You can basically write anything into it. Here's what I wrote and the article that was generated:
- Write an article about Ariana Grande getting slimed
Ariana Grande was the unsuspecting victim of a bucket of thick green slime dumped over her head on Tuesday night's episode of "The Tonight Show."
Jimmy Fallon, who is known for his elaborate and messy stunts on the show, pulled the prank on the unsuspecting Grande.
Fallon warned Grande before the stunt, but the singer was still shocked when the slime came pouring down on her head.
"Oh my god, I can't believe you did that," Grande said after the slime was dumped on her head.
The singer then wiped the slime off her face and hair and laughed off the incident.
[Removed mention about a kid's TV show -MM]
12/7/22, 7:42pm: Edited to remove line pointing to specific episode of a kid's show. One word was replaced by dashes but everybody still knows what it is. Please don't try to play that game.
I love the stories people post onto UMD and of course people are writing stories for that they want to see/read/experience. This is a great tool. You can really come up with a lot of good things.
You can even get the AI to write it in 2nd person if you tell it to 'Write a Choose your own adventure story where ...'
Thanks for sharing this. I'd like to share some of the stories from the AI, but I don't want it to be considered in the same way any of the real work being people have written here.
Aero__ said: I love the stories people post onto UMD and of course people are writing stories for that they want to see/read/experience. This is a great tool. You can really come up with a lot of good things.
You can even get the AI to write it in 2nd person if you tell it to 'Write a Choose your own adventure story where ...'
Thanks for sharing this. I'd like to share some of the stories from the AI, but I don't want it to be considered in the same way any of the real work being people have written here.
Will one day technology advances enough for anyone create their own WAM videos with only AI? For example, anyone being able to pick up a picture of someone, typing "pie in her face" in a text box, and then - voil - a video of that person being pied is played on your screen?
rt2018 said: Will one day technology advances enough for anyone create their own WAM videos with only AI? For example, anyone being able to pick up a picture of someone, typing "pie in her face" in a text box, and then - voil - a video of that person being pied is played on your screen?
I'm expecting that in the next 20, perhaps even the next 10 years, anyone will be able to go to an AI system, pay a few dollars (or if they can afford the hardware, run for free at home), type in a detailed description of what they want to see, who they want to be in it, what outfits to be worn, what gunge to be used, exactly how to apply it / bathe in it / whatever, and the system will generate a personal 15 minute movie to Hollywood production standards showing exactly what the user requested, from multiple selectable and adjustable camera angles.
The actual underlying data the machine renders the images from will be a full 3D model of the scene meaning that it can be re-shot from any angle.
Pay a few dollars, get the movie. Pay a few more, get the actual model data download, so you can keep it for re-rendering on your home system.
This will apply to all types of fetish erotia and pornography. No more actors, no more performers, no more STD tests. Also no more niche fetish producers, except at the very high end where those with enough money to have the option will have personal performances staged just for them, filmed too but the main event will be the live action performance.
scroggle said: I don't think I could jerk off without knowing the actual event really occurred.
How would you know though? I mean at the moment the AI generated stuff is obvious because the model's got seven fingers, an extra hand growing out of her shoulder, boots that merge into her boikersuit, and eyes that point in opposite directions. But given the pace the tech is moving at, by the end of next year those issues will have been fixed, and it'll be doing 100% photorealistic still images that you can't actually tell from genuine photos.
It'll be a while yet for full motion video, which is why I'm not panicking about it, I figure my models will have work for a few years yet and there'll be people who do want that genuine "it really happened" who will go on buying, so I expect to be able to sell all the scenes we shoot. But if someone in their 20s was thinking of getting into fetish production nowadays, I'd be advising them to learn AI systems, that's the future of fetish imagery.
rt2018 said: Will one day technology advances enough for anyone create their own WAM videos with only AI? For example, anyone being able to pick up a picture of someone, typing "pie in her face" in a text box, and then - voil - a video of that person being pied is played on your screen?
I think AI that finds its way out of the uncanny valley and is realistic enough to pass even casual scrutiny is outside the lifetimes of anyone posting here. The most realistic AI "art" today needs several guardrails to keep it focused, is incredibly time/resource hungry, and still can't even render non-horrific teeth.
Just like when humans try to cut corners in their WAM today, AI-generated WAM is going to look like shit. Those who lack the money, creativity, or people skills to make the real thing will squint and pretend that AI is good enough. But it will objectively look like shit.
I think AI that finds its way out of the uncanny valley and is realistic enough to pass even casual scrutiny is outside the lifetimes of anyone posting here. The most realistic AI "art" today needs several guardrails to keep it focused, is incredibly time/resource hungry, and still can't even render non-horrific teeth.
Just like when humans try to cut corners in their WAM today, AI-generated WAM is going to look like shit. Those who lack the money, creativity, or people skills to make the real thing will squint and pretend that AI is good enough. But it will objectively look like shit.