| exact phrase | has reviews | has ratings | has comments |
| has trailer | name your price | bundles only | high frame rate |
|
added within: days |
max price: $ |
min length: minutes |
"Loved watching a wam legend and her protege in messy fun!" I'm a bit prejudiced because I've been following Sammy-Jane for a couple of decades (we're about the same age), and she began appearing in videos almost exactly the same time as I began exploring my own interest in this fetish, so I almost feel like we're sisters! Her spirit, personality, playful attitude has always been a major attraction for me. And it's great fun seeing her interacting with the "next generation" of wam actresses like Eden, who I think also matches Sammy-Jane's spirit and personality. To me, this was a great value, great fun and a joyous return of Sammy-Jane to the genre! 10/13/10 | |
"Fantastic video! Very sexy & slippery." Absolutely loved this video. So awesomely slippery with tons of uncontrollable sliding & plenty of gunge coated curves. MrSensual 9/4/10Very sexy indeed! If you offered gunge sessions on the bouncy castle, I'd be there! | |
"Nice creamy, chocolaty, slippery video." Both very gorgeous girls. You gotta get the black girl back for more shoots though, she's got a body that deserves a big pool of slime or pudding, would be incredible! MrSensual 9/4/10Very nice video for cream & chocolate lovers. Again shame about the lack of natural sound. | |
"Amazing model, wonderful clay, but poor second angle." I have been a fan of the image set based off this video since way back in the MPV Stuff FTP days. Seeing that the video was now in a download store, I had to go for it. Alli_MI 9/3/10The clay is super thick and ultra smooth, no lumps or globs like some thick clays. It seems to stick to Brandi like a huge gown covering the whole pit, like its all one piece reacting together. Brandi's movements are slow and seductive, every move is for a reason. The video switches between two angles, sometimes a bit too frequently, but not enough to be annoying. The first angle is excellent quality, be it for today or 2000 when this video was first shot. The second angle, unfortunately, is lower quality video, rather grainy and with poor white balance. I almost question if it would be better to have the whole movie from a single angle, rather than having the low quality angle interspersed. Background music is very tolerable, nothing too annoying. When Brandi moans and slops the clay about you can easily hear. I don't know that any flies were present, as they commonly are at outdoor mud pit scenes, but the music did a good job at covering their annoying buzzes if they were. | |
"Decent, but no masturbation (as claimed)." Olivia is lovely, the clay is quite thick, and the coverage is near 100% (only her back remains by the end). I was a little disappointed that her top never came off, but whatever. I was very disappointed though, when the movie ended and there had not yet been masturbating. The synopsis says "she masturbates," however the video only shows her rub herself for two 5 second periods, outside the panties. Alli_MI 9/3/10If you are looking for a video of a girl in thick clay in a bikini, this may well be for you. If you want to see masturbation, move along and save your $5. | |
"Awesome mess, beautiful model..." Awesome mess, beautiful model! MrSensual 8/30/10Again, lack of overall natural sound was a real shame. The small snippet at the end where she describes the feeling of the slime is testament to how these otherwise gold standard clips could benefit from having more ambient sound. | |
"Nice visuals!" Really enjoyed watching this scene. Two great models & a nice pool of mess. MrSensual 8/30/10The only thing which really let it down, for me, was the lack of natural sound. Not being able to hear the girls enjoy themselves as well as the sound of the mess (even if it is interrupted by the producers directions) really stops me from fully indulging in a scene. | |
"Well made and well acted, but more about humiliation than WAM" This is a very well-produced video: good lighting and sound, an attractive setting, a gorgeous model, and if you're into models wearing only garter belt/stockings/heels for WAM--that's exactly what you get. For the money you'll spend, you get quality. A couple of important points--not criticisms, but issues relating to taste: * What you read in the description is exactly what happens in the video. If you're looking for multiple pies in the face, you may want to look elsewhere. When Candle finally gets pied in the face it's pretty awesome, but a definite case of quality over quantity. * The body hits are played more for humiliation than spectacle. If you like colorful pie hits that turn the model into a fascinating edible Jackson Pollock-style spectacle with each new, expansive splatter, again, perhaps you don't want to make this your first choice. The pies are mostly monochromatic and the hits, while impressively hard, are not vivid. * If you don't like it when a model seems to be legitimately upset or distressed about getting messy -- even if it's only because she's an above-average actor -- you may not enjoy this. Again, none of this is intended as a criticism of the video - just some additional info to help future buyers decide if it's for them. I'm glad I own it, but it doesn't satisfy my particular tastes as well as I'd hoped. | |
"Horny male WAM!" Awesome cake sitting vid! Must have been horny to make and is just as horny to watch! Fantastic job! Gungedpants 7/23/10Gotta try this myself! | |
"Great male WAM!" Great messy male video with a good choice of substances! Gungedpants 7/17/10I hope we get to see more from sewersyd! Maybe with you standing up :) | |
"I want my money back." Ah 'tis a shame! This video over about 10 years old and time has not been kind to the VHS source tape. Blurry, skips and distortions, no close-up shot until the end where the tape quality is poorest. Its a shame because Christy North was hot and the location great. But unwatchable now. I want my money back. ostrich67 5/6/10 | |
"Love her!" | |
"Poor quality video, but cheap and good content" Low resolution, no audio (music only), very very short clips. Still, I can't complain when I only spent $1 and got some great shaving cream clips. :) | |
