Just a quick question regarding future shoots. Do you prefer the 'normal' lighting or more dramatic? Here are two photos of Tina showing more dramatic side-lighting. I like it but it will be harder to shoot this way. It does tend to show curves of the body better, and will also show messy surfaces in a new light. (pun intended) Any preferences?
Wow, it seems pretty clear so far that 'normal' lighting is the preferred choice. I may throw an occasional 'studio shot' in from time to time, but basically this makes my job easier. Keep on voting, it might swing the other way, who knows?
I'm going with normal because thinking to your older submissions I liked how if you were browsing through thumbnails you really had no idea that this wasn't an actual model. That can depend a lot on the lighting.
The very heart of you art that I love is how you bring life and glamour forth from a lifeless doll. So anything that causes the shot to appear more REAL is better in my opinion.
I also love the aspect of how you can micro/macro with this figure. For instance you can use an actual champagne glass for a shoot that would otherwise with real models take you out to Mt. Pocono PA to do.
Hey man, I REALLY appreciate the kind words. Sometimes I wonder if anyone is noticing my posts, as I get very few (if any) comments for all of the views. My whole 'thing' is about making these scenarios appear real. To me, the fantasy element is easier to feel a part of if the photos appear to be real women, just as with actual models, it's best for me if they look involved. (rather than 'when do I get paid for this shoot' expressions)
As for expressions, the dolls have none, but I've noticed that different camera angles can sort of bring out different expressions a little bit. I really hope the manufacturer will animate the jawbone and have a mouth that can open, frown, smile, etc. but that would likely put the price of these WAY up, and I'm not sure if enough buyers would want that feature. I'm going to do a post about the dolls, as they are very unique.
Again, thanks a ton for your great feedback! It's what keeps me wanting to do more of these.
Potatoman-J said: I'm going with normal because thinking to your older submissions I liked how if you were browsing through thumbnails you really had no idea that this wasn't an actual model. That can depend a lot on the lighting.
The very heart of you art that I love is how you bring life and glamour forth from a lifeless doll. So anything that causes the shot to appear more REAL is better in my opinion.
I also love the aspect of how you can micro/macro with this figure. For instance you can use an actual champagne glass for a shoot that would otherwise with real models take you out to Mt. Pocono PA to do.
Emi said: Hey man, I REALLY appreciate the kind words. Sometimes I wonder if anyone is noticing my posts, as I get very few (if any) comments for all of the views
Don't let that get you down. Everyone has their own thing. Look at the views sometimes. A lot of times I check your stuff but I don't really have much to say. Continue to do what you love to do. That's what's important!