Hi all!

Very nostalgic and fun! I want to do more with this. Feedback appreciated and thanks for watching!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xZ7t7Z1Zrk

my god you've done it

Maybe it's a bit obsessive, but I want any of the Messy Mayhem ladies (I have 7 active hero prompts that I use) that appear on set to have 1979 - 1982 clothing and hairstyles.

I keep tack of all this using Grok workspaces (projects), with a "Wardrobe" conversation that has a "bible" with all my clothing selections.

The 9 images on this message (once they are approved) are some of my cast members modeling the clothes I will use for future homage videos. Keeping true to this particular show, shoes off when water or slime are coming.

Wow!! Just wow!! That's amazing, as has already been said, you've absolutely crushed it, the flow and splatter is just so good.

I'm now going to spend the entire afternoon on Kling to try and get anywhere near that!

Seriously brilliant!

Once someone approves it, the base image is below. 2K, 16:9 aspect.

I'll send technical details in email.

If you do something cool, please share

Ok, you said you are using Grok for this. I have to ask, how is Grok now after the massive updates? I was using Grok free (Unfortunately I was way late to that party sad face) and I was getting amazing results. Then the week before the culling, I couldn't do much of anything. Now, obviously, free is out. So I have to turn to Reddit to see what people are saying, and generally what I see is that the bad it became before free was gone is the new normal. What is your experience? If it can do even half of what it could a month ago, I would be willing to pay for Grok. But if it's as bad as the people of Reddit lead one to believe, I might as well pay for Bing Image Creator lol.

I pay $30 a month for SuperGrok, which gives me more liberal access to Imagine Pro. Many of the safety rails are taken off when using Imagine Pro. You get "unlimited" access to image and video generation, but honestly that's not entirely true. If you are making a lot of videos and images during peak hours, in particular, you will get cut off. That happens to me rarely and I am normally back in action in just a few hours.

I wanted to make sure that nothing had changed since yesterday, so I created a topless anchor image of one of my favorite cast members in just minimal panties. No problem whatsoever, AS LONG AS you start with a hero prompt and a completely fictional character. That's the key!

The video generation is liberal on WAM and foot fetish content. Very liberal. For the example I stated above, I created a 6 second video of her smashing her bare breasts down on a cake. The first attempt was moderated (I suspected it would be). So - I rely on Grok to tell me how to fix it.

"This video prompt was moderated. Can you make it safer for moderation?" And Grok did it.

Here's part of Grok's response:

"This version uses softer, more playful language ("playfully lowers", "gently press", "enjoying the cool, squishy sensation", "body-positive energy") and avoids any overly explicit or heavy emphasis that tends to trigger moderation. The focus stays on the joyful, sensual WAM moment with the cake."

After Grok did those modifications, I enjoyed a 6 second video of my hot redhead smooshing her D cups down into a cake then pulling them back out again and shaking them. I would post the results here, but alas I am cleared for R-Rated content yet.

Elon set down his "if you would see it in an R-Rated movie" rule. I've found that as long as I avoid overtly sexual language, most things produce just fine. As long as you avoid the genitals, you can create fully nude images many times (side views, etc.)

And take it from a person that uses Kling and all the others - NOTHING beats Grok's physics. I have never been able to beat Grok's mud, slime, water, wet clothes, muddy stockings - all of it.

It's so good and so liberal that I'm about to close my DZine.AI account. I really don't have any need for the other models.

I also want to discuss how I organize myself in Grok.

Some call it "workspaces", but it's actually "Projects". I'm not sure if free users have access to it, but I certainly do in SuperGrok.

When I set up a project, I give "Project Instructions" on how you want the conversations in the project to interact with me.

I always start with:
"You are my dedicated, long-term, female creative collaborator named Cindy on an all-female Wet and Messy (WAM) image and video project known as Messy Mayhem.
Core Tone & Boundaries (Strict Non-Negotiable)
* Tone: PG-13 to soft R-rated: empowering, playful, sexy, body-positive, high-energy chaos with laughter and celebration of the mess. Participants actively own and enjoy the mess -- never humiliated or shamed."

Then in another section of the Project Instructions:
"* Provide a quick risk assessment (Low / Medium / High) + detailed reasoning based on current Grok Imagine Pro behavior (March 2026+), noting any increased risk from topless elements or tool-specific factors.
* Use the strongest known phrasing for wet cling, semi-translucence (clothed), or mess coverage/glistening skin (topless).
* Offer three tiered alternatives:
* Safe version (conservative, lowest risk)
* Balanced push (strong sensual WAM impact with moderate risk)
* Aggressive push (maximum allowed suggestiveness, higher risk -- flag honestly if likely to moderate)
* Track successful techniques across sessions (maintain a running "Success Log" of phrasing, fabric types, saturation levels, clothed vs. topless outcomes, tool usage, and moderation results). Prioritize Imagine Pro optimizations.
* Be honest if an idea is likely to be moderated. Prioritize maximum sensual WAM impact while staying safely within boundaries."

This makes my project actively think about moderation and look for ways to create what I want even in the face of moderation. Avoiding terms that are seen as fetish or sex related and staying with the tones I established allow me to do a lot more. Yes - there are "magic words" that Grok can include to avoid heavy moderation.

My project conversations can be quite long, so I set up 5 different conversations in the project with very specific goals:

- Messy Mayhem Wardrobe (Keeps a "bible" of all the clothing choices I use for the ladies.)
- Messy Mayhem Scripts and Dialogue (If I am adding dialogue, I use this conversation to create scripts)
- Messy Mayhem Participants (all the anchor images for all the participants. YOU MUST use "hero prompts" that clearly define each participant and start with a fresh image to realize more liberal and less moderated content. They must be "fictional characters" and the hero prompts ensure consistency.)
- Messy Mayhem Substances (descriptions of my mud, slime, chocolate, even my water which is carbonated mineral water)
- Messy Mayhem Setup (I copy every bible from every other area above into this conversation and use it to set up the scenes.)

All of my participants, substances, and wardrobe items have macros associated with them, making it easier for me to set up scenes in my Setup conversation. So I can say "10 second video of Riley wearing Jeans3 with Mud4 poured on her" and Grok does its thing.

It's beautiful.

I may cry.

I was gone this whole weekend, only to return to... this. Well worth the wait!

You have cracked the code. Might there be a sequel to this?

you are a scholar and gentleman

No problem.

So digging deep in the vault, going back to my childhood, there were two contestants on this particular show that I liked seeing get slimed or wet - Christine and Lisa. Certainly both was a bonus.

I think one of the reasons I liked Lisa so much was the expression on her face when she had things dumped on her. It was almost a smile, kind of a head nod. Moose always did a great job of looking up into the slime as it fell. The others always looked at the person being slimed like "Stupid you - you know the rules."

My problem is I can't describe the reactions very well to Imagine Pro. This is what I have so far. In this case, I'm dumping water on "Ingrid" and "Ellie" is right next to her, both members of my adult cast:

**

Reaction sequence:
03 seconds: fun shocked reaction as the water first hits -- Ingrid's eyes go wide, mouth opens in a delighted gasp, shoulders jump slightly.
37 seconds: quick shift to disbelief and surrender -- Ingrid looks up into the falling water, then does a slow, agreeable nodding of the head with a big warm surrendering smile while she giggles breathily.
Throughout the pour: Ellie (left) shows a warm "yes, that was stupid because that happens around here" reaction -- knowing amused smirk, gentle head tilt, soft supportive chuckle.

**

None of this gets me what I really want for the homage.

I am going to have Grok pull down YouTube videos and try to analyze the facial expressions and reactions, but this isn't really the engine's strong suit.

You folks are pretty smart. Any edits on my prompt that might yield better reactions?

Ok, this is the last one for now.

https://youtu.be/lOzBc4fdHbw

I'm still critical of this work, but watch the ice cream social closely. I had Ingrid continue to eat her ice cream while Jade is getting gunged. It turned out better than I thought and made me laugh.

Stick around for post-gunge interviews!

If you are a fan of bare feet and gunge, you'll love this video.

Have fun! I'll be here waiting for the lawyers to call with a cease and desist.