I'm more in favor of it being used as a tool to enhance older WAM videos and pictures as opposed to creating videos and pictures of WAM that never happened.

It's getting better, but still looks way worse than the real thing.

But, I jacked off to a fake picture of a naked Lara Croft in 2000, so I'd probably Jack off to poorly made videos of fake women getting messy in 2025.

The thing that really gets me is the idea of "waming"people we know.

For example, I have an ex from years ago and she's active on social media.

Now my question is, could I theoretically upload her images into a Lora or hugging face or something similar, grab some wam videos for ai training, then use some "donner footage" from a producer and have ai use my ex as a stand in for a model? Like a face swap type of deal?


And if so, I think that's where the danger comes in. Fetishized content without consent. Feels like there's no way to stop it regardless of KINK. But I feel this type of behavior will really destroy a persons soul.

The thing that really gets me is the idea of "waming"people we know.

For example, I have an ex from years ago and she's active on social media.

Now my question is, could I theoretically upload her images into a Lora or hugging face or something similar, grab some wam videos for ai training, then use some "donner footage" from a producer and have ai use my ex as a stand in for a model? Like a face swap type of deal?


And if so, I think that's where the danger comes in. Fetishized content without consent. Feels like there's no way to stop it regardless of KINK. But I feel this type of behavior will really destroy a persons soul.

AI is the shittiest its ever going to be right now. I imagine in 10 or 20 years from now all porn will be AI and it will be absolutely fucking insane.

Everyone is afraid of AI because of the "Terminator" series. AI won't have to create armies of robots to enslave us. Through the years we will become more and more reliant on AI, and AI will enslave us through our vices.

AI will also make people billionaires, so maybe invest in Nvidia.

Nothing to do with terminator, more to do with copyright infringement, impersonation, scams, and job losses.

As long as it isn't being released as live or is infringing on someone else's work, I see nothing wrong with it.
Change is always happening, and if you don't accept it you can get find yourself being left behind.
Who knows? Someday the haters may even embrace it when it improves to the point you can't tell the difference between AI and the real thing. Now, using it to advance a political or social agenda from one side or the other, I would strongly object to, but that's for another debate.

There a couple people who are making short WAM videos with AI who are really quite good at it (take a look at Smushingtin on Instagram), but it is still lacking. Particularly from a pie perspective. But, the amount of improvement in the reality of the productions over just one year is pretty remarkable. The models-- i.e., the people in the vids -- are nearly reality quality.

The problems:
1. The people are too perfect. Humans have flaws. All the women in these vids are near perfect which ruins the illusion.
2. The pies are weird. They are more placed or dropped gently on the face, rather than smushed or hurled. And, again, they are too perfect. HUGE pies with full coverage. Needs to be more realistic.

Make no mistake, on the current trajectory, AI WAM will be very popular even with many of the naysayers here just because it will only be limited by imagination. Visually it will be very close to reality.

I am old and don't have the time or inclination to learn how to use it. But if I were a WAM entrepeneur, I would set up a site for dodos like me to purchase AI vids (when they get better). Use drop down menus. Like ordering from a deli or Chipotle. Give me a brunette, looks kind of like _______, dressed as a French maid, 2 pies thrown, sploshed with chocolate, etc. Small charge per request.

After the ethical concerns about non-consensual portrayals of people, my biggest issue with AI is the A part of it. One of the most important aspects of WAM for me is seeing a real person also enjoying this niche turn on of mine.

Knowing that the image or video clip I'm looking at contains a scenario and person that never existed kills it for me. That's why I fear when we get past of the point of being able to tell the difference.

Though like any technology, I still see benefit in it. I've used it to enhance older images from before we all had 4K cameras in our pockets. At least with that, the subject is still real.

I'd be interested to see how I'd feel seeing AI imagery of a WAM producer put out by that same producer of situations they fantasize about but are too big/expensive for them to perform on their own. I'd still want real content but I might be able to enjoy that since there is some reality behind it.

Maybe it will get better and better, but it's also possible that we'll see a "Habsburg effect" (similar to in-breeding). If all future porn is AI, that means that it will wind up being trained on its own data. That could lead to weird effects, e.g. models with grotesquely large breasts and tiny waists (similar to some 1990s superhero comics).

Related to that, the AI videos that I've seen aren't doing anything innovative. That's not necessarily a problem, depending on what you want. E.g. a lot of people prefer to eat at McDonalds rather than Michelin star restaurants, and they'd rather watch Love Island than a Shakespeare play.

In the case of WAM, suppose that your goal is to have an attractive model who says "I don't know" then gets slime poured over them while they sit/stand still and tilt their head back. I think it's plausible that AI videos will be able to replicate that quite well.

However, my favourite WAM videos are the ones with spontaneity and personality. E.g. gameshow WAM where the models get competitive, or the old video with JellynCustard and MyPierogative where they tried to burst a balloon full of gunge by sitting on it and burst into laughter when they kept slipping off. SS283 from SlapstickStuff is another good example, where the models were sliding around on top of each other. I don't think we'll be getting that type of video from AI any time soon.


That's another issue to consider - right now it's cheap (or free), but that's because the big companies are dumping loads of money into it as a loss leader. In the longer term, I'd expect the price to go up, and it might wind up being more affordable to do it "old school".