|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"just found"
Love you, too
Pro tip: When making a thread about a find, include some description of the content
... although I do have to ask:
Why is it that the vast majority of these, "check this out" , "you'll like this" or "great link" threads about non-descript mystery finds are so very often xxx porn links? Is it against some moral code to just come out and say, "XXX find" and then in the thread say something like, "Hey guy check out this girl being fucked up her ass while a blowing a midget while simultaneously having chocolate sauce poured on her back!"
... although I do have to ask:
Why is it that the vast majority of these, "check this out" , "you'll like this" or "great link" threads about non-descript mystery finds are so very often xxx porn links? Is it against some moral code to just come out and say, "XXX find" and then in the thread say something like, "Hey guy check out this girl being fucked up her ass while a blowing a midget while simultaneously having chocolate sauce poured on her back!"
Really great link, crazily hot!!
Enigmahood said: Pro tip: When making a thread about a find, include some description of the content
... although I do have to ask:
Why is it that the vast majority of these, "check this out" , "you'll like this" or "great link" threads about non-descript mystery finds are so very often xxx porn links? Is it against some moral code to just come out and say, "XXX find" and then in the thread say something like, "Hey guy check out this girl being fucked up her ass while a blowing a midget while simultaneously having chocolate sauce poured on her back!"
... although I do have to ask:
Why is it that the vast majority of these, "check this out" , "you'll like this" or "great link" threads about non-descript mystery finds are so very often xxx porn links? Is it against some moral code to just come out and say, "XXX find" and then in the thread say something like, "Hey guy check out this girl being fucked up her ass while a blowing a midget while simultaneously having chocolate sauce poured on her back!"
Dude, it costs 5 seconds to check, what he posted. :ohbruther:
And even IF he describes, what it is about you still have to check if it is something for you.
But 5 seconds...yeah, thats a huge amount of time...
Valor said:
Dude, it costs 5 seconds to check, what he posted. :ohbruther:
And even IF he describes, what it is about you still have to check if it is something for you.
But 5 seconds...yeah, thats a huge amount of time...
Enigmahood said: Pro tip: When making a thread about a find, include some description of the content
... although I do have to ask:
Why is it that the vast majority of these, "check this out" , "you'll like this" or "great link" threads about non-descript mystery finds are so very often xxx porn links? Is it against some moral code to just come out and say, "XXX find" and then in the thread say something like, "Hey guy check out this girl being fucked up her ass while a blowing a midget while simultaneously having chocolate sauce poured on her back!"
... although I do have to ask:
Why is it that the vast majority of these, "check this out" , "you'll like this" or "great link" threads about non-descript mystery finds are so very often xxx porn links? Is it against some moral code to just come out and say, "XXX find" and then in the thread say something like, "Hey guy check out this girl being fucked up her ass while a blowing a midget while simultaneously having chocolate sauce poured on her back!"
Dude, it costs 5 seconds to check, what he posted. :ohbruther:
And even IF he describes, what it is about you still have to check if it is something for you.
But 5 seconds...yeah, thats a huge amount of time...
Dude, it takes most people less than 1 second to type X three times. And dude, some people don't like to go to porn sites. Dude, some porn sites have malware dude. Dude, yeah less than 1 second dude yeah dude lot of dude time there dude.
Valor said:
And even IF he describes, what it is about you still have to check if it is something for you.
But 5 seconds...yeah, thats a huge amount of time...
And even IF he describes, what it is about you still have to check if it is something for you.
But 5 seconds...yeah, thats a huge amount of time...
You might like this:
http://bit.ly/1NF1kAt
Enigmahood said:
Why is it that the vast majority of these, "check this out" , "you'll like this" or "great link" threads about non-descript mystery finds are so very often xxx porn links? Is it against some moral code to just come out and say, "XXX find" and then in the thread say something like, "Hey guy check out this girl being fucked up her ass while a blowing a midget while simultaneously having chocolate sauce poured on her back!"
Why is it that the vast majority of these, "check this out" , "you'll like this" or "great link" threads about non-descript mystery finds are so very often xxx porn links? Is it against some moral code to just come out and say, "XXX find" and then in the thread say something like, "Hey guy check out this girl being fucked up her ass while a blowing a midget while simultaneously having chocolate sauce poured on her back!"
Can I get a link for that video please.......
Enigmahood said:
Dude, it takes most people less than 1 second to type X three times. And dude, some people don't like to go to porn sites. Dude, some porn sites have malware dude. Dude, yeah less than 1 second dude yeah dude lot of dude time there dude.
Dude, 1 second is a lot of time? I wonder how much time your two posts took which are rather needless because they don't convert all of the evil "no-description-thread-makers" and a few days later you will find another thread like this. But also you will find yourself again scolding people, wasting your time instead accepting that you can't cure the world and and...wasting more time to answer answers like this. Also changing nothing of course.
Smart dude, smart
Dude, it takes most people less than 1 second to type X three times. And dude, some people don't like to go to porn sites. Dude, some porn sites have malware dude. Dude, yeah less than 1 second dude yeah dude lot of dude time there dude.
Dude, 1 second is a lot of time? I wonder how much time your two posts took which are rather needless because they don't convert all of the evil "no-description-thread-makers" and a few days later you will find another thread like this. But also you will find yourself again scolding people, wasting your time instead accepting that you can't cure the world and and...wasting more time to answer answers like this. Also changing nothing of course.
Smart dude, smart
Enigmahood is correct -- it's extremely useful to offer a brief description of content being posted, and arguably rude to not bother.
Among other things, this clip would be impossible for anyone to find via the search engine, because there are zero useful keywords.
Among other things, this clip would be impossible for anyone to find via the search engine, because there are zero useful keywords.
The link says xvideos........there's a clue it might be porn.....just saying
Valor said: That is all reasonable. But the point is: You don't need to criticize one person because the next one doing the same is around the corner and there won't be a forum free of such people. Save your energy.
Would your advice not apply to yourself, though? If the OP is beyond criticism, then wouldn't I also be?
noise said:
You might like this:
http://bit.ly/1NF1kAt
Valor said:
And even IF he describes, what it is about you still have to check if it is something for you.
But 5 seconds...yeah, thats a huge amount of time...
And even IF he describes, what it is about you still have to check if it is something for you.
But 5 seconds...yeah, thats a huge amount of time...
You might like this:
http://bit.ly/1NF1kAt
That is hilarious, Noise! I really laughed out loud at #6, with the jackhammer up her butt!
Norman
twisteddante said: http://www.xvideos.com/video15334463/hbdsb_tube_2
Very hot! I loved the bondage even before she got messy! :devil:
Thanks for posting this!
Norman
Enigmahood said:
Would your advice not apply to yourself, though? If the OP is beyond criticism, then wouldn't I also be?
Valor said: That is all reasonable. But the point is: You don't need to criticize one person because the next one doing the same is around the corner and there won't be a forum free of such people. Save your energy.
Would your advice not apply to yourself, though? If the OP is beyond criticism, then wouldn't I also be?
The question is not if the OP is beyond criticism but "how many people do you want to criticize (with success)?". As I was saying: Even IF the OP acknowledges your thoughts - there will be repeat offenders and not just one. And to correct them is a Sisyphean task.
When this topic is so important to you, mail the admin to delete inadequate posts or vote for new forum-rules. Or apply for getting rights to delete such posts. Or you simply ignore them.
Sponsors
Design & Code ©1998-2025 Loverbuns, LLC 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Epoch Billing Support Log In