Love the witty responses. My eyes roll at most of his polls (most of them are fantasies; not gonna happen) but I can always skip them. Let him do his thing.
(Similar posts: "Should I pie this girl?" C'mon! Has this group ever said no? And how often do we ever see proof that the OP really did pie that girl, or had even met her?)
Sleazoid44 said: (Similar posts: "Should I pie this girl?" C'mon! Has this group ever said no? And how often do we ever see proof that the OP really did pie that girl, or had even met her?)
Full disclosure: Those posts are a cheap ploy we producers use. We've already pied the girl, but we know that super-professional shot done by a real photographer is gonna create the kind of fantasties that spur sales... when the inevitable more-realistic-but-plainer version of said girl finally shows up in our video.
SStuff said: Full disclosure: Those posts are a cheap ploy we producers use. We've already pied the girl, but we know that super-professional shot done by a real photographer is gonna create the kind of fantasties that spur sales... when the inevitable more-realistic-but-plainer version of said girl finally shows up in our video.
They're also efficient in that they often enable me to cyberstalk a new model and creep her out even before her first shoot debuts!
I don't understand why so many people voted NO. What motivation would there be? Its not like they are burdensome in any way. If you aren't interested, don't click on them and move on.
Bozo1 said:... If you aren't interested, don't click on them and move on.
You mean I can choose to NOT click on a thread? I always thought that I had to click on everything and then post my displeasure if the content didn't specifically cater to my interests.
Love you, too
