One thing I like is when a gal gets pied while wearing heavy eye makeup, and it gets ruined (either by pie or water) and adds to the mess/humiliation. I was hoping we could start a thread of these pics?

This is Jessica from Gooey Girls UK. She's one of my two favorite "models that got away." She did a few sheets with GGUK, then no one ever heard from her on here again. It would have been great if she wanted to keep up with it. I'd buy nearly any video (or set of still images) she modeled in. (My other favorite model who had too short a run in WAM is Nikki from "The Lucky Bachelorette" and "Nikki Takes on Paris.")

Amen! More messy girls with heavy black eyeliner.

Weird! Unsure why the image was removed. I kept the watermark, and it was a promotional image, not one of the ones I had to pay to see.

Here it is.

Sorry, my friend, but it would have been deleted because of the topless nudity, not the copyright.

As you may know the site has had to create a verification system by which individual users submit an ID and effectively become accountable for any content we post. Only then are we allowed to post 'explicit' images and media. Topless female nudity has been included in this exceedingly broad definition.

Ah, OK, thanks for that clarification. I was confused, now I am not.

I suppose GooeyGirls UK had submitted an age verification for her when they were selling the scenes here.

It's not the model who needs to be verified, but the person posting the image. You upload a copy of your passport or driving license and MM stores them encrypted and off-line. That verifies your account, after which you can post anything legal, all the way hardcore / explicit images if you want to. The rules come from the credit card associations, and are a response to the big tube sites which used to allow unverified users to upload rape videos of children and refused to do anything practical to stop such abuse. It has a side benefit in that it's largely eradicated casual piracy of the type that used to happen on PH - no-one is going to upload stolen content when they can be held accountable for doing so by their real ID.

Thanks for that info! I've been here long enough my profile is over 23, lol. I'll fix it. I suppose when I heard that news, my mind just figured it was for producers of content.

Like this, maybe?

Bee

yesb

I personally do NOT like this look.... and even tell my models to wear waterproof eyeliner or mascara! That said, they rarely listen to me.
SOOOO..... There's quite a few instances of this throughout my catalog. The one that stands out is SS171, the last one with Kristina (who should've known better by then).

I didn't get extensive screen grabs of her eye makeup running (remember, I don't like this!) but it happens a LOT in the first half, and you can see some of it in the pic below. But if you like this kind of thing, SS171 Scene 2. SO much running makeup!

EDIT: Just screen grabbed a few shots. Full on racoon eyes after the first pie, and it only gets worse. I actually wipe away a LOT of it, several times, and it keeps running. Wish I'd known this was a thing, I would've left it all on!

Rich and Mrs Bee: Those are perfect examples!

My new custom from Hannah Perez.

Oh yes, I've got a few pics like that.
Nothing better though than getting all made up first xx