|
|
|||
| forums: groups: | |||
|
"Producers: Customs that were just...too weird?"
Love you, too
SStuff said:
It was... 2005?? I honestly can't remember.
But inside-out sweatshirts, like white socks, seem to be one of those very-specific niche things within WAM that multiple* people want to see.
* possibly just 2-3 very vocal people
Regis said:
Oh god. Please say this was Trevor.
SStuff said: The one time I did it (simple scene with the girl wearing a sweatshirt inside out).... I did it "wrong." Filmed the scene first, assuming the customer would pay after it was shot. Surprise! They didn't!
Oh god. Please say this was Trevor.
It was... 2005?? I honestly can't remember.
But inside-out sweatshirts, like white socks, seem to be one of those very-specific niche things within WAM that multiple* people want to see.
* possibly just 2-3 very vocal people
I mean I as the author of the post even have the sweater kink, but neiher sweashirts nor any need to be inside out make sense to me!
I truly think the era of the wam producer is over (or very near it).
The future will belong to the producer who can make very niche-within-a-niche customs a reality:
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2017/jul/29/jon-ronson-bespoke-porn-nothing-is-too-weird-all-requests
The future will belong to the producer who can make very niche-within-a-niche customs a reality:
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2017/jul/29/jon-ronson-bespoke-porn-nothing-is-too-weird-all-requests
The Article said: "There was one guy who wanted us to buy a van," Nate says, "and have my wife and a couple of other girls drive around in it for a week, and smoke cigarettes in the van, and pee in the van, and at the end of the week, we'd drive it out into the desert and blow it up. He sent us pictures of the van."
"Why that particular van?"
Nate shrugs. "Maybe it was similar to a van he had in high school? Maybe there was a memory attached to it?"
He says he and his wife priced that request at $30,000, given that they'd have to buy the van, acquire a permit to blow it up, hire a fire marshal for the day, and so on. That one proved prohibitively expensive for the client. Even so, "It's predominantly what I do now," Nate says.
"Why that particular van?"
Nate shrugs. "Maybe it was similar to a van he had in high school? Maybe there was a memory attached to it?"
He says he and his wife priced that request at $30,000, given that they'd have to buy the van, acquire a permit to blow it up, hire a fire marshal for the day, and so on. That one proved prohibitively expensive for the client. Even so, "It's predominantly what I do now," Nate says.
I want to know if everything was exactly right. Maybe the client forgot to mention it was supposed to happen in Saskatchewan during a hail storm, during a solar eclipse, with two ducks having consensual sex in the background. Personally, I think the last part would be the hardest.
He's more potato now than man. Twisted and evil.
Bigshipper said: I truly think the era of the wam producer is over (or very near it).
The future will belong to the producer who can make very niche-within-a-niche customs a reality:
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2017/jul/29/jon-ronson-bespoke-porn-nothing-is-too-weird-all-requests
The future will belong to the producer who can make very niche-within-a-niche customs a reality:
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2017/jul/29/jon-ronson-bespoke-porn-nothing-is-too-weird-all-requests
"Condiments Man" referred to in the article has got to be on here somewhere! It seems inevitable.
We did most things that were legal and were not gross or dangerous. We refused to do auto erotica customs because that is too dangerous (it killed actors David Carradine and Albert Dekker and musician Michael Hutchence) and we refused to do anything gross (such as the fetishes of Danny Coffee Table Thomas, Charles Laughton, Orson Welles and Cliff Richard). We only did the ones that were clean and safe, and paid a lot of money.
One of biggest sponsors Lenny and I had was a guy (who is since deceased) who paid our girls handsomely to do nothing more than put on and take off eye glasses. He would arrive with a big suitcase filled with 300 or so eye glasses and the model had to wear each eyeglass one time and then put on the next one.....very simple...and very well paid (the guy owned his own 20 acre movie studio in Hollywood and he leased his studio for 12 years to the NCIS tv series that shot all their studio scenes on his property).
But custom video people are very picky on how they want things done. We once did a custom "sneezing video" for a guy who wanted our model to sneeze continuously for 30 minutes and the girl did the best job she could at acting and sneezing....but in the end she ran out of sneezes after 15 minutes.....so I decided to be a smart arse and I added in some extra sneeze sound effects to finish out the video. The custom guy hated the video we made cos I used some fake sneeze sound effects.....but you try sneezing for 30 minutes straight....it s not easy.
MK
One of biggest sponsors Lenny and I had was a guy (who is since deceased) who paid our girls handsomely to do nothing more than put on and take off eye glasses. He would arrive with a big suitcase filled with 300 or so eye glasses and the model had to wear each eyeglass one time and then put on the next one.....very simple...and very well paid (the guy owned his own 20 acre movie studio in Hollywood and he leased his studio for 12 years to the NCIS tv series that shot all their studio scenes on his property).
But custom video people are very picky on how they want things done. We once did a custom "sneezing video" for a guy who wanted our model to sneeze continuously for 30 minutes and the girl did the best job she could at acting and sneezing....but in the end she ran out of sneezes after 15 minutes.....so I decided to be a smart arse and I added in some extra sneeze sound effects to finish out the video. The custom guy hated the video we made cos I used some fake sneeze sound effects.....but you try sneezing for 30 minutes straight....it s not easy.
MK
Do unto others, then run
Regis can sneeze for that long
wamtec said: we refused to do anything gross (such as the fetishes of Danny Coffee Table Thomas, Charles Laughton, Orson Welles and Cliff Richard).
Did you break the news to Orson and Cliff in person, or via email??
I can't imagine any fetish grosser than the music of Cliff Richard, but YMMV.
I've refused several people who had the overall creepy persona (I'm sure you know what I'm talking about) but I have it stated clearly I won't do full frontal nudity or anything to do with my vagina (and it's a very long story involving being sexually assaulted and having gender dysphoria about it) - one person just refused to accept this and demanded to know why, demanded I do things because *he* said so, because *he* would be paying for it, etc etc. Got pretty abusive and aggressive about it. Arsehole.
Bigshipper said: I truly think the era of the wam producer is over (or very near it).
The future will belong to the producer who can make very niche-within-a-niche customs a reality:
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2017/jul/29/jon-ronson-bespoke-porn-nothing-is-too-weird-all-requests
The future will belong to the producer who can make very niche-within-a-niche customs a reality:
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2017/jul/29/jon-ronson-bespoke-porn-nothing-is-too-weird-all-requests
It doesn't have to be, some producers pretty much crank out the same content over and over again to the point where if you seen one of their vids you pretty much seen them all. Those who are creative and do things totally different each time will be the fittest to survive.
Sponsors
Design & Code ©1998-2025 Loverbuns, LLC 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Epoch Billing Support Log In