Anyone have the pic of Gilly Sampson and Louise Hodges together holding pies up before they pied each other? Would love to see those again

I think I know which ones you mean, from the sillygilly website. Maybe not quite up to splosh! standards, but some fun sets.

Anyone have any more pics from this set? I've never seen it before but it looks interesting!

This set is one from the Splosh! Sister site called Gilly's Silly House, now defunked. I'm sure I have the set somewhere. I'll have a route about, my PC filing system is (ironically) rather messy.

OMG!!!! This is the one -you my friend are a legend!

If I had one WAM wish, it would be that Gilly Silly House and Splosh were fully functioning once again. I spent a lot of time and energy on GSH in particular.

So hope Mr Pink has more from the set

I do, but have an unverified account and "photos with nudity or sexual suggestiveness will be deleted" which rules out most of the rest of them. Never sure what will pass, as even a wink could be described as sexual suggestiveness. I'll try a few more, but after those pics, part of Louise's nips can just be seen popping over her the top of her dress, and after that, clothes start coming off, so they're out of bounds for me posting.

Yeah, I've had pics deleted in the past, too - of Gilly, in fact.

Oh well, thanks for trying anyway.

Can you buy this set or video anywhere? Love their outfits. Tried finding it online but the links were all down.

From what I recall, the owner of the site, Bill Shipton, died unexpectedly and without leaving a will. Everything reverted to his parents, who didn't fully approve of porn and basically shut everything down. Not sure if there's any way round this ...

Please do NOT share or trade any images from old or defunct producer content. There are several reasons for this:

1. It's illegal. The images are copyright to the original producer and so making copies is against the law. It's also against the Terms of Service of UMD.

2. It reduces the incomes of current WAM models. No-one can compete with free. By and large most producers have other income sources, but often models do not. Trading material is taking money directly from current models, which is unfair to them.

Please, do not do this.

UK copyright law covers items published in magazines/periodicals for 25 years. After that it's considered public domain.
If I understand the law correctly, which I may not, that means anything Bill published before 1997 is now fair game, regardless of his family's wishes. Films and sound recordings are 70 years, btw.

Yup, looks like I'm wrong. Only the typographical content gets 25 years, images are 70 years after producers death

Does this mean we shouldn't but these which are for sale on ebay?;

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314236493849?hash=item4929f46019:g:WYcAAOSw1KRjMYpx&amdata=enc%3AAQAHAAAA0CymszUAGyrjU7tzRYlddrpsfDJxZ%2B0C8E0qLm7N1Eq0cgfyvqgf2xWo5f476ocJGVJ%2F%2FEedbZOdZWETDRgTuWCOdog9KBQ1FSws%2Bphs9CChSvUWToAlQlx5b3iYs%2BAtYvlwla%2B9NzmriRmT3cFKsauE2x3uEZLLg5%2BPHJtfLSnR1yxCLjR2Rtgmh7TzqdtlDR%2BCMM1sbPw8MlDXzooUCbiaBehclrn99Q%2F4nOLyTV8WxJd5K30%2BJ9fB%2FmOroVvidjeCEB8csX3vbZu%2BZrkjmdU%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR9ym0MObYQ

Trading/sharing whole sets isn't something I do (if you PM'd me asking and got no reply, that is why) but I think posting the odd shot, it's not going to have a negative impact. There is a wealth of free WAM material already available in the form of samples, so models and producers, past and present, they are already competing with free, successfully. Little posts like this, are more likely to have a positive impact for producers in general.

In this case, the site no longer existed, so no potential to drive any business towards it, but the splosh back catalogue recently resurfaced, and both ladies are in there, so a potential positive exists for this post to lead onto sales of that magazine.

For a proven positive, I'll refer to a recent forum post, where a daily sport 2 page spread celebrating pudding day was shared. In that shared image, there was an unidentified photo of a long haired lady covered in cream pie. After some detective work, it turned out to be Lane in a Messygirl set, used by the sport without permission or credit. Naughty. But I ended up paying to join the member site specifically to download that photo set.

This is okay!

It's fine and legal to buy and sell hard copy ORIGINAL editions of print and media like magazines DVDs and video cassettes as they are individually licensed pieces of property.

It's not legal to sell or share COPIES of these items or share the images and videos from them in public or on the internet without permission. When you reproduce a copyrighted image and make it available to others you are effectively illegally PUBLISHING or BROADCASTING it - so permission needs to be sought/licenses paid for etc.

When you buy a DOWNLOAD (unless you've bought the rights) you are NOT buying the media itself but only a single LICENSE for you and you alone to retrieve and watch it.