https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlJSR4coN7g

2015. Never seen any mention of it. Not the greatest caking, but not bad either. And honestly, how often do you see a SELF-caking on mainstream TV??

[Note to Rogerio: This is a 50-second clip in HD. There is ZERO reason for you to copy it & upload it as a 35-second clip in SD with a generic title.]

Dat *Thump*

Nice find!

Let it go for fuck's sake, and obsess about something worthwhile. Your vendetta against Rogerio is getting tedious...

Beautiful woman self hit cake!

Good find, and Jack, I think what you meant to say was: Thank you, Rich. Thank you for actually finding something new and relevant and having a greater contribution to the community at whole beyond just regurgitating easily found material taken from others and uploaded at lower quality.

No hate on Roger, but let's call a spade a spade, shall we.

I love you, Rich, but i kind of feel the same. It angers you so much!

However, i haven't dug into the gist of what he does and why it annoys you so much, so I should probably stay out of it. ("Stay out of it, Nick Lachey!")

Also, yay for this clip! Thanks, Rich

JY

He really doesn't anger me. "Annoy" is probably a better word. It's similar to what HuffPost or Buzzfeed do... They comb the Net, find stories and memes that others tracked down on their own, then simply repost to their site and take all the credit (and hits).

That said, I don't think Rogerio is getting rich from this. Yes, he can get 20 separate clips out of a single CM, but if each one only gets 2000 views, that's still just $1.50 for YT ad revenue. And to the people who don't care about video quality, or context, or the name of the show or anyone in it, the clips are probably a godsend.

In the past he has swiped the mainstream clips I've posted about 50% of the time, though... Hence the precautionary warning.

Can anybody translate what is being said?

Rich....as somebody who has had his former Youtube channels deleted without warning for posting tv clips, I can understand the logic of posting clips with generic titles and not identifying what shows they come from, because it makes it harder for people to search and find clips for those shows, which then puts your youtube account in jeopardy.

But I don't get why high quality HD clips are re-posted as low quality SD clips....but maybe the low quality versions are smaller files that are easier to upload if you live in a country that has 3rd world internet upload speeds.

Personally I don't post tv clips to Youtube any more because you only need one hater to file a complaint and then Youtube acts like a judge, jury and executioner. Not just for tv clips...but for my own fetish scenes as well....i.e. I have had my Youtube accounts suspended and then deleted for posting totally G rated pies and messy scenes that had no nudity or erotica....with youtube saying I was deleted for "inappropriate content"...which is a catch all term that can be used for any reason they wish to dream up. Hmmmm...so posting videos of terrorists chopping people's heads off and all the millions of violent and disturbing videos is OK according to Youtube....but don't dare post a video where a model is enjoying some wam play. So these days, since Twitter increased their clip size limit to 2 mins 20 seconds last year, I post my clips to Twitter now because they are tolerant of adult media and all kinds of tv clips. My models even use Twitter to post their explicit porn clips...and Twitter allows it.

MK

Yep Mark, I was in your same boat.... A couple haters (probably with a bunch of sock puppet accounts) managed to get all my YT content pulled for "inappropriate content." Or whatever. This was like 2009 or so.

Slowly but surely I've started adding content again tho. I think YT is better about tracking things now, so that means 1-2 complaints can't get clips pulled for no reason (the good) but view numbers are WAY down from what they were years ago (the bad).

That might be the reason he does the generic titles, now that I think about it. He has quite a few Japanese clips that appear to have come from your old WAMTEC tapes, too. (Although more than likely they were taken from another user, who took them from WAMTEC.)

Youtube certainly has some sophisticated music recognition and video recognition detection software. I once posted a clip from the old show "Charlies Angels" and it was detected in 5 minutes and rejected. These days people are going to ridiculous extremes to avoid Youtube's auto detection software....i.e.

- slighting increasing or decreasing the speed or frame rate of a clip
- inverting or flipping the video
- inserting a small video picture into a larger picture frame for videos (most annoying).

Personally I find it easier to just post clips to Dailymotion (much more tolerant and no detection) or Facebook (very tolerant but will not allow nudity) or to Twitter (most tolerant and will allow nudity as well).

The irony is....that Japanese gameshow where all the girls wear colored mini dresses has had some excellent pie games on their show....and all those clips are all over Youtube....but it is always coming from the same source where the quality of the clips is truly lousy....even the clips earmarked as "HD" clips are "Fake HD" clips that look worse than 240p quality. That show is not being blocked or deleted on Youtube....so how come not one single person in Japan is uploading these clips in a decent 720p quality and everybody seems to be re-posting the same Fake HD clips. Sheesh.....if ever there was a show that begs for somebody to post some HD clips....that surely deserves better quality clips.

MK

Rich has turned into an angry bitter shell of his former self
caused by a steady-stream of smashed hopes caused by inconsistent &
just-plain-wrong South American battle-of-the-sexes tv game shows.
Forgive Rich, for he is only human.
A man can only take so much of
"Male doofus gets answer wrong: male gets pied.
Female floozy gets answer wrong: male gets pied, or MAYBE a little bit chin-pied"

We call it being pie-shocked.

Allow me to confirm and summarize what Jason said:
FUCK YOU, COMCAST!! FUCK YOU, VERIZON!!

Rich said he is annoyed by Rogerio.

I assume that Rogerio's repetitious titles are due to his English language deficiency.

Also, $1.50 may not be considered pocket change for many people in Brasil.

Definitely a woman. See my post where I linked the pic she posted on her own Instagram.

I did not stop with my channel, when I find videos that I like, I'll keep posting.
And the fact that youtube has changed the form of payment, does not change anything.
And the repeated titles, as I have said several times have nothing to do with language problems, is to support the pattern that I invented.
As there are many videos on my channel that I do not know where it is, I prefer that there is a unique pattern instead of having videos in which the title explains the context of the video and several videos without explanation.
There is even an expression in Portuguese to explain this.
8 or 80.
Or I put explanations in all videos or none.
As I know there are lots of videos it will be difficult for me to remember what they are about, so I do not do it in any way.

Responses to comments:

Rich: I was thinking of downloading your clip to my VCR and making a VHS dub of it to watch at home (for old times sake)....then maybe uploading it (the dub) with the exact same title to a dedicated YT channel.

Rogerio: you could just add a sequential number after each new video's title....that would help distinguish them all (and make Rich less annoyed).

imeanjoegreen: yes, the host refers to the comedic actress as "lady Gaga"...she does impersonations of pop stars, apparently...the over-the-top outfit does resemble one of Lady G's outfits from some recent performance...

Do that 2000 more times, and I might get annoyed with you too!