I'm was thinking about Human Garbage Disposal customs, and some WAM friends & producers tell me that we could expand the possible models if I dropped the open legged element. For me seeing the pussy is super important so I thought this kind of defeats the purpose of the scene, but I am curious to what others think?
If you've enjoyed these scenes, please indicate your preference.
I voted no, but that's not the whole story. It isn't necessary, in fact nudity isn't a requirement for me - other aspects are more important. But it is something I enjoy seeing. If you had the same model, both nude, same set up and same mess but filmed once with open legs and once with closed legs, I'd buy the open leg. It's definitely an aspect that makes me lean more towards downloading a vid.
I like tasteful nudity or the model wearing something skimpy like a thong. Seeing too much actually ruins it for me. To me, wam and porn are two very different things.
Bobographer said: I like tasteful nudity or the model wearing something skimpy like a thong. Seeing too much actually ruins it for me. To me, wam and porn are two very different things.
This is exactly how I feel about it. Slime porn for me scratches a different itch than explicit/regular porn. And I rarely want the two to be combined.
If a model will do the open legged element then it's definitely better. If there were some really great models who say they would do it if they didn't have the open legs element then maybe worth considering for odd scenes. In general I do think the open legs adds a lot to a hgd scene so would stick with it.
FlintM said: If a model will do the open legged element then it's definitely better. If there were some really great models who say they would do it if they didn't have the open legs element then maybe worth considering for odd scenes. In general I do think the open legs adds a lot to a hgd scene so would stick with it.
Out of curiosity how did you vote? We're following the vote .
Not necessary for me (and humiliation isn't my thing), but they're not my customs: they're yours. As long as a model and producer are willing to bring your wishes to life, get what you want and don't worry about what the rest of us think. That said, as a savory fan. I really enjoy your scenes and the variety of models you've gotten to feature. Cheers!
But I have a difference of opinion on the HGD set versus the ones you've commissioned from Rev Slymsford. The girls seemed really uncomfortable during the HGD sets, perhaps solely because of the savory substances, but I think the pose had something to do with it as at least one of the girls seemed hesitant from the start. I watched two of the HGD scenes and, frankly, they are purchases I regret because I did not enjoy those because of the obvious discomfort the girls displayed. (Note: I'm 100% sure the girls did it willingly b/c MG would never force but it doesn't seem like they had fun with the experience.)
The ones you did with Rev Slymsford, especially the water ones, I really really liked.
I really love the spread eagle/pool/pussies wide exposed. It's so daring and bold but the girls really enjoy it despite how exposed and vulnerable they are during it. I can imagine myself really getting a thrill from having my vagina exposed like that to the world and how nervous I'd be to do that. But it's done in such a great and supporting environment and the girls are clearly having fun--and that makes me happy and watching some lovely ladies express their sexuality positively and boldly is a big point of excitement for me.
Pie_Cook said: Not necessary for me (and humiliation isn't my thing), but they're not my customs: they're yours. As long as a model and producer are willing to bring your wishes to life, get what you want and don't worry about what the rest of us think. That said, as a savory fan. I really enjoy your scenes and the variety of models you've gotten to feature. Cheers!
Savory but not humiliation? That's interesting I always thought they were linked.
I really love the spread eagle/pool/pussies wide exposed. It's so daring and bold but the girls really enjoy it despite how exposed and vulnerable they are during it. I can imagine myself really getting a thrill from having my vagina exposed like that to the world and how nervous I'd be to do that. But it's done in such a great and supporting environment and the girls are clearly having fun--and that makes me happy and watching some lovely ladies express their sexuality positively and boldly is a big point of excitement for me.
This is interesting as well. The water scenes arn't actually my customs.
For me, the excitement comes from seeing the squirming discomfort, and also from the total exposure. I also like it best when the model seems like the type of model who would never ever go for this kind of scene. For example, the Tatum one is one of my favorites, because even in her pie scenes she seems to want to stay clean, so to have her totally exposed and plunged into this ridiculous over the top scenario for me was a huge winner.
I think you (Scroggle) and I share similar tastes in savoury humiliation WAM. On the question of open legged, a change in one word in the poll question would have changed my vote.
Is open legged necessary for my enjoyment of savoury humiliation wam? No. Indeed, like NastyGunge, I have commissioned customs that start clothed and closed legged.
Is open legged **preferable** for my enjoyment of savoury humiliation wam? Yes! For me, watching a woman squirm as their pussy is exposed to savoury mess is deffo a big turn on for me! It adds to the humiliation factor.
I should clarify/add that the "open-legged"-ness is in the context of me being a straight cis-guy attracted to messy girls.
Closed leg would be fine too, as long as the model can remain fully nude. If this tempts more models willing to consider HGD then it seems like a very small compromise to make (for my preferences anyway).
Wamlanta said: I would enjoy them more with no savory at all. Oatmeal, cake batter, pies, brownie batter, I'm all for.
This^. I really like the bound concept and do like the open leg aspect, but wouldn't mind if some models preferred not to, but the savory is the turn-off for me.
I can take or leave the the visible vagina aspect - I LOVE the spread, naked legs part but if they were wearing underwear it wouldn't bother me. But as some have said, these are your customs - we can take or leave them!
I've only got the first two MG scenes so far (Tatum and Amber) and for me the more important factor is the acting/reactions. Like I love the setup, but there's a whole chunk of story missing from denying payment to "okay, now this guy has stripped me and put me in this position", and for that to work, I'd then expect a lot more verbal pushback from the models to this guy, especially before the mess starts being poured. Like, this is a very weird situation!
Also no laughing at all (I know this is really hard to quell in the moment though) and - the thing that weirds me the most - when they obey instructions like "head back". Those aspects just take me out of things a bit.
But I recognise these are "me" issues (That may even go away in later scenes)
I just have to say, it is blowing my mind that there are 64 people (at the time of this message) who cannot get off or enjoy a messy video if the model isn't spread leg and showing her pussy.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that or that it's weird or anything. But it is absolutely mind blowing to me.
From a content perspective, there's not even that much stuff out there that satisfies those parameters... especially from before @Scroggle started doing his customs with @MessyGirl...
I'm so curious to hear (if anyone is willing to share) what videos/stores have been satisfying your needs open-leg-messy-pussy fans?
ArchNemesis said: It's a fun novelty, but I'm sure for many not at all required.
I have a scene coming up which involved this bit of absolute sexiness.
That's what I would have thought! It might be preferable, but not *required*. Yet, there are, at the moment, 64! people who have voted that it is in fact required for them.
For me it is not absolutely necessary for it to be visible. It will never be a dealbreaker for me.
The head and the face will always be the best place for the mess for me. That is where the reaction comes from anyways, so it makes sense to me at least that you want the mess there.
But I understand that some people have certain preferences.
KelseyRose said: I just have to say, it is blowing my mind that there are 64 people (at the time of this message) who cannot get off or enjoy a messy video if the model isn't spread leg and showing her pussy.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that or that it's weird or anything. But it is absolutely mind blowing to me.
I suspect most people interpreted the question as "Would you enjoy the scene LESS if the model weren't spread leg?" Instead of "this is absolutely necessary to enjoy the scene and I'd be bored with it if not for that." At least, that's how I took it.
I know it says "necessary" and that has a strong and particular meaning but that doesn't mean people read that that way. I've learned over the years that the answer you get depends highly on how you ask and care is needed to make sure you dont accidentally get the answer to a different question than you really intended.