This is an odd post for me, as I've always said I get annoyed with posts that might advertise 'Woman in bikini gets slimed', then the pictures only show her from the neck up. (with maybe one blurry or distant photo of her showing the bikini)

So I'm a fan of showing a woman's body - clothed or not, but preferably not clothed too much.

So along comes an opportunity for me to shoot with a new friend who loves the idea of getting messy on camera. She told me she's purposely fallen into a fountain and also over-shampooed her hair, but never gotten messy . . . yet.

It looks as if we'll be shooting some messy content soon, but here's the reason for this post. As much as I am a fan of all-over mess, Jen will only be comfortable with photos or videos shot from the boobs up. She's body-conscious and made me promise not to show any of her below the boobs.

So this is where my question comes up, in the form of a poll. With wam turning more and more towards the porny side of things, how happy would you be to see an attractive young lady enjoying big messes mostly to her face? Jen wants her hair and makeup trashed, and the top of her t shirt or dress as well. (similar to the photo, but that is just a figurine) She plans to be braless too. Personally, I'd like to see more of her, but this will have to do, and I'm not complaining about finding a new friend to get messy. So what do YOU like to see? Keep in mind that the more of the body seen, the farther away the model usually is from the camera.

Seeing a lady's hair getting messy is essential for me!
There's something about it, maybe because often ladies make a great real of effort to present their hair beautifully!
So the hair looks good, even if the model's outfit does not particularly appeal to me!
Usually seeing the mess going down their cleavage is nice too!

As long as the face is covered, the rest of the body is a sweet, sweet bonus.

This is exactly what Jen plans to be doing! She says she wants to wear scoop-neck tops to let lots of mess go in. Her hair and face will go from magazine cover model to disaster. She won't show below the boobs though.

Yeah, I'm with this. I voted 'head to toe' but it's got to start with her hair. And while nudity isn't essential for a head to toe, if her outfit's not appealing then I'm happy to stick with hair, head and face only

Pussy and face. Perhaps in some sort of gunge tank constructed from a gynocology chair.

0.01% It's burqa covering one eye or nothing for me.

Being a fan of all over mess and the freedom it allows me to have, as a woman to share more bare skin... I also like to see it from others. The more the better.
This is also my feeling toward male messes. If you're in the "throws" of a big mess, sometimes its quite liberating to become more and more exposed, even if you didn't originally plan on it. Just my 2 cents.

I personally prefer a full body experience in any situation with my preference being from clothed and filling and messing that up then slowly stripping down to absolutely nothing

I enjoy seeing a woman naked and wearing very little get messy from head to toe or even stripping down to nudity is more sexy to me! Great poll Bobographer!

That sounds just great!
Jen should only do what she feels comfortable doing, and let's hope that she really enjoys it!
That comes across too in the pictures!

She basically said she's wanted to get crazy messy for a long time, so I have a feeling the enjoyment of it will show once she finally starts to do it for real. She said she has an inner exhibitionist who will really love showing off this way.

So it looks as if Jen won't be seen below her boobs, but I wanted to chime in and say my own preference is to see women nearly naked in messes. I won't pressure my new model into doing anything she doesn't want to, but at least we'll get to see her from the boobs on up.

Full respect to you following your model's feelings on this, at the end of the day their desires and comfort must always come first. But in answer to the question of what I personally want to see in scenes:

For me it's not WAM if you can't see the model's skirt or trousers getting messy. And note "getting", meaning their lap (assuiming sitting) must be in shot as the mess is being applied. I remember once seeing a scene where a model wearing really nice satin finish trousers was gunged with stuff poured over her head. The camera operator filmed it waist-up only, and then to add insult to injury, did a "nod down" at the end to show us the aftermath of all the amazing mess on her trousers that they'd completely failed to film happening. "Videographer beaten to death with a succession of deep-frozen sea-bass" would be way too lenient.

I've had similar frustrations. I saw a video where the model wore nothing but a clingy red dress which was low-cut. She was standing and having melted ice-cream poured over her head. You could see more and more of it going down her top, but the fabric was tight and it stayed in a bulge above her boobs. Suddenly the bulge gave way, and you saw it move down over her stomach and it would have also gone over her crotch. The model looked down at herself while grimacing from the sudden cold. I was waiting to watch it run down her legs or out from the bottom of the dress, but they must have used the same videographer who shot only from the waist on up. Dungeonmaster, where do I get that sea-bass?

I'm mainly a face and hair person. There are other aspects that are fun, but those are the ones I want to see. In fact, I enjoy more "natural" WAM, like after-a-food-fight looks, rather than "manufactured" WAM where the mess is just excessive and done for the sake of it. I know the latter seems to be predominant, but it's not my first choice.

I voted head to toe, even though I am mostly a face person-- pies in the face is what I am after. That said, I love a nice body and it is great to see the whole models beautiful body when she is pied. E.g., Anglefan does shoots with gorgeous models sitting on chairs with skirts or shorts that are great. Art Student is a particular fave. I also like nice clothes-- business suits, dresses, etc. And for that to work, it helps to see head to toe.
Body parts I like to see messy, in relative order:
Face
.
feet
.
.
.
whatever else

'How much of a woman...'? She needs to be a WHOLE lotta woman!

I don't know of a non-crude way of saying this,
but, woman sitting in a chair with legs crossed the entire time does NOTHING for me.
Not sure if there's a polite way to suggest to a model:
"Keep your legs apart for maximal sexiness!"
But, given all the OTHER wild & crazy things I see those who pay for customs
as well as the producers already ask the models to do
(bondage, blindfolding, tongue-sticking out, strap-on dildos, forced funneling)
& that the models obviously consent to, I don't see my request as unreasonable.

I do want to see the woman from the crotch on up. So, medium shots are actually ideal.
Mediums & closeups are fine. But, again, no point to this if she's not standing
and if she is not either in a bikini or bra & panties or
some kind of lingerie showing the entire arms & legs.
And, shots from the backside, too, maybe an equal amount to front shots,
or a 1:2 ratio, is good.

Some models are better than others at reading my mind & knowing how to act
slapstick humiliated without over-doing it. Really, they don't have to do much,
don't have to say much. Just act sort of fake pissed off. Don't wipe away
for a long time.