Greetings, Like other mud fans here, I'm often scanning youtube for Mud content. mostly looking for Wrestling content but I often widen my search to see if I missed anything. A good day is when I find a preview of something I havent seen on UMD and I'm able to find the producer's site and buy the full video. Often I see videos from muddy boots producers, but I rarely see them here. I was wondering how close the muddy boots is to mud wrestling in my case and it would let me totally stung to see 2 absolutely hot girls knee deep in mud stop and call the scene a day..!?
So to my question to muddy boots fetishist; Does it ruins the scene if the girls get completely muddy after they have wrecked their boots? For me I can't understand why a producer would stop the scene there.. I mean the model is in the mud.. paid, camera rolling.. Cut!!..
is the muddy boots market that much bigger than the muddy girls market that a producer can ignore the other?
I am of the opinion that the former is certainly a bigger market however the toxic community of piracy has ruined the market as it costs much more to provide and produce quality coverage related content so the hard working men and especially women, are deprived and end up getting cut out of market. Compared to production of just a boot getting messy. I pray everyday that we encounter a similar renaissance era of producers that can afford to create content and a respectful community that ensures their growth and pirates meet a pitiful end with their attempts to undermine this community.
When I see a quicksand video that is 20 minutes long, I am like dang, I would really like to see another part-2 that is 20 minutes long featuring romping and wadding through mud while showing off the body. The video mostly features a head and the audio.
So I have the same question to quicksand fetishist. Does it ruin the scene if there is a part-2 showing the model get out and do other things in the mud that show off the body?
It seems like a boots fetishist has no interest in mud on the body, a quicksand fetishist is only interested in the sinking into mud and not the body, and the general mud fetishist just wants to see a subject's body get muddy. It seems like someone who makes one type could expand into the others and make more money because I would buy the general mud fetish videos, but not boot and quicksand videos. A lot of producers only make the content that they are interested in though.
I have specific enjoyment of mud and find that once a video has gone past a certain stage, it no longer interests me as much (I like the process of progressively muddying clothing, once full coverage is achieved any subsequent wallowing is largely pointless to me as a viewer). I think the "smart" producer maybe knows that and will put out material that satisfies multiple facets of this rather marvellous kink that we are blessed with. Detail people like me can enjoy the first ten minutes, and coverage people can enjoy the last ten minutes, that kind of thing.
wam_guevara said: Greetings, Like other mud fans here, I'm often scanning youtube for Mud content. mostly looking for Wrestling content but I often widen my search to see if I missed anything. A good day is when I find a preview of something I havent seen on UMD and I'm able to find the producer's site and buy the full video. Often I see videos from muddy boots producers, but I rarely see them here. I was wondering how close the muddy boots is to mud wrestling in my case and it would let me totally stung to see 2 absolutely hot girls knee deep in mud stop and call the scene a day..!?
So to my question to muddy boots fetishist; Does it ruins the scene if the girls get completely muddy after they have wrecked their boots? For me I can't understand why a producer would stop the scene there.. I mean the model is in the mud.. paid, camera rolling.. Cut!!..
is the muddy boots market that much bigger than the muddy girls market that a producer can ignore the other?
Cheers!!
Logistics may be a factor. Much easier to wash your model's feet & shoot again as opposed to them needing a shower & fixing their hair & makeup etc for shoot #2 & #3 out in the muddy fields.
Also some models may be happy to get their feet muddy on camera, but baulk at a full wallow, head to toe.
Lauren19 said: I have specific enjoyment of mud and find that once a video has gone past a certain stage, it no longer interests me as much (I like the process of progressively muddying clothing, once full coverage is achieved any subsequent wallowing is largely pointless to me as a viewer).
We are all different. I like to see the entire span of the clean woman getting muddy, perhaps clothing coming off, then wallowing around in the mud. The longer she is muddy, the more entertained I am. There is nothing 'pointless' at all in continuing it, especially if there are some slight variations.
There is nothing 'pointless' at all in continuing it
You seem to have misunderstood my comment. I was talking very personally, and also felt that I offered a balanced view, admitting to enjoying material that was longer and went into tangents that I didn't desire, as long as the metrics that I love were hit earlier. I feel like you've read my comment and subsequently come out fighting, without understanding my point. Apologies if I've got this wrong. But the mansplaining is heavy round here and patience runs low at times.
Tariq Israel said: I am of the opinion that the former is certainly a bigger market however the toxic community of piracy has ruined the market as it costs much more to provide and produce quality coverage related content so the hard working men and especially women, are deprived and end up getting cut out of market. Compared to production of just a boot getting messy. I pray everyday that we encounter a similar renaissance era of producers that can afford to create content and a respectful community that ensures their growth and pirates meet a pitiful end with their attempts to undermine this community.
I agree. I know I stopped because of the pirating and I think a lot of others feel the same
Wouldnt mind love but will take anything I can get
So I have the same question to quicksand fetishist. Does it ruin the scene if there is a part-2 showing the model get out and do other things in the mud that show off the body?
I am one of those. Answer: We're not all alike. Some don't want a Part 2 because it ruins the fantasy. Other quicksand fans love to see an aftermath.
It would be true that when I first got into the quicksand community, I was not really aware that anyone would be interested in a Part 2 that was strictly wet, muddy and playful. But when I got acquainted with UMD, I realized that I was a fool to have ever turned off the camera.
I have known producers who won't film a thing if they don't personally like it. I guess I could never be moved to film a thing that I actively disliked, but what's not to like about plunging right back into the mudpit? And I was already there! It was such an easy scene to bag!
I did try to be sure there was a firm dividing line to provide sinking-only fans a way to escape. And I believe in honest descriptions of the video while trying to sell it.
There is nothing 'pointless' at all in continuing it
You seem to have misunderstood my comment. I was talking very personally, and also felt that I offered a balanced view, admitting to enjoying material that was longer and went into tangents that I didn't desire, as long as the metrics that I love were hit earlier. I feel like you've read my comment and subsequently come out fighting, without understanding my point. Apologies if I've got this wrong. But the mansplaining is heavy round here and patience runs low at times.
It was very clear to me that you were talking personal taste and I'm not sure how anyone could read anything else into your initial comment. Also, even as someone who loves seeing someone wallowing in mud completely covered, I admit that there is something uniquely appealing about seeing clothing of various textures covered in mud. Just the act of covering clothes in mud manages to be so naughty in spite of the wammer not being nude.
Also, even as someone who loves seeing someone wallowing in mud completely covered, I admit that there is something uniquely appealing about seeing clothing of various textures covered in mud. Just the act of covering clothes in mud manages to be so naughty in spite of the wammer not being nude.
I got to admit I have a liking for that too. It can be hard to manage for a solo performer who doesn't have anyone to help haul the muddy wet mess out, but if I found something awesome while thrifting, right away I'd be thinking, "I gotta try to wear that. Yep I do. I really love it."