So many more posts are now alot more sexual than when I first found The Ultimate Messy Directory back in 2004. I guess that's why there are more people producing content and more 'interest ' in the fetish as a whole.

I have dabbled in messy sex and blowjobs but for me sexually, messy doesn't have to be sexual at all in order to get me sexually aroused. In fact the less sexual the better. The actual act of just getting messy or seeing a lady get wet and messy fully clothed does more to me...without seeing boobies or vaginas, or any sexual content. Just seeing custard trickle down a ladies face hair or body, clothing. I just wondered how many just like the actual act of messy with no sexuality.

Yes! ....This!!

I love the look of mess running down a female body.....

I usually still get jumped, but still......

LOVE your pics...

To put metrics into perspective, there is a lot more EVERYTHING on UMD than there was back in 2004. And yes, while there is a lot more sexualized things here, there is a lot more that isn't too.

For instance Leon's catalog probably quintupled since 2004 and very, very little of his content is sexualized at all. DungeonMaster1 likewise has some of the most heavily clothed content I've ever seen.

There are producers then who are no longer with us, and producers today who were too young to be here in 2004. There are niches WITHIN niches here now, from wrist watches to inside out sweaters. People who HATE hosiery with a passion, to those who love it. Heated arguments about the best trajectory for launching a pie that rival sports arguments about pitchers or quarterbacks.

Is there more porn, yeah, definitely. But there was a LOT then too. Messyfun, WSM, Fets, and Femanic just to name a few. But many of them were not necessarily "on" UMD either except as links which is how the site started.

To your other question: wet and messy is sexual to me, but the content shown doesn't have to be explicit. There are fully clothed scenes that didn't involve sex, touching, kissing, romance, etc at all that that I have found EXTREMELY arousing.

Just as I see an attractive woman my mind goes into the gutter, it does more so if said attractive woman were say coming out of a pool in her dress.

I am the same, in 21+ years of being on here my entire 'collection' is clothed (or topless as there is only so much choice).
It is the mess, the expression and way the model reacts that does it for me, no need for sex at all, but that is not surprising given I have almost zero libido and am also asexual .
I guess it is vicarious as I would love to be in their position being messed up by someone/them. The idea of being in the gunge tank, being pied, going down a slide into a vat is more arousing to me than watching someone masturbate or have sex.

I'm in a very minute class of wam fans who love to see skin, sensualness, but not the crotch or toys. There is a tasteful way to present nudity, and when it's combined with wam, it's my favorite. As soon as a dildo is added though, the bubble is burst. I can't explain why, just as I can't explain why I love wam. One of those mysteries. Here is the kind of image I love. (and yes, that's Ariel)

I'm with Bobographer on the use of toys, maybe I'm old fashioned, they sort of put me off. That said natural copulation is ok, I was a big fan of Sticky Tara and Steve, whose messy sessions often, but not always were taken to the natural conclusion. More recently ZTD and her partner used to indulge in their own sexy messy play, family circumstances make that a little more difficult now. I for one miss them.

However one of the photographs I most enjoyed is a very old picture of a girl having been messed up with custard, face to the camera pictured from the waist up, wearing a blouse. She grins to the viewer and is reaching inside her blouse cupping her breast presumably to remove some of custard. No body parts are included in the shot, but to me that is such a sexy picture. Don't ask me why because as cannot explain it.

As has been said on many occasions in discussions on this site. There is room for all, just scroll past that which does not appeal to you.

Happy messing.

it is exactly those words that I have at the beginning of my store, "No nudity, just wetlook and messy clothes, fun above all", but tastes are tastes, and the best thing is that here at UMD there is a lot of variety. Thank you for the excellent work you are doing.

You simply have to follow what your muse tells you.

People here like you very much. Whatever you do will work out.

You guys are making me/us feel better about our non nude content, lol.

I was beginning to think I was a very small minority that just liked the mess and clothing.

In general I find a great deal of artistic satisfaction in creating work that blurs the lines between art and porn. It is with tongue planted firmly in cheek that I call most of what I do "cake porn". Because WAM is not my personal kink, I find producing it to be an awesome way to explore color and texture visually. The only times I tend to incorporate explicitly sexual elements like toys and penetration are when the models have indicated that is something they want to engage in with our shoot.

Wam has its appeal without it needing to be sexual. The reason I like it is because it syncs up with my liking of feet. As the OP mentioned, mess all over someone has a visual pleasing to the eyes.

I enjoy the full range, from tame and fully clothed with absolutely no sexual content all the way up through absolutely depraved and extreme sexual content. As long as the girl is having fun with it, I can enjoy both ends of the spectrum and everything in between.

While I enjoy a good hard-core WAM scene very much, one of my favorites is a complete amateur girl (shy ones even better) who has never done anything like it before having genuine reactions to just getting messy.