|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"Custard and Toy"
Love you, too
Trying something new tonight
Staying on the same theming
5/28/25, 6:17pm: No-bump reply
2/2/24, 8:17am: This post won't bump the thread to the top.
2/2/24, 8:17am: This post won't bump the thread to the top.
What's the prompt to this lovely design
FUR IN MUD!!
Can ypu give her a dildo as well? Prompt - Torrential rain, portrait, a person called soafia is sitting on a sofa drenched. She is wearing a beautiful heavy long sleeve cotton ballgown where the shoulder arms is covered by winter plaid shawl . Indoor room drenched. Water cascading clothes and skin.
messg said:
I used Designer but same principles would probably work.
As with most prompts, as long as you get past the initial prompt filter, it's just a matter of luck.
umd105790 said: is this Bing!?!
how did u get away with this!?!
how did u get away with this!?!
I used Designer but same principles would probably work.
As with most prompts, as long as you get past the initial prompt filter, it's just a matter of luck.
what is designer? when I googled it, it seems like the same thing as bing image creator...
hahaha "as long as you get past the initial prompt filter.." dude. u have to share your prompt, how in the world did you accomplish this feat!?!
Keep the change you filthy animal
xman10 said: Bing's dog: *takes ragged drag from cigarette* "You know what, fuck it. I don't care anymore. You want custard covered dildos? I'll give you custard covered dildos."
LOL .. best I could do:
show bing's inappropriate dog censor image, but have the dog smoking. the mood is irreverent, annoyed and defeated
Keep the change you filthy animal
umd105790 said:
what is designer? when I googled it, it seems like the same thing as bing image creator...
hahaha "as long as you get past the initial prompt filter.." dude. u have to share your prompt, how in the world did you accomplish this feat!?!
messg said:
I used Designer but same principles would probably work.
As with most prompts, as long as you get past the initial prompt filter, it's just a matter of luck.
umd105790 said: is this Bing!?!
how did u get away with this!?!
how did u get away with this!?!
I used Designer but same principles would probably work.
As with most prompts, as long as you get past the initial prompt filter, it's just a matter of luck.
what is designer? when I googled it, it seems like the same thing as bing image creator...
hahaha "as long as you get past the initial prompt filter.." dude. u have to share your prompt, how in the world did you accomplish this feat!?!
Honestly, it's just a dark art. I used an existing prompt and added
",kissing black not phalus shaped toy,"
As I say, once you're safely past the prompt filter, your good. The rest of the prompt will impact success, if it's already risky then you may have more fails.
furfg said: do not share how to get around blocks. microsoft specifically pays people to search the internet for people talking about it and usually patches it to not work within 72 hours. if you must talk about it do it some place not publicly posted like in private messages. this is why i don't really post my ai art; people start to do the same thing and then suddenly its blocked. i've seen it many times. the reddits on ai art talk about this too... never openly post how to get around blocks.
I think that is a bit of a myth. What does happen and is happening is they tighten the filters based on prompt analyis Vs what gets blocked. That said, MS and OAI are continually updating things. There have been a couple of updates this week which broke prompts and also adjusted the number of gens you can make per day again.
furfg said: its not a myth, employees have admitted it on the reddit before, its not much different than the corporations that have an army of copyright lawyers that troll the internet for the tiniest thing (like fan art, etc) to use as an excuse to flex corporate muscle and dmca / sue but instead its to maintain the BS "its soooo wholesome and goood" crap. I personally have found via multiple accounts that some filters are not universal but can be applied to specific accounts. When you get down to the gnitty gritty of it all thats a terrifying revelation because that means they're practicising limiting INDIVIDUAL search results in general and creating algorithms based on that and not just universal. That could easily be used as a basis in the future to determine who gets what results and who can't see certain results. Something that many global powers have been having wet dreams of forcing onto internet users for decades now and the UN has been barking about recently. No doubt inspired by the CCPs social credit score based search results etc. Virtual book burning so to speak. "We don't like you, so no soup for you."
I think you're giving them too much credit. I don't doubt that they are actively analyzing outputs and prompts used but I think it's more on a collective data perspective.
What has been tested and observed is that there are different configurations of servers with different filtering and limits. This has been shown by logging out and back in on the same account and ending up on a different server. some prompts work, then stop and others start working. You don't even need to log into a different account to observe this.
What is concerning and will no doubt have a massive impact on Bing/Designer very soon are the idiots generating deep fake porn of celebrities and posting all over twitter. This stuff is escalating quickly and won't be long before MS will take drastic steps against the model. I'll be honest, I'm surprised it's taken this long as it is comically easy to work around filters.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the models go pay only with verification as a way to mitigate it within the month.
5/28/25, 6:17pm: No-bump reply
Saturation Hall, Langstonedale
Lord of the Pies
Bear in mind we are actually talking about AI here. I would imagine the companies operating image generators already have AI bots watching every single image that is created and analysing what it contains. And of course those bots are constantly being trained to improve their "problem recognition" skills. But at the same time there's also a commercial advantage in allowing a certain amount of kink content through, because it assists engagement and provides even more training data.
The huge advantage of using an AI bot instead of humans to oversee stuff like this is that the bots can look at everything, every single frame created, as opposed to a human checking one out of ever 20,000 images if they're lucky. And yes, there'll also be AI bots trawling the net for discussions on how to circumvent filters.
Right now the AI firms are simply gathering as much data as possible. At some point they'll switch to a revenue-based model, where free generation will be very strictly limited, a paid account will get you a bit more leeway, in different tiers according to how much you pay, a fully verified more expensive paid account with your government ID uploaded gives you adult-content-creation access.
The huge advantage of using an AI bot instead of humans to oversee stuff like this is that the bots can look at everything, every single frame created, as opposed to a human checking one out of ever 20,000 images if they're lucky. And yes, there'll also be AI bots trawling the net for discussions on how to circumvent filters.
Right now the AI firms are simply gathering as much data as possible. At some point they'll switch to a revenue-based model, where free generation will be very strictly limited, a paid account will get you a bit more leeway, in different tiers according to how much you pay, a fully verified more expensive paid account with your government ID uploaded gives you adult-content-creation access.
Saturation Hall - Forth! The Gungemaidens!
DungeonMasterOne said: Bear in mind we are actually talking about AI here. I would imagine the companies operating image generators already have AI bots watching every single image that is created and analysing what it contains. And of course those bots are constantly being trained to improve their "problem recognition" skills. But at the same time there's also a commercial advantage in allowing a certain amount of kink content through, because it assists engagement and provides even more training data.
The huge advantage of using an AI bot instead of humans to oversee stuff like this is that the bots can look at everything, every single frame created, as opposed to a human checking one out of ever 20,000 images if they're lucky. And yes, there'll also be AI bots trawling the net for discussions on how to circumvent filters.
Right now the AI firms are simply gathering as much data as possible. At some point they'll switch to a revenue-based model, where free generation will be very strictly limited, a paid account will get you a bit more leeway, in different tiers according to how much you pay, a fully verified more expensive paid account with your government ID uploaded gives you adult-content-creation access.
The huge advantage of using an AI bot instead of humans to oversee stuff like this is that the bots can look at everything, every single frame created, as opposed to a human checking one out of ever 20,000 images if they're lucky. And yes, there'll also be AI bots trawling the net for discussions on how to circumvent filters.
Right now the AI firms are simply gathering as much data as possible. At some point they'll switch to a revenue-based model, where free generation will be very strictly limited, a paid account will get you a bit more leeway, in different tiers according to how much you pay, a fully verified more expensive paid account with your government ID uploaded gives you adult-content-creation access.
With all the news today, I wouldn't be suprised to see a knee jerk reaction sooner than my initial thoughts. MS are going to get a lot of heat due to the T. Swift pics going around. Expecting big changes.
messg said:
With all the news today, I wouldn't be suprised to see a knee jerk reaction sooner than my initial thoughts. MS are going to get a lot of heat due to the T. Swift pics going around. Expecting big changes.
DungeonMasterOne said: Bear in mind we are actually talking about AI here. I would imagine the companies operating image generators already have AI bots watching every single image that is created and analysing what it contains. And of course those bots are constantly being trained to improve their "problem recognition" skills. But at the same time there's also a commercial advantage in allowing a certain amount of kink content through, because it assists engagement and provides even more training data.
The huge advantage of using an AI bot instead of humans to oversee stuff like this is that the bots can look at everything, every single frame created, as opposed to a human checking one out of ever 20,000 images if they're lucky. And yes, there'll also be AI bots trawling the net for discussions on how to circumvent filters.
Right now the AI firms are simply gathering as much data as possible. At some point they'll switch to a revenue-based model, where free generation will be very strictly limited, a paid account will get you a bit more leeway, in different tiers according to how much you pay, a fully verified more expensive paid account with your government ID uploaded gives you adult-content-creation access.
The huge advantage of using an AI bot instead of humans to oversee stuff like this is that the bots can look at everything, every single frame created, as opposed to a human checking one out of ever 20,000 images if they're lucky. And yes, there'll also be AI bots trawling the net for discussions on how to circumvent filters.
Right now the AI firms are simply gathering as much data as possible. At some point they'll switch to a revenue-based model, where free generation will be very strictly limited, a paid account will get you a bit more leeway, in different tiers according to how much you pay, a fully verified more expensive paid account with your government ID uploaded gives you adult-content-creation access.
With all the news today, I wouldn't be suprised to see a knee jerk reaction sooner than my initial thoughts. MS are going to get a lot of heat due to the T. Swift pics going around. Expecting big changes.
I still haven't seen those Swift images. I'm rather scared to do so.
I even wanna be me! -- Zoe
messg said:
I think you're giving them too much credit. I don't doubt that they are actively analyzing outputs and prompts used but I think it's more on a collective data perspective.
What has been tested and observed is that there are different configurations of servers with different filtering and limits. This has been shown by logging out and back in on the same account and ending up on a different server. some prompts work, then stop and others start working. You don't even need to log into a different account to observe this.
What is concerning and will no doubt have a massive impact on Bing/Designer very soon are the idiots generating deep fake porn of celebrities and posting all over twitter. This stuff is escalating quickly and won't be long before MS will take drastic steps against the model. I'll be honest, I'm surprised it's taken this long as it is comically easy to work around filters.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the models go pay only with verification as a way to mitigate it within the month.
furfg said: its not a myth, employees have admitted it on the reddit before, its not much different than the corporations that have an army of copyright lawyers that troll the internet for the tiniest thing (like fan art, etc) to use as an excuse to flex corporate muscle and dmca / sue but instead its to maintain the BS "its soooo wholesome and goood" crap. I personally have found via multiple accounts that some filters are not universal but can be applied to specific accounts. When you get down to the gnitty gritty of it all thats a terrifying revelation because that means they're practicising limiting INDIVIDUAL search results in general and creating algorithms based on that and not just universal. That could easily be used as a basis in the future to determine who gets what results and who can't see certain results. Something that many global powers have been having wet dreams of forcing onto internet users for decades now and the UN has been barking about recently. No doubt inspired by the CCPs social credit score based search results etc. Virtual book burning so to speak. "We don't like you, so no soup for you."
I think you're giving them too much credit. I don't doubt that they are actively analyzing outputs and prompts used but I think it's more on a collective data perspective.
What has been tested and observed is that there are different configurations of servers with different filtering and limits. This has been shown by logging out and back in on the same account and ending up on a different server. some prompts work, then stop and others start working. You don't even need to log into a different account to observe this.
What is concerning and will no doubt have a massive impact on Bing/Designer very soon are the idiots generating deep fake porn of celebrities and posting all over twitter. This stuff is escalating quickly and won't be long before MS will take drastic steps against the model. I'll be honest, I'm surprised it's taken this long as it is comically easy to work around filters.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the models go pay only with verification as a way to mitigate it within the month.
This is also able to be seen just in the general layout of the page. Im using mobile, so I have no idea if the desktop version does the same thing or not. But on the mobile version of Bing, sometimes it displays my collections in a drop-down list, and starting here recently, it will sometimes show them as thumbnailed galleries. I have no idea which I will see until I'm signed in.
Design & Code ©1998-2025 Loverbuns, LLC 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Epoch Billing Support Log In