Tonight on her show, samantha bee took a pie in the face from terry crews. Pie didn't stick that well but it was a decent scene

http://youtu.be/HHGvxXEupLc?t=295 at 4:55

The pie did stick

Some did. Just not enough.

Very normal things to imagine about a woman.

And definitely not at all based solely on her expressed political opinions!

Samantha Bee's jokes are too squishy and centrist for me, and yet I somehow manage not to have a weird scatological fixation on her. What am I doing wrong?

I'd rather see Mrs. Bee pied.

You're watching too much mud wrestling and not enough bullshit.


I would wager that most of us can agree on that.

So would I.

Regis: sometimes your snark, faux boorish-ness/dick-ishness is quite funny...this is not one of those times. Your un-founded/unwarranted defaming of Sam Bee now makes your shtick look genuine, thus making you look like a real dick.

People thought Reege being a dick was just schtick?

Some other guy says Samantha Bee looks like she made a mess in her adult diaper, but I'M the asshole?!

Of all the things Sir Regis says, THIS is the thing that makes him offensive??

I would actually really like to know what you said that was considered wrong or dickish ?

you said she was not funny, that makes you a dick??? what am I missing here ?

WTF?

uuuhhhhh..... What?

If this is porn, I weep for the future humanity.

My best guess is that wamajama got honestly confused here and took out his righteous indignation on the wrong target. Clearly, if anyone looked like a real dick in this thread before wamajama got here, it was Johnny_Yen.

Of course it would be best if wamajama himself would clarify the situation, but In my experience, he often leaves remarks in threads that he never revisits, or at the very least he doesn't bother to respond to questions or comments that his own posts have generated within the thread. (I remember a few years ago wamajama commenting that he's typically high when he peruses the UMD forums, if that perhaps helps explain any of the behavior described above.)

By the way, it should be pointed out that this is very likely NOT the same Johnny_Yen who was a forum participant for many years (although the two J_Yens seem to align in political conservativeness). The old, long-running J_Y deleted his account and began life anew here as JaMC about six months ago. The J_Y account that made the post above is only two days old, as of this writing, and this is the only comment he's left so far. So... he's likely a lonely troll-booth operator working the night shift.

I feel like we're losing sight of the big picture here, which is that Mrs. Bee needs more pies. You know, in the name of bringing everyone together.

Along with Samantha Bee, I also hate actual bees. I'm pro-colony collapse disorder thanks to that one bee that stung me when I was seven. (Ow!) Watching Monsanto gradually avenge me has been one of life's little pleasures over the past decade. Take that, bees!

It should be noted that Mrs. Bee is one of the most delicious pie targets of all time, so the fact that she eclipses Samantha Bee in this "contest" should be considered no great slur on the latter.

Yo, Peiromaniac too:

"Of course it would be best if wamajama himself would clarify the situation, but In my experience, he often leaves remarks in threads that he never revisits, or at the very least he doesn't bother to respond to questions or comments that his own posts have generated within the thread. (I remember a few years ago wamajama commenting that he's typically high when he peruses the UMD forums, if that perhaps helps explain any of the behavior described above.) "

1] I do apologize to Regis, not sure how my brain mixed up the attribution of the dis to Sam Bee. totally MY BAD. Please forgive me.

PS: You may apply my comment to Johnny Yen ...his comment is so mean and disconnected to reality, I can only suspect some sot of (political?) bias and/or a certain degree of dickishness.

2] I spend only a limited time on the UMD, and not everyday. So, often I reply to something,then forget that I replayed to something, then come b back a day or two later, and sometimes find "self-righteous" types soap-boxing through their anonymity (as if any of you know anything about me). Further, most of the threads that I comment on, I have found, end with me as the last commenter/poster, In the other cases, I either forgot (not important enough to remember), or, my last comment was all that needed to be said (by me). I'm not one other those who must ALWAYS HAVE THE LAST WORD (so somebody please comment after this post )

So P-too, send me some threads to justify your claim -- put up or shut up (as Ghoul-iani says)

3] I am not always high, or even, most likely high, when visiting the UMD (as I am not now high)...if I am high,(rare these days) it is in the evening, and I am almost never on the UMD in the evening. the fact that you would dig up such a trivial comment from several years ago, and throw it up now (for no apparent reason other than dick-ish-ness), only indicates how long you carry a grudge (for comments made on a mostly anonymous fetish forum). SAD.

4] Not important, at all.

Wamajama,

I'm sorry I've offended you with my remarks.

RE: my comments about you often posting on a thread and then never coming back to it: I'm not a human rollodex, I don't have a bunch of examples at my fingertips, but it's a pattern I've observed here for quite some time. Not daily, not weekly, but many times over the past few years. Here's one very recent example, only a week old as of this writing:

https://umd.net/forums/youtube-pie-2

You commented that the couple in question had apparently done other pie videos in the past. You're the only one who made that claim. It doesn't sound like you actually saw the other videos, but you at least knew something about them somehow. Two other posters quoted your comment and inquired where these other pie videos might be found, and there was no response from you. Of course, you don't owe anyone any kind of response, so there's no harm no foul here. And this may well be one of those threads that you deemed not important enough to revisit, and that's totally fair. But it also happens to be the latest example of the trend of you not always returning to threads you've posted in. Please understand I wasn't criticizing you for this behavior, just noting that it was an observable trend in your posting behavior so that people would understand they might not see another comment from you on this thread.

Since you were very casual and open several years back about the fact that you were usually high when on the forums, I thought it wasn't a big deal to mention it here, but obviously that was an error on my part and I apologize for bringing it up. I thought it might partially explain why you might get confused about who said what, and thus make an unfounded accusation like you did against a (relatively) innocent party like Regis. Clearly I was wrong in this supposition, and I'm sorry for having made it. I've been known to smoke more than my fair share in the day, so coming from me, mentioning this is not a self-righteous accusation, more just an understandable reason why things might sometimes get a little fuzzy.

Please note, however, that I did correctly intuit that you'd merely gotten confused about who the "real dick" in this thread was and said that very clearly. The rest of what I said about you was not some grudgeful attack but rather an explanation as to why you might not be back to this thread again to straighten the matter out. Clearly I overstepped my bounds in doing so, but my intentions were certainly not malevolent.

So I'm glad that you did come back and clarify matters, and I will refrain altogether from further comment on you from this point forward (with the obvious exception of you possibly wanting to continue this conversation further, but I hope we can just let it end here peacefully.)

Now kiss