I have some pics I LOVE that I would loooove to see if someone could AI mess onto them! Let's see who can impress me with this new stuff!

Think I prefer the original model in all honesty x

Tbf there was another couple of pics I preferred but admin wouldn't let me post them because they contained rude AI lady bits

To clarify, the rules for realistic AI are the same as for real images, it it was apparent the model was naked when the image was created (even if we can't see actual bits), you have to have a verified account to post them.

Note this isn't any attempt to prevent nudity - everything up to full hardcore XXX is allowed here - but rather to ensure that before anyone can post explicit images, the site-owner knows who the poster is. This is required by the billing companies and is to protect against revenge porn and similar abuses.

Jayce I was really hoping that you would ask for this

Here are 2 variants that were easy to make and turned out ok. I might try and make better ones later today.

(I want to remind everyone that you need consent from a person to user their photo to photoshop it with synthetic content or produce images of their likeliness. Also please remember to tag it as synthetic.)

Thanks for the explanation, interesting point about the revenge porn that had never occurred to me until now

I hope you didn't perceive my rude ai lady bits comment as anything other than a bit of light hearted tongue in cheek flippancy from me

Anyway keep up the great work on this site

That's what most of the "Mastercard Restrictions" are about, they were brought in after certain large Tube sites flatly refused to do anything about anonymous users repeatedly uploading utterly abhorrent and illegal content. Requiring uploaders to be identified before they can upload adult content makes it much less likely that they'll upload things they don't have permission for.


Not at all, just appreciated the opportunity to clarify things.

Hi, Jayce: I've watching the evolution of AI. So far it is hit and miss when it comes to marrying something onto an existing photograph. Mostly miss.

Photoshopping is still better.

Would you like me to give PS a shot?

Jason

Pretty good for AI!

Can't speak on behalf of Jayce, but I wouldn't mind seeing what you can come up with

Here is a sequence I made of random colors and substances that I felt like applying

Laying on the furry rug must be nice, but not as nice as laying in some mud

Well Jayce, you looked sad in this one like you needed a hug. So I took you, made a mud golem clone of you, and made her give you a hug.

Sorry Jayce but nothing beats the real thing. The whole AI thing just depresses me. It's just not the same as seeing a model actually getting messy. AI should be banned on here otherwise people will end up purchasing content made by a computer rather than a model producing content.

This is likely the best use of AI at the moment, using a real photo as an outline for a generated image.

I completely agree.

The AI pictures I've seen on here have left me cold: they do nothing for me as far as wam enjoyment is concerned. I was mightily depressed the other day to look at the picture gallery and see almost the whole of the first page taken up by AI pics.

Part of the enjoyment of seeing wam pics is in acknowledging that someone *did* get messed, and the emotions that generates: the viewer's appreciation of seeing the mess (its quantity, extent, nature, etc) and also appreciating the model's efforts/willingness/humiliation/reactions (as appropriate) in being messed.

None of that is present in AI pics. Moreover, they're simply not very good.

There, I said it.

I genuinely feel rather unsettled by most of the AI pics I've seen on here. They're not real, they fail to please, and they're no match for the real thing.

I would very much like for them NOT to appear in the picture feed, or at least be given the option to exclude them (I see MM has now added a 'synthetic content' tick box to forum posts, which is a GREAT move - thanks MM!). EDIT: I've just noticed that a 'reduce synthetic' filter now features on the pic page too; EXCELLENT!!!

It's depressing to have to wade through dozens of sub-standard artificial images to reach genuine examples of the wam that has kept this community going for the last 25 years.

Regarding AI wam art and its place compared to real model produced content, it's definitely no substitute to the real deal and I don't think will ever pose a threat to the many beautiful models and talented producers who have been providing us with content for years

That said AI art is a means of people expressing their fantasies and can produce some often interesting and erotic images

Maybe we're looking at things the wrong way round in this thread. We have a very beautiful and sexy woman providing some great erotic pictures, do we need to tamper with them and do we expect to improve on the original content?

What I would love to see in an ideal world is some of these stunning models, such as Jayce, recreating some of the best AI produced scenes, I'm sure that would definitely serve the purpose of improving the original images x

I agree that real content is and always will be better. I can understand how it is depressing. I have the same feeling towards seeing someone suffer from certain savory, dogfood, or HGD scenes. I do not express my disinterest on the forum posts sharing that content though. (I am just using this as an example. There is nothing wrong with these scenes. I have nothing against it. I just don't enjoy it.)

I can understand why some may feel strong enough about this to make replies to discourage people from participating and sharing any of their ideas and creations. I can understand that some people may even want to discuss banning it here. I have even stated on this forum that banning AI content is a suitable option because of all of the ethical issues it brings - including the issue of the disappointment. A person may see a realistic AI altered image of Jayce out of context, and it would be utterly disappointing to realize that there is no video for it because it is not real. I occasionally see comments in AI images asking where is the video.

Jayce said she would love to see these. It would be different if it post from her like "Look at these AI images I had commissioned" or if it was a post from me like "Look at these AI images Jayce consented me to make". In those, it would be offering images a substitute for real wam. This thread is no different from other threads from Jayce where she ask for ideas. Instead of sharing ideas with words, we are sharing them with images. The images I share are not meant to replace Jayce nor are they meant to replace real wam. They are just thoughts from my brain, ideas I want to share, and technology I want to demonstrate. I really hope that AI is used to inspire real wam and not replace it.

i do believe that ai is giving people a disrupted fantasy because in reality? Even the biggest producers couldnt do what ai portrays.

but? I dont see any harm in doing some ai on my pics! I am intrigued to see who can make it look the most realistic!

keep them coming! that is very cool and you have my consent to use it here on the umd only for sharing purposes with my name on it I love the mud ones!

they all look great!