What is an aspect you are looking for in a video that you never see any producer (or model) get juuuuust right? There is always something missing.

Never enough Golden Girls. Or when there is a Golden Girl, it's always Estelle Getty.

The slime is never the right consistency. While cake batter slime is easy to make, and makes a nice slime, it's not my preferred slime. And the european style gunge does have it's uses, when I see that slime, I think "aliens". If I had unlimited funds, sets, and actors, I would probably use european style gunge for alien slime.

The arms and bucket are always visible. I really like when the slime comes from nowhere, like it an act of nature.

Oh, this just gives me a great idea for a video I can never make! An alien and an earthling meet. They both live in a universe where one can get slimed, and whenever the alien it around someone, they get slimed in alien slime, which is triggered by a word or phrase which, in their alien language means I don't know, but in English, it could be a rather common word or phrase.

jaykain, you're hanging out with the wrong sample group of women.

For me, the shoes - preferably high heels - are very important. Way too often, the models seems to be wearing high heels, but the pics and videos fail to focus on anything below the knee.... Of course - not meaning all producers - some are great - but way to often the opportunity to show messy feet/shoes are missed... I

28 minutes of continuous messy action. 2 girls. Thick gunge. Made in the UK.
I really do think it's time this completely false "UK gunge is thin and runny" myth was buried once and for all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFsYsR-H4NA

Personally, I really like the videos where (even if it's genuine or rehearsed) an "innocent bystander" is dragged into the mess, such as "an intern" or the "makeup artist" etc. love seeing the girls you see every once in a while get involved.

Game show hosts getting involved with the mess is also delightful.

Come to think of it, a super hot teaser would be a vid where there is a contestant getting slime repeatedly by a very well dressed and attractive host. The video ends without the host being messy at all, and at the credits there would be like a 2 second flash of the host compeletly messy with the attire they were wearing the whole game

So you wouldn't want to see the host go from neat to messy?

The forced or assisted self pie. Very rarely does this get properly executed.

I think we already had a thread like that a while ago.

I'm bothered by nonsense, 3 minutes exposition to a 7 minute video, a green screen that is not properly lit (I prefer a clean green rather than a pixel messy background), adding titles and fancy graphics...
also, story wise, it's sad when they aren't good enough and over do it (I usually find a simple solution for that in my head and wish it wasn't so problematic that the model was having hard time to follow the "story")


No need for another male to appear on the scene, no need to see his reaction shots (all the time... it's mostly not funny or helpful), I don't want to see the producer or another male get messy on the set - that has stopped me from buying (if you want to appeal to a bigger crowd, edit different takes).

reactions are important, it's weird how sometimes they are spot on and other times (even by the same actress) they go so wrong. I'm looking for the humiliation/crying part, which doesn't always exist.

I really appreciate the unedited/bloopers at the end.

I said this before - it was boring then and, so help me God, it'll likely be boring now: I like when the lady's eyes are open post-pie. As in, really like it. I don't know why. It's just extremely hot to my warped little brain. To wit (courtesy of SSS):

Some models need effective coaching on how to hold a pie exactly. Too often they never use their palm and hold the base of the pie tin. They seem to hold it on the side or edge and never get any uumph on the pie hit. Soooo disappointing. Just an observation.

Haha... I encourage this, but not every model can (or will) do it! And I'd rather have her keep her eyes closed than have eye issues later on.
Also, it's ironic that you praise a clip (SS01 Scene 5!) that Eba44 (the poster directly above you) would never buy on principle (as I let Liz pie me at the very end). Diff'rent strokes, I guess.

It helps if you have real pies, and cakes are even better... Like, Breana tends to keep her eyes closed on principle, but not for cakes. (Or the occasional real pie....)

This. What I am saying is: you are choosing from the wrong sampling of women. I've personally known a few women who can cum quickly, on demand. I wouldn't bother saying anything except you claimed an indisputable fact. Though at this point we'd really be arguing anecdotal evidence.

What bryce said!!

Woman here, and when I'm in the mood I can make myself cum 20+ times in a row, in as little time as a minute or two each time if I want!

Wammer of the Day for that, folks, amirite?

So good to have a woman's input on women having orgasms!

Thanks, Kittenish!

Norman

Rich, I don't care if Breana keeps her eyes open or closed; she looks so cute and so hot in all of these pics! Wow!

Norman

I'm interested in more sensual as opposed to overtly sexual clips (think expensive lingerie vs. slingshot). I like both, but there's far less of the former on the market.

Also, well-done sexy co-ed clips with high quality mess.

I couldn't agree more, Kittenish!

I love sensual as opposed to overtly sexual. I think that's why I like the "girl next door" type. Some women are like, "This is over-the-top sexual". The "girl next door" seems like she would be more romantic and sensual.

I love the look of expensive lingerie. As far as slingshots, they might as well be naked, for me.

Norman

You know how if you see a guy pieing another guy, it's usually with reckless abandon? I've yet to find a producer or combination of models be able to pull that off in a girl-girl scene. I get that part of it is guys have bigger hands and thus can hold the tin in their hand better to get force behind it, but it's even beyond that - it's the....what's the best word.........maybe aggressiveness........about it that seems like a WAM white whale when it comes to girl-girl scenes.

Agreed, and even when you instruct models to hit hard, they're usually far more gentle about it that you need.
I've had it happen a few times tho... The 3-girl scene from SS58 was the definition of "reckless abandon," and it's a ton of fun even if not all the hits land exactly.

Beyond that, a lot of the Shelly two-girl clips have very aggressive hits. Mainly SS133, 134, and 138. I always wondered why they didn't sell better. (Beyond, ya know, Shelly...)

We've done a handful of slingshot scenes, but there's far more lingerie clips in my library. (For that matter, there's quite a few playful PG and PG-13 co-ed scenes too.)

But that said, the three best selling scenes I've had in the HD era have been two slingshots and Kylie's topless one, so the market clearly has other ideas.

I am the same way! i can make myself cum over and over. i have actually had to stop videos bc i was too exhausted to go on and to be quite frank....didn't have much bodily fluid left! lol! XD my new video is one of them. the last messy one. its 45 minutes of just messing myself and making myself get off to getting messy and after that amount of time...you can see my face as i am up close to the camera just like "oh my god, okay i have to go bc i need a fucking nap!" lol! XD

i agree with pie hits. we dont fuck around in the house of mess or wambabes with pie hits. we actually have a video in the house of mess (its still there) that is a "hard pie hitting contest" and we fucking SLAMMED eachother. thrown pies, palmed pies smushed into the face, palming the tin adn just slinging it perfectly onto the face, literally knocking eachother down with pies.
most of our scenes we have about taken eachothers heads off. we have had to tell girls "you can hit me harder than that!" hah! and its great. they get such a kick. as far as slime (and yes, i am tooting my own horn) i think i made the best couple of slimes in the world then jilly helping us make 3 of the best slimes ever ever ever but i have seen some amazing slimes. like mrs. t stuff....that green slime they use is SO HOT!
ill have to put up some pics of our slimes that i have just been in awe of that we have come up with.
to stick to what you said, i HATE IT WHEN i see a video where there is tons of mess, it could be a lot of fun and be really sexy and the chick is just standing there. so many opportunities for a witty retort or a sexy moan or laugh or even a *humph* crossing arms and making a cute little retort. and. they. just. stand. there. NOTHING WORSE.


https://umd.net/download_info/extreme-suit-filling-hardcore

https://umd.net/download_info/the-wambabes-gameshow-with-b

https://umd.net/download_info/jayce_and_ariels_hard_pieing_c

My arm swung back like that in that last pie picture? i actually swung from there and i rung her damn bell! she took it like a champ! mad as fuck and ready to get me back!! XD goign through these videos is making me all misty eyed!

Guess for me it's not really the models per se, but the style... all the locked down / tripod shots, or the stand in front of the camera, I mess you / you mess me shots, etc.

I fully realize that a lot of scenes are shot by individuals, or a few people...all of whom may be in the shot itself, so a lot of this is out of necessity. This is more of an observation vs a 'gripe'! But I really love it when the camera pans over the girls body, zooms in/out and really captures all the oozing, dripping, glistening mess... especially with a little incident high lighting and possibly even in slow-mo! Though this obviously requires an additional person to run the camera and I could see how it would be doubly difficult in a deep mud pit ... though my hand is always raised to volunteer!

...and of course anything with wrestling, slipping, sliding, bodies rolling around, etc is way more interesting to me than just the "stand in front of the camera slapping mess on each other" shots.

There are lots of things people get wrong, and anyone who's ever produced a wam video will know how tricky it is to get everything right, but there is one thing that utterly destroys a scene: Bad camera work. There are several screaming howlers which crop up:

1. Zooming in. Some people appear to be obsessed with their camera's zoom function and instead of setting up a nice steady shot, they keep zooming in (sometimes to a ridiculous degree) and missing half the money shots as a result. There is a time and place for zooming and panning, once the model is completely covered, to show off all the glistening detail in glorious close-up. But when the gunge is happening, the camera should be steady and show the whole scene, either knees to head or feet to head, so we, the audience, can just enjoy the view as the model gets messed up. Watch a few feature films - notice that the camera almost never zooms while a scene is rolling. Zoom lenses are meant for setting up the framing of a scene before its shot, not using while shooting.

2. Shaking cameras. This is sometimes a subset of zooming, especially in outdoor scenes where the camera operator doesn't want to get their feet wet or muddy and tries to film from the bank. WRONG!!! As Rob Blaine said more than 20 years ago, it is impossible to shoot good mud scenes unless you're willing to go right into the mud with your models and shoot from just a few feet away, and I'd say that applies to wetlook too. When a camera is zoomed in, the tiniest motion of the camera is massively amplified - the scene ends up gyrating about like a small boat in a force ten storm. Go in close and shoot in wide angle. Having said that I've also seen a scene where despite being zoomed out, the camera continuously gyrates about, rendering what's otherwise a good scene, pretty much unwatchable. Basically, cameras should not shake.

3. Just general bad camera angles, especially these four:

3.1. Completely missing the point. I once saw a scene advertised as a jeans scene. Yet at one point where a model is lowering herself into a tank of gunge, the actual point of contact at which her shoes and jeans are going into the surface of the gunge is out of view below the bottom of the frame. Someone was shooting a jeans scene and yet decided, at the actual point where the model's jeans were going into the goo - the actual money shot moment - that it was more important to film her head and upper body. I can only assume that was a hired-in camera operator who didn't understand the genre.

3.2. Backlit scenes. This has been mentioned a few times over the years, and is a perennial problem, especially in beach wetlook scenes, that is as old as WAM - there are classic photosets from the 90s that have this issue. Part of the problem is our eyes can see a much wider dynamic range than a camera can. Generally if looking as a human viewer, even if the scene is backlit your eyes will still pick out details of the models' outfits as they get wet. But the camera, with its lesser dynamic range, will only see a silhouette, all detail lost. The trick is for the camera operator to wade out beyond the models (or at least beside) and make sure it's their sunlit side that is facing the camera, so the detail is captured. Even when it's cloudy, one side will be better lit than the other, and that's the side to film.

3.3. I've seen several scenes where a model is going to sit down in mess or water, be it in a bath, in a puddle, in mud, whatever. The money shot at this point is the model's bottom going into the mess. But for reasons unknown to science the producer films it from the front, so you can't actually see what is happening. Either go round behind or get the model to turn round.

3.4. A special place in WAM-hell is reserved for this one: The down-pan. This is where someone has a model sitting down for a gunging, films just their head and upper body as the gunge is poured all over the model, and then, after the pouring is finished, quickly pans down the model's lap and legs to show us the aftermath of all the brilliant stuff they could have just shown us happening if they'd bothered to film from a bit further back. KILL IT, KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!

it is actually easier for a woman to make herself cum than a man to make a woman cum. we know what to do, we have been doing it for a long time! just like dudes know how to get themselves off. i know more than a handful of guys that are friends of mine that can get themselves off in less than 2 or 3 minutes. bc they know what feels perfect and they have been doing it a long time! lol. its a great release! whoever this person is that cant get themselves off, this girl....please, i beg of you, get her a hitachi or something bc i feel bad for her!! we girls gotta get our rocks off and if we do it covered in mess....its even better!! for real though. the hitachi, is quite possibly the best invention in the world and i am NOT a "toy" person usually. i have my purple friend and i have a small vibrator...when i got the hitachi....the whole game changed!!!!

In fairness, this IS the unofficial motto of the UMD.

Yes, I absolutely would. However, if it was just a quick flash like that, it would leave so many questions unanswered and so much to the imagination.

I love the old Gungegirls when host Lauren would get the tables turned on her, it was not very often at all.

I really REALLY want to see the hosf Patricia Abravanel from "Cante Se Puder" get messy, but I have had no luck.