https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6864727/Ex-Catholic-reveals-splosher-loves-smothering-cakes-puddings.html

A journalist approached me about doing an article about a MessyHot model and promised some promotion as well as the exposure that would come with it. The article is well written but the brand I've spent over a decade building was reduced to "somebody on Instagram that shares the same interests" and some photo captions. I confronted the journalist about it and she changed the copy on their newswire site but I hasn't been pushed to all outlets. At least I get mentioned in the photo captions. From now on I'm demanding written promise that I get to review final copy before approving use of my photography

It's the dailymail, you can't expect much tbh. Journalist is a generous title for those people.

I suppose "woman publicly enjoys her quirky fetish" makes for a more interesting story than "colourful woman is a fetish model." Bizarre that they didn't even mention your site in passing.

Fair enough but my interview was with a lady who writes for a newswire and dailymail picked it up

The Daily Heil will re-write anything no matter where it comes from in order to create click-bait.

Hence this: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website