Just want to present the opposing viewpoint even if it is in the minority. Sure boobs are ok but tops for me are a pair of long or shapely legs... Boobs are great but I don't need handlebars to ride a bike ! I do need wheels!!
I've always been a legs and bums fan, in our scenes, you always see the girls' legs, laps, and usually bottoms, going from clean to messy in detail, and its what I look for in scenes I buy from other producers. The ultimate form of WAM for me is a two girl scene where they take turns to pour mess into each other's jeans or tight running pants, front and back.
fredsout said: Just want to present the opposing viewpoint even if it is in the minority. Sure boobs are ok but tops for me are a pair of long or shapely legs... Boobs are great but I don't need handlebars to ride a bike ! I do need wheels!!
Jansson said: It's always a pity when you find out a vid just shows 2/3rd of the body, while the girls' legs & feet can be so sexy.
Can't agree more with this really. If a video only consists of the one static camera shot pointed at the girl's upper body only then there is no way I will bother viewing it. Sadly there are a lot of videos where this happens!
I've seen too many videos where the girl has been perfect, the mess amazing, BUT for some reason the director doesn't give us any glimpses of their legs and feet. Seems such a waste.
Although, special kudos should go to those producers who do offer wide and close versions of the same video. I would love to see this become the norm and hats off to those few producers who are already doing this!
Jansson said: It's always a pity when you find out a vid just shows 2/3rd of the body, while the girls' legs & feet can be so sexy.
Can't agree more with this really. If a video only consists of the one static camera shot pointed at the girl's upper body only then there is no way I will bother viewing it. Sadly there are a lot of videos where this happens!
I've seen too many videos where the girl has been perfect, the mess amazing, BUT for some reason the director doesn't give us any glimpses of their legs and feet. Seems such a waste.
When we shoot static camera, we always ensure the model(s) are fully visible, usually down to their feet, and when we shoot hand-held we ensure you always get to see the girls' lower halves, as well as their heads and upper body, getting messy. From a personal POV I always want to see the actual clean-to-messy transformation happening, so a pan-down after the event is no good, the actual getting messy has to happen on camera.
I still remember once watching a scene where the still photos showed the models' full height, but then the video only showed waist-up, even as the mess that was being poured onto one girl was flowing down over the awesome silver satin trousers she was wearing - off camera! I absolutely screamed abuse at the screen - and then remembered that all the windows were wide open (hot summer night) so half the district had just heard me bellowing my disapproval.
DungeonMasterOne said: I've always been a legs and bums fan, in our scenes, you always see the girls' legs, laps, and usually bottoms, going from clean to messy in detail, and its what I look for in scenes I buy from other producers. The ultimate form of WAM for me is a two girl scene where they take turns to pour mess into each other's jeans or tight running pants, front and back.
And for that we are eternally greatful - nice to see more tights appearing in yor videos