Just wondering..is it the fact that the model is wearing tights (aka pantyhose I believe) that makes it sexy, knowing that even if she is just being gunged, some drops of gunge will end up on them, or does there need to be actual tights filling, which I know is a thing.
I remember talking with a watch-wam lover who explained to me that the watch didn't need to be an actual target for a messy substance..as long as the girl who was getting trashed wore a watch.
I wondered if it was the same with tights. Speaking as a non-tights lover, I really should start having some women wearing in tights in a scene...I've had 4.5 years and never released a scene I have filmed myself where a woman is wearing tights. So if I am going to start, I may as well know what's what
My personal taste is more for bare legs, but knowing a lot of people like them we do sometimes have the girls wear tights as part of their outfits if they want to and think it'll look good, and they definitely do enhance some outfits, both in how they look and as an opportunity for more messing.
My main rule is if something is being worn it should get messy, as our standard rule is "total coverage". But I wouldn't say the only choices are "tights stay clean" vs "tights filling". Given they're normally worn under a skirt, filling isn't usually going to be that simple. So with our tights scenes, the portion that's visible below the girl's skirt will generally get completely covered by pouring mess on, while the area that's hidden beneath the skirt or dress will generally get messed up by whatever is poured inside the skirt or dress. If someone is wearing a short and non-tight skirt then she may flip it up and then sit in stuff so her tights and underwear get directly messy, but if the outfit is more of a pencil skirt then it'll just be whatever has been poured inside that goes over the hidden part of the tights - we generally pour a lot of mess into skirts and dresses, so our audience knows the girls will end up with very soggy tights and underwear under their clothes.
As your actual bone fide tights lover, I personally find satisfaction in a scene whether they get messy or not. Tights covered in mess? Great! I love mess! Tights spotlessly clean? Great! I love tights! In fact some of my absolute favourite scenes are ones where the girl gets reduced to an unrecognisable mound of mess, but her hosed legs are still clean! See the custom video I ordered 'Jilly Gets Clothed' as an example.
It's ALWAYS the woman who makes the outfit, heels , boots ,stockings, hose , lingerie etc.....sexy and NOT the other way around. This goes for both WAM & Non WAM scenario's I think Tights/hose, like other items of clothing, substances and fetishes just adds to the creative landscape that WAM play has to offer.
I love to see women wearing them (as well as wearing them myself too - lovely feeling when you fill up multiple pairs and feel everything sinking slowly south but held in 'where you want it'! )
Jennifer expressed it pretty much the way I feel too.
However, I do think a reveal of the panty section is certainly an added bonus. Even more so if that area then gets wammed, either by filling, splattering or sitting. It's nice to be able to see them go from clean to messy in slow detail, where possible.
I'd prefer bare legs but if it had to be tights they would have to go to the ankle and have Bare feet.
I seen a hot girl go swimming in real life and it was a big turn on because the tights held water for a bit until they drained out of the material. It the bright sun this made them Really shiny looked amazing. I guess some mess would have the same effect?
It's ALWAYS the woman who makes the outfit, heels , boots ,stockings, hose , lingerie etc.....sexy and NOT the other way around. This goes for both WAM & Non WAM scenario's I think Tights/hose, like other items of clothing, substances and fetishes just adds to the creative landscape that WAM play has to offer.
Just my humble opinion.
totally agree here. I dont think i have any particular clothing related interests (it's more like i have things i'm not a fan of instead) so i'm not sure how lovers of particular items of clothing feel.
For me, outfits provide the frosting on the beautiful cake that is the woman themselves. You can have the cake without frosting but, for me at least, you cant have frosting without the cake. The frosting just makes the cake taste that little bit sweeter.
As an aside, i always prefer my cake to start frosted
First of all can I say that your query reflects the attention to detail in many of your clips, so not a stupid question!
But I wonder if I could put in a word for stockings and suspenders as preferable to tights and as providing a pleasing frame to a subject implied but not stated in your post, viz. knicker-filling.
It means that as, say, custard flows out through some custard-saturated panties, it can trickle down the naked thigh before then continuing down the stockinged leg, and this contrast of bare flesh and (preferably black) stocking material is most pleasing to the eye. In addition, a splash of custard -- or for that matter baked beans or spaghetti -- on stockings is very fine to behold, before the legs get covered completely.
In the terms of your question, a girl in a wam sene wearing stockings and suspenders is sexy per se, although knicker filling enhances the scene considerably.
For me it is pantyhose/tights all the way! but, that Is me. I have noticed over the years that people are either for it or REALLY against it. There are lots of other fetishes out there but the one that gets the most debate/hatred is the pantyhose one (which I never understood LOL)! I May prefer it, but I will never turn off a good sloppy pie fight or gunge bath if someone isn't wearing pantyhose..
the one thing that is the most important thing regarding tights/stockings is making sure the model has them on properly!!. it really p*****s me off when the toe seam is twisted around and can be seen when not supposed to be ie court shoes, with sandals fair enough thats ok
as for the messing of them all is good, though if they are being filled i prefer stuff that doesn't make them look lumpy thats a personal thing and as with all wam there will be someone that likes the opposite thing.
I also love bare legs and shoes
best is to mix it up so everyone gets their sweet treat.
i like to doing different ways to get messy so sometimes i will wear tights with a body/swimsuit under clothes and go for a messy walk so every thing starts up top and eventully runs down inside the tights or i'll wear Knickers and a bra so the mess runs down the outside of the tights and soaks through as it runs down or stockings for simalar route.
another time i will start off pouring stuff in a knicker / tights filling way without getting breasts/body messy first.
then there is getting dressed with clothes from a bucket of mess so the tights/clothes will already be drenched and slippery when going on, i not seen that as much as worn messing of sites.
oh and if you get your models to wear fishnet tights without knickers they will appreciate the extra erotic ribbing where it counts
goodtimes said: I've seen a hot girl go swimming in real life and it was a big turn on because the tights held water for a bit until they drained out of the material. In the bright sun this made them really shiny, looked amazing.
+1
Never had any thought about nylons or tights, until I saw a pair of wet tights. That clinging skirt and shiny legs & feet made that particular woman very attractive at once
That's why Aquantics, the SSS-series, Rob Blaine, Madeleine from Oasis etc. already included nylons or tights in almost all their scenes in the 90's.
Also, tights are supposed to be a 100% female accessory of course, stressing those wonderful legs that ladies have. Those legs get just so much more female when shiny & wet.
I did not care about wam either until I saw Ariel filling another girl's "pantyhose" with apple sauce. It's such a hilarious scene. Ariel & Jayce are very good at pantyhose scenes.
Finally, nylons & tights change colour when muddy and messy. There's a bit of being naughty involved as well, as one is not supposed to destroy them, but that's what you eventually do when messing tights up.
Then some girls rip them in the end, which I now find is another climax. Or they wash them off at the end, then the nylon gets shiny, sometimes revealing a ladder here or there, a proof of the action...
I love tights and tights filling specificalky however I also love the smart look of them. I like stockings too they definitely have their place but you can't beat tights and wam
PiesandWet said: Basically GOT to be wearing black tights for me or I'm not interested! Shinier the better, but as I say it's essential and literally the first thing I look for!'
Yep exactly this for me too! rarely click on pics if there's no tights or stockings involved.
Topcattopone said: I prefer stockings to tights, but ONLY if they are hold-ups! Can't stand those ludicrous suspender belts.
i have always worn and preferred hold-ups rather than suspenders but recently i have started wearing suspenders not exclusively but occasionally.
there have been a few occasions when hold-ups get too slippery to stay up on longer splosh walks where i prefer to have stockings to tights
wearing them in general is alot different to hold ups as you tend to forget you are wearing hold ups where the free movement of the suspenders against your thighs is a constant thing.
When I ws younger I hated tights, only liked sheer stockings, and only when worn normally, under a normal outfit, but gradually they disappeared as everyone started wearing black opaque tights, took years to learn to like them as there was nothing else, and then suddenly the trend became bare legs or ghastly American tan tights..
So for me, the appearance of any hosiery nowadays is so rare that the fact a model is wearing them is enough, clean or messy doesn't matter. I realise some wam producers do a fantastic job of hosiery wearing, but it's still rare in real life.
PennyBanks said: Everyone seems to think I have a tights fetish because I wear them so often....I just can't be bothered to shave my legs that often
This is one of the many reasons I love pantyhose!
For me the appeal is the look and feel of the tights so if they don't get messy it's still hot that the model is wearing them. But I'm also way more into full coverage versus just getting some parts of the body messy so from that perspective I'd rather see them get messy.
Lapwingboy said: When I ws younger I hated tights, only liked sheer stockings, and only when worn normally, under a normal outfit, but gradually they disappeared as everyone started wearing black opaque tights, took years to learn to like them as there was nothing else, and then suddenly the trend became bare legs or ghastly American tan tights..
So for me, the appearance of any hosiery nowadays is so rare that the fact a model is wearing them is enough, clean or messy doesn't matter. I realise some wam producers do a fantastic job of hosiery wearing, but it's still rare in real life.
I also rarely ever see women wear tights in real life, I guess it's just not in style around here. I used to wear them to work every day back when I took the train into the city. It was so amusing to me to catch guys staring at my legs. I never called them out or anything, it was just fun to spot the guys with a fetish who didn't realize how observant I am The one thing I miss about taking the train, lol.