Just up for a discussion point.

While I enjoy both clothed and no clothes WAM videos, I have never thought of pure sex aligned with food as actual WAM. In other words if two people just decided they wanted to cover a bed with whipped cream and then have sex once in a while in it I don't view as WAM. I view that as sex and food. I realize others view both as WAM. I suppose much has to do with how one views WAM psychologically if that makes sense. Obviously for many there's a tactile feel to WAM. I think since I'm more of a viewer than a participant, the "pure sex" part just doesn't register the same way with me as WAM the way say a "clothed" video would or even a nude video with no "blatant" sex.

You can call me,

Al

What is meant here by 'pure sex' and food exactly? A scene only involving the act of sex in a foodie/messy environment? No acts of getting messy pre or post sex? No pouring, splatting, squirting, smooshing?

Either way, WAM encompasses anything wet and messy, so I don't quite understand the view that messy sex isn't WAM.

I wouldn't particularly enjoy watching someone drive their car out for a trip and back. If they did it while sitting on a cake without trousers on, I still wouldn't particularly enjoy watching it, but I would appreciate that it could then come with a WAM tag.

The primary aspect of the content does not have to be WAM for the content to be considered WAM.

Everyone can have their preferences, but if your dog sits between two slices of bread, then I'm afraid you have a dog sandwich irrespective of your sandwich preferences.

Thanks for your reply. Yes, I play devils advocate to own beliefs on this subject from time to time.
But after the last year or so of talking to a lot of people there still seems to be a divide between certain groups of WAM people. Maybe because the discovery of people's WAM interests/tendencies is so varied. I guess you're right that it's ALL variations on a theme, but that theme sure seems to take different approaches depending on what kind of WAM in which you have an interest. Maybe it also involves "intent." For instance if a gorgeous woman is painting her living room and accidentally gets some paint on her face, is THAT WAM? Or does the bucket have to be poured over her head to make it WAM?

You can call me,

Al

Intent comes in two parts here:
The act undertaken between the participants - did they intend this to be viewed under the WAM umbrella, between themselves and (if shared) between others.
The act as viewed and/or later shared by others - do they view this under the WAM umbrella? (Hopefully consent exists here too!)

But fundamentally, the above only comes into play in defining something as WAM where the amount of wetness or messiness is small. WAM is not defined by preferences.

I think you're confusing "what is WAM" with "what turns you on". I've certainly heard other people saying that what they enjoy are the "silly" aspects of WAM, in terms of pie fights or slapstick, rather than the more sexual aspects, and if that's what you're getting at that's obviously fine. I don't think it's reasonable to label things that don't work for you as "not WAM", though - I think WAM is a convenient umbrella term for anything wet and messy.

Co-sign

Not gonna lie, this sounds like a pretty hot scenario. I'm into it (especially if it was to pay off a lost bet or something like that)!

So,

If two people are having sex and have never heard of WAM, but enjoy using a little whipped cream and pudding while having sex, is that WAM? Or is it just the viewing of it that makes it WAM?

You can call me,

Al

Interested question I've been on both ends of this.

I don't know

If you've never heard of Frisbee but somebody throws a Frisbee at you and you catch it, have you just taken part in Frisbee?

If you've never heard the term 'three strikes and you're out', and you lose your audience after three bizarre questions, are you out?

Sometimes the answer to a question is a question, so that you can properly answer your own question!

Absolutely that is WAM - whether the participants are aware that WAM is the name of the fetish for doing what they are doing is irrelevant, the activity itself is wet and messy, hence it's WAM.

WAM in its purest sense is any sexual activity involving the use of wet or messy substances to enhance the pleasure. And that applies regardless of whether it's people in private having sex with whipped cream, one person pouring custard into her pants while masturbating, or people messing each other up on camera for others to watch later.

I have to agree. I have to imagine that, like most kinks and fetishes, WAM probably has existed for at least thousands of years largely undocumented. Because it is still just a small amount of people who are actively aware it is a kink (or who even know there is a term for it), and because the internet is still a relatively recent phenomenon in the history of humankind, WAM feels new but I'm sure it is not. Plus I think there are many closeted wammers running around who might never know the name of it (Doja Cat comes to mind, and possibly Lady Gaga and Katy Perry).

I should have just asked Robby:

To quote his reply:

"If someone gets pied in the forest and nobody is there to whack off is it still WAM?"

He is both a visionary and somewhat nuts.

You can call me,

Al