AI is a blessing for WAM pervs.

Pfft, 5090



All kidding aside, the RTX5090 is my unicorn. Assuming I can justify the expense anyways. I am still stuck on buying lenses *shrug*

Clankers, bots, clickers, sloppers, groksucker, bot lickers, gear grinders, wirebacks, tin skin

I like groksucker. I have not heard that one before. I gotta add it to my vocabulary.

I honestly was thinking of patenting "Grokfucker". It has potential, I feel. ".io Hoe" is another I been trying on but still not as catchy as "Sirislut" or "Beta Banger"

.io hoe works!!! I work with a dude that insists on using draw.io for network maps and it is a shit program compared to visio or literally anything.

I haven't noticed the flood of AI content because I have the synthetic filter enabled.

> Is AI-wam killing real mess or killing umd?

To understand the impact it is having, you need to ask questions like these:

1. Have producers left due to AI-wam?
2. Have potential producers given up before starting due to AI-wam?
3. Has anyone paid for subscriptions to generate AI-wam rather than produce it, get customs, or buying existing content?

I think surveys or interviews would be needed to understand the impact AI-wam has had. I think it could certainly kill potential for real wam being created. It is also important to ask: Has AI-wam inspired anyone to create real content? It could also have a positive impact.

I think there are a lot of things that kill umd, real wam, cause producers to quit, or cause customers to leave. Such as:

1. Producers not being able to afford to make wam due to lack of profit.
2. Too much prep and cleanup effort.
3. Piracy.
4. Drop of audience due to age verification.
5. Producers ditching umd for OnlyFans.
6. Producers are not able to book models due to availability or costs.
7. Life changes or retiring.
8. Oversaturated market with too much existing wam to compete with.
9. New producers are unable to compete with other established producers.
(I don't know if these are the reasons. There may be more or less. It is just my guess.)

So now, I think AI-wam is just yet another reason why existing producers might quit or new producers might never start. That is unless people believe that the AI-wam being created is actually inspiring and drawing more customers and producers to real wam rather than driving them away. It is possible.


I don't think it should be banned. I would like ai-wam to be banned if any of these circumstances were true:

1. If there was no synthetic filter.
2. If a number of producers made an ultimatum and said they will leave umd unless ai-wam is banned.
3. If people submitting ai-wam were breaking laws and making illegal content that could risk umd being sued.
4. If there was evidence, polls, or a survey that proved that it is causing a negative impact to umd.

I can understand why Your Wet Cat and a few other producers would want it banned. I think it must feel discouraging. Creating real videos takes physical and mental effort in the planning, prep, performance, filming, editing, and everything else. It can require creativity and skills. I feel like it could be discouraging to put in the effort but not get the views, loves, comments, and sales that you were hoping for. Now you have to wonder why, and when you look to see what is being posted you see a bunch of ai wam. So now you have to wonder if people would rather generate content rather than look at the real content you made. The ai wam will depict unachievable scenarios and set unnatural standards of what women should look like. It is becoming easier to generate and more realistic. Some people that used to buy content will start generating content. I think it is growing exponentially too.

I wish I could look into the future and see what it is like 5 years from now. Maybe AI-wam needs to be banned now to save the real-wam market. Or maybe the AI-wam becomes so good that the majority of people like it. Or maybe it busts and flops where generating content becomes too expensive.

I have to agree Ai is fast killing the fetish scene, not only is its impact hitting us on here but other platforms are being targeted too like fetlife and others the worst effected seem to be Instagram for images and Ai generated profiles.

A friend had been chatting to what he deemed to be a genuine person the other day but later found out it was an Ai chat bot - he complained to the admin and got laughed at! but it does raise the question I guess as some sites have started to implement new members holding a piece of paper with there username and date of birth on, so admin's can verify who's real and who's not upon joining.

Verified accounts get more access than non accounts to members photo's/ videos and how many times they are allowed to message people.

With as much push back as we are seeing in the states to data centers, I am thinking we will see token costs go up before we see "AI" leave here. I would think like any site this site has it's peaks and valley's. But I think the age verification requirements will drive people away before "AI" does. It would be interesting to revisit this topic in a few years and see if daily user visits goes up or down on the average. I hope that "AI" does not replace producers here. I look at producers here much like the people that made movies during the VHS boom when the move was made to DVD. How there was a dip in material, but slowly content started getting made for DVD by other indie movie makers. Then the cell phone advancements made it possible for more people to shoot and make movies. I think that now we are seeing a resurgence in movies much like the VHS boom. It makes me wonder if we will see the same thing here once "AI" interest goes down either due to cost or the buzzword wears off. Kind of like the death of AOL.

I can get behind this one. My momma live out in Memphis and the new data center there be givin her migraines all day and ruin her water. Fuck AI man glad you championing this

Yeah, I am down with banning AI crap here. The AI people and AI bots can make their own AI forum where AI bots can talk to each and post AI pics all day. Fine with that. Like anyone, I've played around with it. But it is, in the end, bullshit. Let's just keep the real people here, please.

It seems to me that there's a certain confusion of concepts here that distorts the essence of the issue.

There are people who enjoy wam as a process, a sexual experience, and so on. No AI can replace that. At least not until it learns to transmit sensations directly to the brain. So for them, AI is just a niche form of content.

But there are content creators for whom this isn't just a hobby--it's also a tool for monetization. And those creators tend to take a tougher stance toward AI.

AI has become part of our reality. Just accept it. Banning AI is essentially censoring content based on how it's produced. It's kind of like banning the sale of goods that are assembled in a factory rather than by hand. Yet handmade items are more alive than anything else.

I'd say that WAM is a very niche segment of content. People come here with very specific, niche goals, most of which AI is fundamentally incapable of fulfilling--at least from an aesthetic standpoint. Some people just want beautiful images. For others, it's about bold imagination. For some, the act of creation is what matters. For others, raw emotions are what matter. And in my view, most of these people are still able to distinguish AI-generated content from the creative work of real community members.

If you don't like AI-generated content, you can simply filter it out. The same goes if this is a matter of principle for you. If, on the other hand, you're afraid that AI will compete with you for users' attention, then it means that the process and your involvement aren't as important to you as the specific result. This isn't good or bad--it simply shows that you're pragmatic.

For some people, AI is simply a tool for bringing ideas or fantasies to life and sharing them with others as vividly as possible. For others, it's also a form of creativity (after all, not everyone knows how to write, draw, or film beautifully). For still others, it's a way to bring to life rather "extreme" fantasies that not everyone would dare to act out in real life. And they, too, want to share these fantasies. I don't see anything wrong with that--especially if the person openly states that it's AI-generated content.

It's simply a matter of personal preference. Just as this whole niche topic is a matter of personal preference for each of us.

If, however, you see this as a threat and competition... I have bad news for you. You've most likely already lost this battle. And now you're essentially trying to impose your point of view instead of giving people a choice based on their preferences.

And, speaking for myself, I'm not really into AI-generated content. Nor am I a big fan of 3D content on that topic. But the fact that it exists doesn't prevent me from enjoying your creative work at all. Because I'm capable of deciding for myself what interests me and what doesn't--without anyone's help. So for me, flexible content filtering is the best option available.

If I've offended anyone, please forgive me. These are just my thoughts and musings out loud. There's no ill will intended.

Best regards

As a real life model thank everyone for standing up for our work!!!