MidsWAMGuy said: Out of curiosity. What's your preference for getting messy. Clothed or naked, and why?
Clothed. WAM to me is about how it feels and looks as your clothes - ideally an outfit deliberately picked for the purpose - is gradually engulfed by the mess. The sensations of substances slipping down inside, or the cold wetness coming through as you happily and deliberately sit on a custard-drenched gateaux or slide down a mudbank into a pool of liquid clay. And how it looks as your outfit succumbs to its messy fate - even moreso if doing it with someone else, watching them gradually being engulfed while enjoying sensations as the same happens to me.
Both are great, often in sequence. I am a big fan of clothing turning transparent or being weighed down to the point it falls off.
I also love seeing cold gunge dumped down the back of a shirt or pants, its uncomfortable and gets a great reaction of discomfort.
Another great scenario is to gunge someone naked and then make them put their clean clothes back on without getting cleaned up.
I definitely lean toward certain clothes, though. Summer dresses, shirt dresses, light sweaters, a line skirts, t shirts, tank tops, tube tops.
I really dislike waterproof clothing and clothing that obscures the body too much. Rainwear never made sense to me. I also don't like rubber, pvc, etc.
Depends on the scenario. That said, when it comes to WAM I usually lean toward as little clothing as possible or none at all. Lycra will always be my go-to if I'm wearing anything, but honestly nothing compares to just giving in to the slop completely and letting yourself get swallowed up by thick gunk, totally naked.
I usually prefer to play naked if I'm flying solo. I like the way the different substances feel on my skin. I do from time to time though start off in Speedos or underwear and fill them before stripping down and covering the rest of myself. If I'm with someone else, I try to accommodate what they might want for a scene and go with that.
Visually a naked woman does a lot more for me than if she is clothed. I am an admirer of the female form.
Also, there is a naughtiness about a naked scene, it can be sexy or humiliating (mildly humiliating is my preference). Watching a clothed woman trashing a naked woman has an element of power play to it which I find titillating.
By comparison a clothed trashing seems a little softer/tamer, like the kind of thing that could happen at a public event or on mainstream TV. Universal rated instead of R-rated.
It's actually a surprisingly tricky question. I love the idea of "ruining" clothes with mess, and indeed we have a whole bag of clothing in the wardrobe kept or bought with that specific use in mind. However, although some of our most memorable - and rewatchable - sessions have started off with Mrs Reiver wearing one of these outfits, in practice, when faced with the choice, I often just find myself saying "No need to wear anything".
I think that's partly the urgency of the moment, but it's also partly logistical. You need a lot more mess to thoroughly saturate clothing than you do to simply cover a naked body, which adds both to the expense and the preparation time. Secondly, just when you get clothing thoroughly messy, you want to remove it to have sex, and that removes a lot of the mess, which puts you back at the beginning just when that's really not where you want to be! We've partly got round that with dresses or skirts, but it can still be a problem in practice. Someone in the past suggested clothes filling as a way round this, but while I think clothes filling can feel good, watching it does nothing for me - it just seems like a way of concealing the mess!
So the short answer is that while clothed and then naked might be my ideal, in practice, in the heat of the moment, the simplicity of just naked is often just too hard to resist.
Naked, but I've only done it once and wasn't in a position to clean clothes properly to avoid getting caught. Still, when I fantasize about it there's usually nudity involved.
When watching WAM I like clothes, but not many of them! Underwear or bikini is the optimum. Bare feet always preferred. Alternatively I think some sort of costume or fancy dress can be fun.
Clothed 100%. A huge part of it for me is realism, or at least potential realism in the scenario. As soon as it gets naked, it's produced fetish content, and therefore totally unrealistic and does nothing for me.
Ooooo I love both for different reasons. Clothes because to feel the clothing cling to me and how the different materials feel, esp satin and nude because esp with warm gunge on your are skin really does hit differently, esp when ahem having some special extra time hehe x
There is nothing like the feeling of pie, gunge, slop, or mud on the naked skin. With that said, I also enjoy women getting slopped in bikinis, spandex, lingerie, heels, or any other sexy outfit or costume. Different strokes for different folks.
Usually just underwear to start but it soon comes off, that's when the fun starts. The feeling of being naked & messy is so good. I love seeing women wearing yoga pants or leggings getting messy. Then naked to really get the mess.
My personal preference is for clothed, just absolutely adore how gunge looks on it.
I think certain items like short dresses can really be great for that, especially if it's poured down their top and it then starts spilling out from between their legs. I'm perfectly happy to see some skin though, I think the glamour of dresses and fancy clothes getting covered in slime is definitely a turn-on though.
It can definitely be risqué, but I'm not especially fussed if the model is naked when receiving gunge.
Thin, stretchy clothing can be very erotic if it soaked or filled with mess. It slides on the skin, holding the mess hard against the body. Aside from that, I've always been into messy skin, so naked was my choice for years.
Naked is definitely best but bra and panties are almost as good for me. I'm not going to turned down a pied woman clothed. I like a woman pied in any condition but that's my order of preference
I am firmly in the BOTH camp here. Something about seeing people willingly destroying their clothes is so naughty even without getting to NSFW territory. It might confuse people outside of the kink, but it's can still be naughty enough to turn people on who are in tune with it. And of course, I love seeing people in the nude covering themselves with wet, slick, sometimes thick substances, such as mud, paint, oil, thick chocolate batter, etc. Both are so equally appealing to me visually that I don't feel the need to choose.
Usually clothed in spandex, silky nylon shorts or similar. It's all about smooth, slippery textures that feel good all over me, so my clothing and messy fetishes are closely related I guess. There also something hot about getting muddy for a "legitimate" reason like mountain biking or footy. That said, I can certainly have fun in the mess naked as well.
Nakedness by WAM doesn't hold any particular appeal for me. With WAM I always see it in a sexual context, and I have a strong fetish for tight slimy or wet jeans or leather jeans, I always act out this sexual aspect while wearing them. I have normal sex with my buddy. What I find absolutely amazing is cum in jeans/leather jeans. My preference is for slimy or wet jeans/leather jeans.
I love having wifie wear something skimpy or see though to start off the messy play, but end with it off if I get my way. Sometimes she tells me right. Roger she gets messy she is not willing to wear something and then usually in our albums that's why she is naked in whole set
Love you, too
and nude because esp with warm gunge on your are skin really does hit differently, esp when ahem having some special extra time hehe x
