely un-asked-for, and I know people really enjoy them. At the same time though, if someone is happy to get covered in mud but prefers to keep her face clean, I'm cool with that, especially if she's fine with hair coverage. We've a few scenes with Honeysuckle where she gives herself a full hair shampoo and gets utterly covered in mud except her face - I quite like the resulting look, clean face and clear features, while everything else is drenched in it.
JazzTalker said: I mean, of course the whole production is cumulative, and there are deal breakers too, but I voted for pies in the face. That's pretty foundational, although coverage from slime or chocolate or some other substance is fine. But it's got to be the face, not just the hair. And it has to obscure the face, so a mostly transparent English gunge won't substitute for me but a smooth MadLoversCosplay slime or a shiny chocolate Man and the Wife covering works fine.
Now, at some point, the pies need to be of a certain gooey or smooth consistency. I love being able to see the outline of the face beneath the pie, a la the best of Slapstickstuff (especially pre cakes but also now too) and PiedPinups. A model disappearing under pie is great as the scene progresses, but not immediately.
Not every second of the scene needs to be that way, but those are my hooks. If someone is doing a scene with exclusively super crumbly gritty crusts that basically disintegrate into powder when they hit, no thanks.
And of course, this is all contingent on my being interested in or attracted to the model. I've got turn offs like the rest of us. So in addition, the answer to "What feature is the most important to include in a female WAM video?" is also "the female."
And, lastly, the quality of the producer and shoot. I don't need the video to be Oscar worthy, but a certain baseline competence, or growth over time, is expected. And on the producer front, I don't want to feel skeevy while I watch the video. Yes it's fetish work, but I see some producers who create videos that are inoffensive PG who have a disquieting atmosphere or energy that makes me want to go shower immediately, and I see other videos that are extremely explicit that feel comfortable and not unsettling at all, so yeah, that matters too.
Tl;dr:
1a. Pies w/ facial coverage
1b. The right kind of pies
2. The right woman (or NOT the wrong woman)
3. The right atmosphere (or NOT the wrong atmosphere)
Now, at some point, the pies need to be of a certain gooey or smooth consistency. I love being able to see the outline of the face beneath the pie, a la the best of Slapstickstuff (especially pre cakes but also now too) and PiedPinups. A model disappearing under pie is great as the scene progresses, but not immediately.
Not every second of the scene needs to be that way, but those are my hooks. If someone is doing a scene with exclusively super crumbly gritty crusts that basically disintegrate into powder when they hit, no thanks.
And of course, this is all contingent on my being interested in or attracted to the model. I've got turn offs like the rest of us. So in addition, the answer to "What feature is the most important to include in a female WAM video?" is also "the female."
And, lastly, the quality of the producer and shoot. I don't need the video to be Oscar worthy, but a certain baseline competence, or growth over time, is expected. And on the producer front, I don't want to feel skeevy while I watch the video. Yes it's fetish work, but I see some producers who create videos that are inoffensive PG who have a disquieting atmosphere or energy that makes me want to go shower immediately, and I see other videos that are extremely explicit that feel comfortable and not unsettling at all, so yeah, that matters too.
Tl;dr:
1a. Pies w/ facial coverage
1b. The right kind of pies
2. The right woman (or NOT the wrong woman)
3. The right atmosphere (or NOT the wrong atmosphere)
I can remember when in any survey like this "Pies in the face" would be that absolute runaway winner by a country mile, so it's been interesting to see the difference here, and that "Total coverage" now outruns "Pies" as the No1 priority. But I do get that pies are still a massive part of it for a lot of people.
In this poll I guess I was kind of assuming "viewer like the models" was a given, it is a valid point though. And yeah, decent lighting and a model or models who at least look comfortable with what they are doing, and being on camera, is definitely a requirement.
EnglishGent said: For me I like to see the build up, from clean to pied to completely messed up. As such it is interesting to see the way that the vote has gone.
The model, substance and clothed are important too.
So for example Honeysuckle wearing a smart business suit covered in custard would tick all three
But another model wearing something else covered in say mud would be less up my alley.
I think the first pie in any scene is the best bit. The idea of walking up to someone dressed in smart or sexy clothing and sticking a pie in their face is something I definitely find exciting
The model, substance and clothed are important too.
So for example Honeysuckle wearing a smart business suit covered in custard would tick all three
But another model wearing something else covered in say mud would be less up my alley.
I think the first pie in any scene is the best bit. The idea of walking up to someone dressed in smart or sexy clothing and sticking a pie in their face is something I definitely find exciting
Can't argue with that! And yes, the first messings are definitely the things that do it for me too, though in my case more "the first pour into a clean outfit" rather than a pie in the face. But for me the first moments of a pour inside someone's clothes, when you can see the gloop pouring in but nothing is actually showing through yet, is magical, as is the point where the stains and wetness first start to show through from the inside, and you just know how squelchy that must feel.
MuddySideUp said: Mud & wellies. If you've got those two, you're onto a winner with me. Getting stuck and struggling to get free is a bonus.
LOL - we certainly have plenty of mud and wellies scenes!
I'm guessing you've seen our one of Maria in wellies and waterproof boilersuit getting totally stuck in the mudbanks? She actually got so stuck after jumping straight into a deep but that we stopped the cameras and asked if she wanted a hand out, but she said no, she was happy to struggle in the mud, so we resumed filming and struggle she did, ending up utterly drenched in mud in the process before she finally got free. https://saturationhall.umd.net/download_info/maria-gets-very-stuck
1978wam said: Elegant clothes, especially expensive silk and satin blouses, and nice blazers, are my passion, especially when worn by very attractive ladies with beautiful makeup and hair, perfect lipstick, and hopefully wearing tons of perfume.
I love to witness how this "perfect, sensual overall experience" suffers from their clothes being slowly stained and ruined, or when the clothes are ripped or cut.
In all, my fetish is clearly focused on the clothes and the beauty of the wearer, not on the substance or the coverage. A little stubborn stain on the perfect blouse of an elegant lady gives me much more than full messy coverage of a girl wearing a simple cotton top.
So, unfortunately, my category does not exist in your poll.
I love to witness how this "perfect, sensual overall experience" suffers from their clothes being slowly stained and ruined, or when the clothes are ripped or cut.
In all, my fetish is clearly focused on the clothes and the beauty of the wearer, not on the substance or the coverage. A little stubborn stain on the perfect blouse of an elegant lady gives me much more than full messy coverage of a girl wearing a simple cotton top.
So, unfortunately, my category does not exist in your poll.
Interesting take on it, thanks for sharing.
I do know the right outfit can make a scene, or the wrong one ruin it, personally I can't stand those short suit skirts that barely cover any of the legs when sitting down, I want a skirt to be at least knee-length so there's a decent amount of material to see getting messy. But I'd not considered that a small mess on the right outfit would be preferred over a bigger mess on a less right outfit. Cool point.
screen_name said: When the model genuinely enjoys herself.
That's not innuendo either. Get your mind out the gutter.
I mean having a natural smile and enthusiastically enjoying the fun and sensations of messy play.
The opposite is also true for me; if she doesn't look happy it's a real mood killer no matter how sexy or erotic the scene otherwise would be.
That's not innuendo either. Get your mind out the gutter.
I mean having a natural smile and enthusiastically enjoying the fun and sensations of messy play.
The opposite is also true for me; if she doesn't look happy it's a real mood killer no matter how sexy or erotic the scene otherwise would be.
With you completely on that. Model not enjoying == total mood killer for me too.
Michele Choo said: I love ruining and messing up my luxury goods, delicate clothes, dresses, bags, heels or pantyhose, I don't care how big those Chanel, Dior, Wolford, Jimmy Choo, Roger Vivier heels, clothes and bags are expensive.for me, these expensive clothes are bought with my hard-working salary. I feel happy when I wear them. It reflects my personality and my values, but when they are not careful, being stained will make me very depressed, heartbroken and uncomfortable, because it means that my money says goodbye to me again. at the same time, I also feel that my personality has been insulted, so when I back my home after that, I must be messy them full.
I mean, I like the most real feeling, rather than pretending to be messy in the movie, and those clothes that look fake and expensive, because in that scene the actors will not resonate with those props.
I mean, I like the most real feeling, rather than pretending to be messy in the movie, and those clothes that look fake and expensive, because in that scene the actors will not resonate with those props.
I'm guessing this will be more how someone feels who's wamming for themselves, as opposed to a produced video, as finding people willing to destroy their own high-end gear and accessories that acually cost serious money is going to be rare unless the person is totally into the fetish themselves, and is fairly wealthy and so can afford to use expensive outfits to wam in.
Must admit I've never really undersood doing wam with handbags, something that used to bug me in Allwam videos as the handbags would end up blocking the view of the girls' skirts or trousers getting messy. Might make that the subject of a future poll.
kipperflew2 said: Most of these, but the most important thing is actually that the person has a convincingly genuine reaction. They need to be either squirming in disgust or laughing their head off. Nothing is more of a turn off than just sitting there looking bored and disengaged with the messing.
Yep, agree with that.
xey said: As always, the most important thing for me is to maintain full coverage from the shoulders up, a thick and cakey slightly dry cream is best, the facial contour is as unobtrusive as possible, and the surface is smooth, similar to the appearance of a plaster cast.
I definitly missed a trick when i didn't include "full head coverage" along with pies in the face, given how many people have mentioned this.
SploshAndGo said: I voted for 'completely covered in mess all over', but in my eyes, to have achieved that, it needs several of the other options to be included too -
- clothes filling (because a scene should always start clothed )
- proper, full-on hair coverage (this shouldn't just be a covering, it needs deep shampooing )
- full nudity (ideally achieved by involuntary loss of clothes, such as chance or (for example) sheer volume of mess causing the inevitable sliding of knickers, tights, etc )
And, 'completely covered' should mean just that. Not a thin covering of gunge; this is about features obscured!
Unsurprisingly, this is how most visits to the SploshNGo salon often end up
- clothes filling (because a scene should always start clothed
) - proper, full-on hair coverage (this shouldn't just be a covering, it needs deep shampooing
) - full nudity (ideally achieved by involuntary loss of clothes, such as chance or (for example) sheer volume of mess causing the inevitable sliding of knickers, tights, etc
) And, 'completely covered' should mean just that. Not a thin covering of gunge; this is about features obscured!
Unsurprisingly, this is how most visits to the SploshNGo salon often end up
I've always thought hair messing should involve full shampooing, not just top coverage, for the same reasons you say. Our scenes don't usually involve nuduty, but with you on the rest.
Saturation Hall - Forth! The Gungemaidens!
DungeonMasterOne said: I guess this fits with the "poured over heads" thing discussed further up. I've always seen it as "shampoo it in" as that means every strand of hair is coated in gloop, rather than just the outside being covered and the hair underneath staying clean. Point noted though.
DungeonMasterOne said: TBH the way so many other producers over the years have always poured mess over their models heads from the start has always slightly puzzled me, as once the face is covered you can't see their reactions - but I'd not realised it was a specific actual taste, as opposed to a "that's how they do it on TV so we do the same" kind of "just how it's done" thing. The reason we mess our people's clothes first and heads last is to keep the reactions visible, it hadn't occured to me that "do the head first" was an actual specific taste. Useful info, ta!
I get a lot of requests for this in my videos!!! You can def see my reactions afterwards!
I'm a hot mess ;)
11/22/24, 10:07am: [Admin] [quote] and [/quote] added round the quoted text for clarity.
Yes! And Bratty, I do love your reactions. HA! 
Other people touched on it, but the big thing for me is facial coverage. Pie in the face is the best way to do this, but a slime pour where the model looks up is fine.
The "looking up" is obviously kind of hard to work into a script, but ultimately I'm here to see the mess, the skit can help make it more entertaining. I can be perfectly content to watch a model who's looks I like just sitting there taking pies in the face and slimings, without much of a set up.
You said it was obvious, but I have to like the model too. I have a fairly narrow range of models I like, and they have to hit those makrs.
The "looking up" is obviously kind of hard to work into a script, but ultimately I'm here to see the mess, the skit can help make it more entertaining. I can be perfectly content to watch a model who's looks I like just sitting there taking pies in the face and slimings, without much of a set up.
You said it was obvious, but I have to like the model too. I have a fairly narrow range of models I like, and they have to hit those makrs.
For me its some or partial nudity, scenes that stay fully clothed don't do much for me but other than that I don't really have criteria because I love variety. I have a few select favorite produces/models because every scene they do is something totally different, you never know what they'll do next.
Topless and in a sexy thong nothing like messy tits and ass cheeks
Sponsors
Design & Code ©1998-2025 Loverbuns, LLC 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Epoch Billing Support Log In