Nothing showing, note if a pic contains nudity **OR** it's apparent the model(s) were naked when it was taken (even if their actual "bits" are out of view or covered with stickers) you need to have a verified account to post it.
As to asking about content and ethics, depends on the content and what you're asking. Asking if a scene by a specific model or producer is still available anywhere is mostly OK as long as it doesn't read as if asking for a pirate copy. Asking about stuff from say kids TV shows on the other hand isn't allowed and will get nuked by one of the mods as soon as we become aware if it.
Discussing scenes by a banned but elsewhere active producer would be OK in general terms but actively promoting or plugging their scenes would not, and the line between those positions is thin. Also note even if someone is banned, pirating their work is still unacceptable (and illegal), just as with a producer who's retired or quit the business, or died.
You probably need to detail exactly what you want to ask about, and in what context, in text, for a definitive answer.
There's a detailed FAQ in the Non-WAM forum on image posting, search for #faq to find it.
Here's what was supposed to go below- fell asleep and forgot I posted this tbh.
Basically I had an idea for a sort of master thread where you could be like "if anybody has bought this scene involving X, does it involve X or have a shot of this?" Mostly because I found a scene involving what I think is a maxi dress but I can't tell how long it is because they're sitting down in the picture and it's a $14 scene. But, I feel a thread like that might go against the rules so wanted to ask here first.
BarryMcCockiner2 said: Here's what was supposed to go below- fell asleep and forgot I posted this tbh.
Basically I had an idea for a sort of master thread where you could be like "if anybody has bought this scene involving X, does it involve X or have a shot of this?" Mostly because I found a scene involving what I think is a maxi dress but I can't tell how long it is because they're sitting down in the picture and it's a $14 scene. But, I feel a thread like that might go against the rules so wanted to ask here first.
Just message the producer in question and ask. TBH anyone shooting fully clothed scenes should be including several clean "before" shots showing the model(s) from multiple angles including full height front and back views with every scene, if you're selling fully clothed scenes then the clothes are kind of important, not showing the clean views off would be just a bit silly. The whole point of previews is to build anticipation, show the models and outfits in full detail, clean and dry, so the potential purchaser can build a good idea of exactly what they are going to get to enjoy once the messing starts.
I agree I don't think there's any harm in asking this.
DungeonMasterOne said: if you're selling fully clothed scenes then the clothes are kind of important, not showing the clean views off would be just a bit silly. The whole point of previews is to build anticipation, show the models and outfits in full detail, clean and dry, so the potential purchaser can build a good idea of exactly what they are going to get to enjoy once the messing starts.
You would think so wouldn't you? The problem is, that fully clothed isn't always the house style because clothing details are appreciated - or even because it's a fetish parody focussing on elements of a conventional genre (where nudity is out of context) They are often just boundary considerations: either determined by the individual models, the bar set by the producer to ensure wider participation of models or just a pragmatic way to operate outside the auspices of 'porn'. Therefore 'incidental'.
But people are very particular. I'm very particular about clothing and shoes. Even in disrobing scenes - a complete mess must be achieved in clothing as a stand alone - and then repeated as the layers are removed.
Trouso said: I agree I don't think there's any harm in asking this.
DungeonMasterOne said: if you're selling fully clothed scenes then the clothes are kind of important, not showing the clean views off would be just a bit silly. The whole point of previews is to build anticipation, show the models and outfits in full detail, clean and dry, so the potential purchaser can build a good idea of exactly what they are going to get to enjoy once the messing starts.
You would think so wouldn't you? The problem is, that fully clothed isn't always the house style because clothing details are appreciated - or even because it's a fetish parody focussing on elements of a conventional genre (where nudity is out of context) They are often just boundary considerations: either determined by the individual models, the bar set by the producer to ensure wider participation of models or just a pragmatic way to operate outside the auspices of 'porn'. Therefore 'incidental'.
But people are very particular. I'm very particular about clothing and shoes. Even in disrobing scenes - a complete mess must be achieved in clothing as a stand alone - and then repeated as the layers are removed.
In a similar vein, I've been disappointed before by scenes that seem to suggest more nudity or explicitness that there actually is. Like "lesbians" that never actually interact with each other, "nude" scenes where the model actually has her knees clamped together the whole time or scenes where the previews show pics of a model with her face apparently buried in the crotch of another but when you actually watch it becomes pretty obvious that there's blatantly no real oral actually going on and it's just like those old softcore movies where they're just pretending. I accept producers have to market their material to sell as many as possible but sometimes it can be hard to tell what you're actually getting just from the previews.
That said, even on a fetish site I'm still too embarrassed to come out and say "so...err.....can you actually see the girl's pussy in this scene...?"
Trouso said: I agree I don't think there's any harm in asking this.
DungeonMasterOne said: if you're selling fully clothed scenes then the clothes are kind of important, not showing the clean views off would be just a bit silly. The whole point of previews is to build anticipation, show the models and outfits in full detail, clean and dry, so the potential purchaser can build a good idea of exactly what they are going to get to enjoy once the messing starts.
You would think so wouldn't you? The problem is, that fully clothed isn't always the house style because clothing details are appreciated - or even because it's a fetish parody focussing on elements of a conventional genre (where nudity is out of context) They are often just boundary considerations: either determined by the individual models, the bar set by the producer to ensure wider participation of models or just a pragmatic way to operate outside the auspices of 'porn'. Therefore 'incidental'.
But people are very particular. I'm very particular about clothing and shoes. Even in disrobing scenes - a complete mess must be achieved in clothing as a stand alone - and then repeated as the layers are removed.
Got it- it never occurred to me to just straight up message a producer about a scene tbh so thank you for that.
I'm also very particular about clothing so I hear you there. I've seen a couple of maxi dress scenes on here where the dress comes down to just below the knees, including one that I bought (although that one is partially on me because the preview pictures didn't look very promising).
But this site again never fails to make me feel less weird about doing stuff. I thought messaging a producer about a scene would be ridiculed and instead everyone is like no go for it lol.