PhotoSlop said: The third one here is a re-creation of something I was "privileged" to see in person. (The brown dress one)

You Can Call Me,

Al

PhotoSlop said: The third one here is a re-creation of something I was "privileged" to see in person. (The brown dress one)

You Can Call Me,

Al

rt2018 said:
You chose great outfits!

Silver_sea said: I am not sure MM's ruling on this. In the UK, Deepfaked pictures that are shared for sexual gratification is being made a criminal offense by up to 6 months in jail.

I know that is not going to happen here, most likely someone will just ask them to be taken down, but we need to be careful of using celebrities and manipulating their images for porn.

Trouso said:
https://umd.net/termsofservice/#deep_fakes

These particular images don't specifically identify as any particular person.

The dangerous territory is where an individual is both positively identified and nudity or a patently sexual act that never happened is portrayed. This has not been allowed on this site for a long time in regard to celebrities.

Deep fakes putting real people in other situations which some of us might find titillating or arousing is very difficult to either define or prove intent.

Having said that, it's still not good form if that individual has no idea their image/likeness is being used.