|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"Why is it misleading to post a picture of yourself?"
Love you, too
So I made a thread about a personal WAM related question and my reward for trying to share with this community was the Admin deleted my thread because it was 'misleading'.
you know people, I struggled before doing it and ultimately thought I would trust and share with this wonderful community. It's not easy trust me, it's hard to put yourself out there to online people but I've grown really close to a lot of you and see how special so many of you are that I overcame my anxiety and put myself out there and wanted to see who might like to see me and my wonderful love of my life wife engage in wam activity.
DELETED IMMEDIATELY for a bogus reason because some people **reported** the thread as misleading.
Well who did this. I want to know. I want to put a name to this, to see what people are there lurking in the shadows judging others and making sure when someone does gather the courage to post themselves online to try and share with you all that they are there ready to SHOOT DOWN your thread and the Admin is laughing while deleting it for NO REASON.
What is misleading about posting yourself or your wife? If you can not answer that then tell me why BULLIES are allowed to exert power over people and humiliate them after they were anxious and nervous about sharing and then get a message that they are basically a joke and kicked in the face for the crime of trying to share with the community.
Why do bullies get to anonymously destroy threads, why?
here is the message I got:
> Hi, we had to remove your thread, "Should I mess up my wife and share the pics or videos here?." The reason was: "Thanks for posting but we've had reports the image you have uploaded is misleading, so have to delete."We mean no disrespect by this action! If you think this was a wrong decision, you can Contact Us.
you know people, I struggled before doing it and ultimately thought I would trust and share with this wonderful community. It's not easy trust me, it's hard to put yourself out there to online people but I've grown really close to a lot of you and see how special so many of you are that I overcame my anxiety and put myself out there and wanted to see who might like to see me and my wonderful love of my life wife engage in wam activity.
DELETED IMMEDIATELY for a bogus reason because some people **reported** the thread as misleading.
Well who did this. I want to know. I want to put a name to this, to see what people are there lurking in the shadows judging others and making sure when someone does gather the courage to post themselves online to try and share with you all that they are there ready to SHOOT DOWN your thread and the Admin is laughing while deleting it for NO REASON.
What is misleading about posting yourself or your wife? If you can not answer that then tell me why BULLIES are allowed to exert power over people and humiliate them after they were anxious and nervous about sharing and then get a message that they are basically a joke and kicked in the face for the crime of trying to share with the community.
Why do bullies get to anonymously destroy threads, why?
here is the message I got:
> Hi, we had to remove your thread, "Should I mess up my wife and share the pics or videos here?." The reason was: "Thanks for posting but we've had reports the image you have uploaded is misleading, so have to delete."We mean no disrespect by this action! If you think this was a wrong decision, you can Contact Us.
randm. said: Well who did this. I want to know.
That would be me. You posted a picture of a real person, who I was able to identify very quickly via a reverse Google image search. That person is married, and his wife has received rape threats because people think that she's so much more attractive than him. (Don't ask me to explain the logic behind that.)
I understand what you were trying to do in that thread (parodying other behaviour that goes on here) and if you'd used an AI-generated image rather than a real person then I would have left it alone. However, impersonating a real person without their consent is crossing a line.
Having said all that, it's just my opinion, and I'm not a moderator or admin. That's why I flagged it, leaving it up to those people to make a judgement call.
Of course, if you really are the person who you claim to be then you can appeal against the decision, and you should be able to prove it (getting a green tick in the process).
flank said:
That would be me. You posted a picture of a real person, who I was able to identify very quickly via a reverse Google image search. That person is married, and his wife has received rape threats because people think that she's so much more attractive than him. (Don't ask me to explain the logic behind that.)
I understand what you were trying to do in that thread (parodying other behaviour that goes on here) and if you'd used an AI-generated image rather than a real person then I would have left it alone. However, impersonating a real person without their consent is crossing a line.
Having said all that, it's just my opinion, and I'm not a moderator or admin. That's why I flagged it, leaving it up to those people to make a judgement call.
Of course, if you really are the person who you claim to be then you can appeal against the decision, and you should be able to prove it (getting a green tick in the process).
randm. said: Well who did this. I want to know.
That would be me. You posted a picture of a real person, who I was able to identify very quickly via a reverse Google image search. That person is married, and his wife has received rape threats because people think that she's so much more attractive than him. (Don't ask me to explain the logic behind that.)
I understand what you were trying to do in that thread (parodying other behaviour that goes on here) and if you'd used an AI-generated image rather than a real person then I would have left it alone. However, impersonating a real person without their consent is crossing a line.
Having said all that, it's just my opinion, and I'm not a moderator or admin. That's why I flagged it, leaving it up to those people to make a judgement call.
Of course, if you really are the person who you claim to be then you can appeal against the decision, and you should be able to prove it (getting a green tick in the process).
Exactly. Thanks for your help Flank.
Edit: randm. has been permanently gagged from posting. Impersonating another person and really acting like you're them is fraud.
Stay messy, my friends
Fuck around.
Find out.
Find out.
He's more potato now than man. Twisted and evil.
Thank you Flank, your reward is 11 likes to rand.'s 0. Which I find amusing.
Thank you MM/admins for keeping up with these kind of posts, this person has been skating the line too many times, glad they can't post anymore.
Rand.: Seriously, look at what you just wrote, then look at how you got called out. That is how we see you.
You could have chosen to be a productive member and aided the community. You could have chosen to not say a word. Instead you chose to try and make things worse and so the ban-hammer is wielded again. You really were a negative-sum game.
Thank you MM/admins for keeping up with these kind of posts, this person has been skating the line too many times, glad they can't post anymore.
Rand.: Seriously, look at what you just wrote, then look at how you got called out. That is how we see you.
You could have chosen to be a productive member and aided the community. You could have chosen to not say a word. Instead you chose to try and make things worse and so the ban-hammer is wielded again. You really were a negative-sum game.
