There seems to be a fine line between the two extremes of wam. We have fully clothed on one side, and messy porn on the other. Somewhere in the very middle is what I call the 'fine line' where it's sexy, but not explicit.
A few producers have made some excellent videos in this genre, not necessarily intentionally, but I think more based on the comfort level of the model. And what is this 'sexy' I'm talking about? It would need to be an attractive model, with a hot body, and preferably wearing something that will stick to the skin when messed, like a thin dress or Tshirt, or anything all the way down to a thong. The mess must be all-over, not just in the face. But these are not so easy to find, as most producers are either creating content that includes dildos or other pussy attention, or they are shoulder-up scenes of pies in the face, or the girls are wearing coats or rain gear.
But that sensuous woman, enjoying a head-to-toe messing, laying in whatever the substance may be, these are a rare commodity that I search for.
Am I alone, or do others seek out this kind of scene as well, and if so, perhaps more producers can get on board with this style of videos.
Bobo, what you're mostly describing is in the past tense. WAMTEC, MessyFun, etc. But we have some now with the Moomins and other like minded producers.
There is just a lot more new things being advertised than there every was before. In the past it was condensed.
You might like our formalwear scenes: https://saturationhall.umd.net/downloads/i/all/genre/formal we also usually avoid stating with the model's head, so you get to see their outfit get the treatment fully first. I know we've made something of a name for ourselves with boilersuits and with rainwear, but we do a huge range of other outfits too.
Thing with WAM is, because there's not exactly a vast amount of money in it, each producer tends to shoot what they personally like, or what their models want to do, hence each site and producer tends to have their own niche.
gness7 said: As has been suggested already, WAM almost entirely consists of fine lines. Within the fully clothed "end" you've got regular clothes, very specific types of "regular clothes" (raincoats, boiler suits, knit sweaters), cosplay, slutty etc. Within the porn "end" you've got mess with sex mixed in, sex with mess mixed in, raunchy behavior without sex, etc. And even in the middle you have to ask a bunch of question: swimsuits? Lingerie? Overtly erotic? Not overtly erotic but still eliciting an aroused response? Is the subject leaning into it or not acknowledging it at all?
What you've identified is just one of the many fine lines in this great genre. Personally, my head is spinning and I'm tired of trying to keep track of it all. I know what I like and how I like it and I make content to that end because nobody else will. Y'all can fight over the rest. If you want to be happy with your WAM life, I suggest you reach that point.
Very well expressed. Yes, many fine lines within the variations of this thing we all love. I guess I was raised on the centerfold mentality of a gorgeous girl wearing next-to-nothing. She may have been topless or wet, but always with the crotch area covered. Because everything wasn't shown, it was more erotic to me than a girl with her legs spread. Call it the tease factor.
With wam, I suppose my niche is to take the same type of girls and have them messy. Not bottomless, but also not wearing lots of clothing. In my mind, there's the 'too much clothing' side and the 'too much crotch' side, with many mini genres on each side. A few producers have hit the middle perfectly, such as Slapstick Stuff. (though I'd love to see more emphasis on bodily messing and less on the face, but that's a fine point)
As for your observations, they are spot on. I am happy with my wam life and know what I like. I ride this fine line like I do the one between insanity and genius. For me, it's where the excitement is.
Love you, too
