When it comes to WAM, how soft do we go. Of course people completely trashing in copious amounts of gunge, paint, mud or food is definitely WAM. This then goes down levels to less amounts, but still WAM, this include Wet as well. But would simple soap suds count. I suppose a full on car wash would. But just a few suds be includes.
The reason I ask is that the latest edition of the arty nude photo Magazine called Tempting has a set with a man and (mainly) woman with soap suds on them. Done, as you would expect in a more art style than just getting Wet/Messy for the sheer thrill.
Would it count? I still think they are good pics. Any thoughts?
I'm perfectly fine with more artsy shots, and even have a preference towards them.
My preference for wam is clothed, so when nudity is involved, the artistic route is what makes those photos more interesting for me, especially when there's no personal connection.
A more subtle, artsy wam can do wonders with less coverage, too... and when you think about it, foam or shaving cream is just thick and thicker suds (sort of...)
I'm perfectly fine with more artsy shots, and even have a preference towards them.
My preference for wam is clothed, so when nudity is involved, the artistic route is what makes those photos more interesting for me, especially when there's no personal connection.
A more subtle, artsy wam can do wonders with less coverage, too... and when you think about it, foam or shaving cream is just thick and thicker suds (sort of...)
Thanks tsarmina. I must say that I too don't mind an arty style shoot, I have in fact I've posted a few on here. I also think that Clothed WAM is equally (in some cases better) than WAM with nudity.
Clothed WAM invokes the viewers imagination more I think.
Love you, too
