SS221 features all-natural, low-key beauty Julie.... who did a Playboy feature just a few short years ago! Ah, how the mighty have fallen. But her (career's) loss is our (stupid website's) gain!

RAWHD.SlapstickStuff.com

Three scenes of unedited footage from multiple angles now available! (There's also a "bonus" fourth scene I might sell too, depending on interest...?)

Just a little backstory: I never try to "coach" my models beyond the basics. I prefer their reactions to be natural, and I'll lean into that rather than forcing them into a script or preconceived notion. SO: When you see SS219 Riley bouncing around, taking pie after pie and cake after cake while laughing & rubbing it around & eating it off her face.... That's all her.
And so, when you see Julie look terrified to get pied... or shake her head in resignation as she gets yet another sliming.... That's all her too. Scene 2 was a bit more scripted (it's a version of our previous Maid scene with less nudity but MORE humiliation?), and Scene 3 really played up Julie's passive nature as every pie hit (including marshmallow fluff!) gets smeared around for maximum effect while she keeps taking it. (Oh yeah, and LOTS of cleavage digging in both...)

As for Scene One.... Here's the review from fredsout:
"This Julie chick is the bomb. I usually prefer the lean leggy types but this girl is an awesome rep of the dangerous curves variety.
The pie virgin scene (silver sparkly dress) can never be duplicated. A girl can be a pie virgin only once. She's legit apprehensive and then seems legit shocked and humiliated. If she's acting she should be in Hollywood."

Not much acting... but definitely a great volume if you like this kind of vibe! (And it's rare for us, so I can't promise similar scenes anytime soon.) Enjoy!

"The pie virgin scene..." referring to Scene 1: I thought I heard you and her talking about previously getting pied. Did I mishear? Or are the Scenes not necessarily numbered in the order in which they were produced? I've always wondered about that, if a Scene 1 of a particularly volume is filmed before Scene 2, etc.

Whatever, I really liked 221/1. Something about pies and cakes on a girl wearing a sexy dress. Must be due to my misspent youth watching Three Stooges and late 1950s comedy/variety shows.

Fantastic stuff with Julie, Rich!

This girl looks a lot like one if my exes. Before I buy these do all the scenes have pie smearing or just scene 3? Are there intentional cakings as well? Im less into the pretend fall into the cake or self or assisted self cakings.

Scene 2 might have a bit but Scene 3 is the main one for smearing. Less pies but more smear?

I didn't do intentional cakes with her, just because based on the enthusiasm (or lack therof) when she pied herself, I knew she'd do a piss-poor job.
It's a tricky thing.... I KNOW there's as many people into "how" a cake happens as are into the aftermath. I tend to skew in the direction of best results tho, which is usually coming behind the model and slamming the cake back in her face. Amazing results, just not a self-cake. (I do zoom the Closeup in so you only see me for a split second. I don't want to see me either!)

Scene 1 was definitely shot first, and she'd definitely never been pied before. Not sure what you heard!
Just FYI, if a model is a "pie virgin," I will ALWAYS have Scene 1 be the first scene we shoot. But beyond that, I do change the order. Like, I think Candi's first volume was scenes 1, 3 & 5, with 2 & 4 still to come. Riley's first was scenes 1, 2 & 5. Scenes 3, 4 & 6 to come.
Some of it is for pacing or variation.... Some of it honestly is timing. If I have 2 shorter scenes at the end, I'm gonna put 'em on different volumes.

She's very cute!

So, does this mean she's probably not coming back?

Based on sales thus far.... Not a chance!

always bums me out hearing "This didn't sell at all". But i do appreciate you being honest about it...

As i'm someone who tries to look at the glass half full, which ladies HAVE sold particularly well in the last six months or so?

JY

I mean, I would've bought this one if she had been a Juggs model.

Aw shit, we lost Regis again?!?!?

ANYWAY. I did a couple dress scenes with Julie as that wardrobe seemed to work for her, and also because a LOT of you were asking me to do less bikini, more dress. That said.... If dress fans don't actually buy the scenes, then um.... Expect more bikini scenes? (Sorry Robby!)

Stuff that has done well:
SS219 Riley (all bikini/lingerie, I know, but I'm not sure that girl OWNS a dress)
SS218 cake fight (but this was VERY expensive and hard to shoot, so it might be a while for a sequel)
SS215 Morgan (who went full nude, so no surprise there!)
SS213 Abby (Round 2 as good as Round 1! Well done, customers!)

And Taylor and Bre are steady sellers. Nothing flashy, but they've got a built-in fanbase now. I was a little bummed that Lucy's Round 2 (SS220) didn't do better.

The only REALLY underselling volume from the last couple years has been SS202/216 Jess... not sure why she didn't connect... and now Julie so far. But it's early yet.

Are people OK with me being transparent? I know nearly all other producers are like Netflix and refuse to release numbers. I dunno, I'll come straight out and tell you if a model is selling (or not) and if she's coming back (or not). That's just how I am. Some of my favorite girls from 2018 are no longer shooting for a variety of reasons (but mostly being pregnant) which has kinda made this a weird transition year of sorts.

Sorry Rich, I guess it doesn't help that she doesn't seem to like the mess at all either.

It's wonderful that you are. I think everyone can benefit from everyone's perspective.

I know that after past experiences (and my wish to cut down on spending), I stick with extra beautiful models, good acting, humiliation based scripts and a video to prove this.

Don't over analyze. It's Memorial Day weekend. Activity on these WAM board is always lighter on big holiday weekends (you'd think WAMmers had a life!)


Wait --- is that cause and affect? They shoot with you and get pregnant. Rich!

I did my part! Love the video, but I wish you had slimed her more.

Personally, I appreciate the blunt honesty, but I'm sure others don't. I'm sure some will say stuff like 'you ruined the fantasy' or 'I don't want to think about a WAM model having family/kids' etc. like in the past.

I dunno. The downside is that it potentially turns the whole thing into a horserace. But then again... it kind of is a race, in a sense. So, on balance, it's up to you.

If I were to really whine about something... maybe don't let your self-deprecating humor accidentally splash onto innocent bystanders, like it does in the OP by knocking her career. I mean, you might even end up sabotaging your own sales that way, because it makes potential customers feel like arseholes because we're tacitly contributing to the downfall of her career. Ya gotta find the right mix between candor and discretion, and so long as the model wasn't a horrible human being, it's a good idea to try to put them in their unique best light (except, you know, still pied and stuff). Just 2 cents.

Well, I hope people knew that was a joke about her "career".... Julie's doing just fine, she honestly doesn't play the social media model game, which is kinda nice.

Regis is apparently banned and not welcome on this site anymore.

You've just described Robby's dream WAM producer scenario! (I kid... but kinda not?? The guy is scary good at market-analyzing WAMmers far beyond the rest of us....)


I don't want anyone to feel TOO sorry for me, tho. Sorry if I gave that impression! Look, I don't work in an office. I don't have a 9-to-5, and I pay my bills comfortably. That's HUGE. And I'm not really micro-analyzing customers and buying trends to determine what sells better. (Much to Robby's eternal chagrin.)

A LOT of this is seat of the pants and gut instinct. And occasional luck. Which is good! It's how I got Toshia ages ago, and Bre more recently. I went through periods where I was using the same couple models a LOT (ah, Shelly) and now I'm trying to mix it up as much as possible.

The upside: There is nothing better when you take a chance on a new model and she knocks it out of the park, and you KNOW it's gonna be a hit with customers, and it is. That makes up for a LOT of bullshit.
The downside: Every new model is a roll of the dice, so you're gonna get some flakes... some last-minute cancels... some shoots that go sideways... some models that just aren't a good fit. Those are the times this "job" isn't fun. But it's the nature of the beast. Shooting the same thing, with the same couple of models, over and over for years, would be REALLY boring to me. (Insert joke about how "Rich shoots the same thing with DIFFERENT models over and over for years" here.)

Julie was a dice roll, and for me personally, not entirely successful. Regardless of sales. But my opinion isn't more important than anyone else's. A couple folks have privately told me how much they LOVE her, so I'm glad I shot with her, even just this once. Also, to put the timeline in perspective, she came at the end of a 6-month run where I shot with Erica, Abby, Candi, and Morgan, and every one of those shooting days were "dream job" scenarios.

I've only just spotted the "Profile Deleted" thing. Shame. Like most on here, I got the joke with his comedy troll persona and was sorry to see him go a few months back, but by the sound of it this second departure seems to be for a more serious reason. Darn.

Anyway, to add to a few other comments, I enjoy reading your analyses about what's selling, what isn't, and why in both cases. As a non-producer, I find any glimpse behind the scenes fascinating!

Seeing things in your post like how the model "immediately regrets it" or "when you see Julie look terrified to get pied... or shake her head in resignation as she gets yet another sliming.... That's all her too." puts me off from the get go, insinuation that the model is having a bad time at a shoot is a huge turn off.

Of course, people should never be catering their marketing strategies around individual customers takes, I'm sure there are some on here that are specifically looking for a model who isn't enjoying herself, so take that with a grain of salt. Just my opinion!

Rich, I wonder too why Jess didn't connect. She is adorable.
Honestly, I tend to like a good bit of skin if I am going to buy a clip, but she is one I still want to snag a clip of, even though she's modestly attired. I haven't bought much lately due to a massive sewer line expense, but I should finally have it paid off in a couple of weeks then I hope to get back to snagging some clips. Jess may be one of the first on my list.
And if you can bring back Angie, I'm all in.

Yeah, I never figured out Jess either. She showed a good amount of skin, just no thong or actual nudity.

Angie from SS194 didn't do well either, unfortunately. I've actually been trying to bring in more Hispanic and "exotic" models, but TBH.... aside from Bre and Candi (who showed a LOT of skin), all my non-white models, going back years, haven't done well. I HOPE this isn't a wider trend in WAM and simply just a personal case-by-case thing.