As you know, 99.9% of our models go nude. But there are many non-nude models out there who do wam for other producers. Would you like to see any of them in a non-nude Messygirl style production?
Works for me; Linda was one of your hottest models (slash employees ) and IIRC she never so much as went topless. (Which is not to say I don't enjoy a bit of the ol' nudity now and then.)
I say that nudity is not always that tasteful or even artistically creative. Sometimes going nude is going a little too far. Covering up the "naughty bits" and leaving more to the imagination of the viewer can sometimes be even sexier than just going full-on nude. Besides, I like formal dresses and lingerie!
All this cake, there must be a princess somewhere.
It really doesn't matter to me to be honest nude and non nude are both welcomed by me so i think it's worth a try. Also one great thing about doing this is it increases the range of the models available to you which in turn means more content for us to enjoy and a variety of even more beautiful girls enjoying wam what's not to love, it also allows for more variety in what outfits the models will wear so I say go for it My suggestion is a nice crisp business suit with silk blouse or a lovely ball gown. hope the input helps.
gness7 said: Isn't that basically what you do/did with Just Pie Me?
Personally I'd love to see it. But I'm also biased. New blood is always great for WAM and if opening up your shop to non-nude models will bring it in I'm all for it.
Just be ready to field every other reply/complaint asking why your non-nude models don't get nude. We have a bit of a listening problem around here.
JPM is more of a first timer non-model site, but if they are brave enough to become a Messygirl, we will not stop them.
We are looking to find established models who will not go nude, but are willing to get messy.
I say go for it. I also like having sex with women who don't take their clothes off.. wait, strike that, reverse it. I meant to say please keep going with nude models
Appealing to a wider audience is never a bad thing, Leah! I wouldn't mind a change of pace and seeing a bikini clad Lane initiating a new fully clothed Messygirl!
Yes, MG! Ordinary non-thong bikini bras and panties are MY personal favorite. I know all your models, and you, too, MG, have lovely breasts & other body parts. But, I always keep wishing they would not go topless or nude in your videos. There's something about underwear, specifically, that increases the thrill for me exponentially. I think it may be the humiliation-slapstick factor.
Warning! Warning, I Will Rob Your Son! I am cheap & have no money & cannot afford to buy your videos (well, I can, but I obsessively stick to a no-frills budget until I can get a paid job), but, by all means, DO make videos to my detailed specifications. :ohbruther:
MG, by all means, go for it! If it brings in more new models that are willing to get extremely messy without going nude. I'm ok with nudity, but I'm also ok with fully clothed.
I'm a fan of nudity in my wam. If it is a direction that you want to go, I have no problem with it, just be aware that some of your current fans (myself for instance) will not be purchasing the new non-nude content, so hopefully it won't become your dominant content. I have purchased some non-nude content in the past, but it is definitely the exception to the rule.
I have been a member of the membership site in the past, and will probably be again in the future (currently I've been buying the scenes I want through your download store), but if too much of the content becomes non-nude, that would influence the decision to join.
Otherwise I don't have a problem with it. You will probably pick up some new customers but it is a fine line to avoid losing any existing fans/customers.
Edit: Looking at your question again, I think you are saying that there will be the occasional non-nude update here and there rather than an overly significant percentage of your content that way. If that is the case then it certainly would not be a problem.
I enjoy nudity just as much as any other guy, but I get my fill when I watch vanilla porn. I love seeing clothes along with the girl get messy in WAM films. I just wish more producers used costumes and spandex. I feel like it's always either a dress or nude.
I really liked Lexi in that sexy little pink dress she had which was sort of sporty/cheerleader style. That was a very sexy outfit. I also liked that she got naked. My only issue was that she didn't get the dress messy enough before taking it off.
For me, nudity is a fairly integral part of WAM. It follows that if you're feeling sexy, then the clothes eventually come off. I like lingerie for a bit of panty filling, but if a girl is going to achieve that messy climax of sitting on a cake, she needs to be naked, at least on the bottom half. This is because acts like that, along with many others in the world of WAM, are largely about the way the experience feels. If the sensation is created through wearing particular clothing, so be it, but when I see girls getting messy, for me personally I identify with the feeling they must be experiencing as opposed to just the way it looks.
I love to see a sexy outfit getting trashed, but I'm also a fan of nudity in my WAM, and don't generally mind whether the model starts that way or just ends up that way.
I have been happier with more nudity and more sexual content on Messygirl. You had a lot of non nude WAM models such as Linda back in the day and only topless models like Lexi and Allison. I wouldn't be a regular customer as much if you mixed in more non - nude models. It wouldn't be worth it for me. Check out my records on the site! I have been a regular for years!
I think there are a big segment like me who got into WAM as part of slapstick on TV or Nick and who still prefer fully clothed pies and humiliation. That would add another market segment I would think.
By non-nude, do you mean actually fully clothed (i.e. wearing something they'd wear in a city street, or to the opera), or just "non nude" as in bikinis or the like?
DungeonMasterOne said: By non-nude, do you mean actually fully clothed (i.e. wearing something they'd wear in a city street, or to the opera), or just "non nude" as in bikinis or the like?
Our plan with the non nude shoots would have them go from fully clothed and end up in their panties and bra, with the occasional garter and stockings, kind of like how the girls in the Benny Hill skits end up. We will get them messy both full clothed and in their skivvies. We will also have them start out in bikinis in other shoots as well.