|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"Question for our fans"
Love you, too
Many years ago we combined paint and pies with Lexi. It was the only time we combined the two wam styles. We are thinking of doing more of these, but only if our fans would like to see this.
Discuss
Discuss
The WAM Trendsetter Since 1997
Nah! Paint is real turn off for me. But I guess it is not the same for others.
I Love Lexi annnd Pies!! 
but paint, I do not like… combining them together though….I have mixed feelings about that!!! 
but paint, I do not like… combining them together though….I have mixed feelings about that!!! 
My ha'penny worth:
This may sound a bit odd, but the thing that would make me renew my MG membership would be some harder content. Not necessarily guys and girls, but a little more toys and g/g would go down (pun intended) nicely. You have gorgeous girls and perfect pies, but there's just that itch that needs scratching. I want to see people 'enjoying themselves' (and others!), because, to put not too fine a point on it, that helps me enjoy myself...
I know you are awesome at this, the Zeyda/Wednesday pie and slime session has to be one of the hottest the UMD has ever seen.
Go on, take us to new heights!
This may sound a bit odd, but the thing that would make me renew my MG membership would be some harder content. Not necessarily guys and girls, but a little more toys and g/g would go down (pun intended) nicely. You have gorgeous girls and perfect pies, but there's just that itch that needs scratching. I want to see people 'enjoying themselves' (and others!), because, to put not too fine a point on it, that helps me enjoy myself...
I know you are awesome at this, the Zeyda/Wednesday pie and slime session has to be one of the hottest the UMD has ever seen.
Go on, take us to new heights!
Once more unto the beach dear friends...
I'm surprised of the dislike of paint here. Personally, I think that the paint sets are some of the best things that you do (along with your "grease" sets and the buttercream you have been using). I'm not really partial one way or the other on the paint and pie combination (although I do love that set), but like the paint sets any way that you do them.
Can we have paint, pies and.....white jeans?
I want to get muddy and messy
Paint doesn't do it for me. It almost makes the model into a statue, somehow deprives them of their sexiness. Other peeps no doubt love it.
I haven't paid for MG content in a long while - last time I tried to sign up, the MG signup page had major problems with my locale which triggered an anti-fraud warning on my card - oops !
If you don't mind a little honest criticism, I really liked the content back then but the previews look a little generic now - white background, single nude girl, single mess, standard model poses. The stuff I liked most on MG back in the day was Raven's head dunking with another girl - they looked like they were having a lot of fun and there was some great sensual chemistry. Liz Ashley is spectacular but I find Lexi a little too young-looking and doesn't look overly interested in the sessions, perhaps because they're just a bit of packaged model work.
I prefer models dressier, with different setups, some genuine fun, and a combination of WAM-interested models and messes - the MG stuff looks like what it is, a time-limited model session without too much staging, repeated in the same white-background location for an easy cleanup without too much destruction of expensive clothing. Don't get me wrong, there's some really great material there, but it's not something I'd necessarily want to subscribe to to see what's coming next, because it doesn't vary enough in the setup.
I haven't paid for MG content in a long while - last time I tried to sign up, the MG signup page had major problems with my locale which triggered an anti-fraud warning on my card - oops !
If you don't mind a little honest criticism, I really liked the content back then but the previews look a little generic now - white background, single nude girl, single mess, standard model poses. The stuff I liked most on MG back in the day was Raven's head dunking with another girl - they looked like they were having a lot of fun and there was some great sensual chemistry. Liz Ashley is spectacular but I find Lexi a little too young-looking and doesn't look overly interested in the sessions, perhaps because they're just a bit of packaged model work.
I prefer models dressier, with different setups, some genuine fun, and a combination of WAM-interested models and messes - the MG stuff looks like what it is, a time-limited model session without too much staging, repeated in the same white-background location for an easy cleanup without too much destruction of expensive clothing. Don't get me wrong, there's some really great material there, but it's not something I'd necessarily want to subscribe to to see what's coming next, because it doesn't vary enough in the setup.
I love the application of paint, and follow up with mess as long as they don't act statuesque and instead joke and laugh and talk. LOVE,
What I'd really love to see is more makeup and mess. Clowns, aliens (green body paint and bald cap), costumes, etc. That'd make me squirm.
To be honest, I've been a Messygirl Member for about 2 years, and more if you include off and on, and the content has gotten a bit repetitive.
What I do love is your recent inclusion of dialogue and engaging with the camera more than posing. I would love to see more of that. Making the video more human and engaging, in general, would be more fun, and thus more sexy.
So that is my input. I'm not jumping ship, but some changes would be amazing.
What I'd really love to see is more makeup and mess. Clowns, aliens (green body paint and bald cap), costumes, etc. That'd make me squirm.
To be honest, I've been a Messygirl Member for about 2 years, and more if you include off and on, and the content has gotten a bit repetitive.
What I do love is your recent inclusion of dialogue and engaging with the camera more than posing. I would love to see more of that. Making the video more human and engaging, in general, would be more fun, and thus more sexy.
So that is my input. I'm not jumping ship, but some changes would be amazing.
Oh, and one more suggestion: thickening the pies with something like buttercream would really make me squee. Lenny and WAMtec's early stuff with colorful, adhesive pies are something I can watch infinitely. The light cream wipe off just kind of removes a certain element of transformation for me.
One man; one opinion, but suggestions nonetheless
One man; one opinion, but suggestions nonetheless
how about liquid latex and pies?
Wamdeluxe said: Paint doesn't do it for me. It almost makes the model into a statue, somehow deprives them of their sexiness. Other peeps no doubt love it.
I haven't paid for MG content in a long while - last time I tried to sign up, the MG signup page had major problems with my locale which triggered an anti-fraud warning on my card - oops !
If you don't mind a little honest criticism, I really liked the content back then but the previews look a little generic now - white background, single nude girl, single mess, standard model poses. The stuff I liked most on MG back in the day was Raven's head dunking with another girl - they looked like they were having a lot of fun and there was some great sensual chemistry. Liz Ashley is spectacular but I find Lexi a little too young-looking and doesn't look overly interested in the sessions, perhaps because they're just a bit of packaged model work.
I prefer models dressier, with different setups, some genuine fun, and a combination of WAM-interested models and messes - the MG stuff looks like what it is, a time-limited model session without too much staging, repeated in the same white-background location for an easy cleanup without too much destruction of expensive clothing. Don't get me wrong, there's some really great material there, but it's not something I'd necessarily want to subscribe to to see what's coming next, because it doesn't vary enough in the setup.
I haven't paid for MG content in a long while - last time I tried to sign up, the MG signup page had major problems with my locale which triggered an anti-fraud warning on my card - oops !
If you don't mind a little honest criticism, I really liked the content back then but the previews look a little generic now - white background, single nude girl, single mess, standard model poses. The stuff I liked most on MG back in the day was Raven's head dunking with another girl - they looked like they were having a lot of fun and there was some great sensual chemistry. Liz Ashley is spectacular but I find Lexi a little too young-looking and doesn't look overly interested in the sessions, perhaps because they're just a bit of packaged model work.
I prefer models dressier, with different setups, some genuine fun, and a combination of WAM-interested models and messes - the MG stuff looks like what it is, a time-limited model session without too much staging, repeated in the same white-background location for an easy cleanup without too much destruction of expensive clothing. Don't get me wrong, there's some really great material there, but it's not something I'd necessarily want to subscribe to to see what's coming next, because it doesn't vary enough in the setup.
All this.
Properly messy paint is fine, but this body painting nonsense is just lame. To me, it's almost exactly the same as the airbrush-painted tits you see in the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition.
I would add my voice to those who say they are not a fan of paint. Especially in the 'painted model' sense like in the pics. As part of a scenario, where someone pics up a tin of paint and pours it over the other girls head, and later is hit by pies...that would work fine. But having a painted model pied would actually be a turn off. Sorry.
Subscribe! Stream 1750+ scenes for $17 a month.
wambob said:
All this.
Properly messy paint is fine, but this body painting nonsense is just lame. To me, it's almost exactly the same as the airbrush-painted tits you see in the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition.
Wamdeluxe said: Paint doesn't do it for me. It almost makes the model into a statue, somehow deprives them of their sexiness. Other peeps no doubt love it.
I haven't paid for MG content in a long while - last time I tried to sign up, the MG signup page had major problems with my locale which triggered an anti-fraud warning on my card - oops !
If you don't mind a little honest criticism, I really liked the content back then but the previews look a little generic now - white background, single nude girl, single mess, standard model poses. The stuff I liked most on MG back in the day was Raven's head dunking with another girl - they looked like they were having a lot of fun and there was some great sensual chemistry. Liz Ashley is spectacular but I find Lexi a little too young-looking and doesn't look overly interested in the sessions, perhaps because they're just a bit of packaged model work.
I prefer models dressier, with different setups, some genuine fun, and a combination of WAM-interested models and messes - the MG stuff looks like what it is, a time-limited model session without too much staging, repeated in the same white-background location for an easy cleanup without too much destruction of expensive clothing. Don't get me wrong, there's some really great material there, but it's not something I'd necessarily want to subscribe to to see what's coming next, because it doesn't vary enough in the setup.
I haven't paid for MG content in a long while - last time I tried to sign up, the MG signup page had major problems with my locale which triggered an anti-fraud warning on my card - oops !
If you don't mind a little honest criticism, I really liked the content back then but the previews look a little generic now - white background, single nude girl, single mess, standard model poses. The stuff I liked most on MG back in the day was Raven's head dunking with another girl - they looked like they were having a lot of fun and there was some great sensual chemistry. Liz Ashley is spectacular but I find Lexi a little too young-looking and doesn't look overly interested in the sessions, perhaps because they're just a bit of packaged model work.
I prefer models dressier, with different setups, some genuine fun, and a combination of WAM-interested models and messes - the MG stuff looks like what it is, a time-limited model session without too much staging, repeated in the same white-background location for an easy cleanup without too much destruction of expensive clothing. Don't get me wrong, there's some really great material there, but it's not something I'd necessarily want to subscribe to to see what's coming next, because it doesn't vary enough in the setup.
All this.
Properly messy paint is fine, but this body painting nonsense is just lame. To me, it's almost exactly the same as the airbrush-painted tits you see in the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition.
Obviously as a producer you have to make whatever you want to make, but since you're asking our opinions, I agree with all this!
My favorite MG shoots that come to mind are the Lexi as a schoolgirl saying she won't chew gum in class and Lexi pulling strings and saying "I wonder what this does" and getting slimed. Would love to see those or something of a similar style re-enacted with Lane!
I'm also going to join the choir of those who are not paint fans. For me, the first pie in the face should come when the model is dressed the way she might be out in the "wild,"--real life--streets, parties, red carpet, whatever...but being nude and bodypainted or green slimed first breaks the illusion too much. It's not to say I think this is really going to happen in "the real world," but I like to keep a very limited number of factors undermining the suspension of disbelief.
Sponsors
Design & Code ©1998-2025 Loverbuns, LLC 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Epoch Billing Support Log In